Name of author | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Total |
|---|
M. Seid Ali et al. [3] | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 |
A. Alemu et al. [17] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9 |
Alle et al. [18] | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 |
Mekonen et al. [19] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9 |
Adal et al. [20] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9 |
Fekadu et al. [21] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9 |
H endale [22] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9 |
Sileshi et al. [23] | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 |
- Y Yes, N No, JBI critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data: Q1 = was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population? Q2-Were study participants sampled appropriately? Q3-Was the sample size adequate? Q4-Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? Q5-Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample. Q6-Were the valid methods used for the identification of the condition? Q7-Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants? Q8-Was there appropriate statistical analysis? Q9-Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
