Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample characteristics and differences in emergency nursing competency (N = 157)

From: Triage—clinical reasoning on emergency nursing competency: a multiple linear mediation effect

Characteristics

Categories

Mean ± SD

or

n (%)

Emergency nursing competency

Mean ± SD

t or F

Sheffe*

P

Sex

Male

17 (10.8)

3.88 ± 0.51

0.251

 

0.802

Female

140 (89.2)

3.85 ± 0.48

Age (year)

 

33.31 ± 6.97

    

20  29

52 (33.1)

3.81 ± 0.52

0.506

 

0.604

30  39

75 (47.8)

3.87 ± 0.48

≥ 40

30 (19.1)

3.91 ± 0.42

Marriage status

Single

89 (56.7)

3.83 ± 0.52

− 0.593

 

0.554

Married

68 (43.3)

3.88 ± 0.44

Education

Diplomaa

27 (17.2)

3.71 ± 0.41

7.121

a, b < c

0.001**

Bachelorb

106 (67.5)

3.82 ± 0.48

More than Graduatec

24 (15.3)

4.17 ± 0.43

Clinical experience (year)

 

8.15 ± 5.87

    

1  5

64 (40.8)

3.81 ± 0.46

2.926

 

0.057

6  10

52 (33.1)

3.79 ± 0.52

≥ 11

41 (26.1)

4.01 ± 0.45

Clinical experience in the ED (year)

 

4.06 ± 3.20

    

1  2

59 (37.6)

3.85 ± 0.47

0.425

 

0.654

3  5

64 (40.8)

3.82 ± 0.49

≥ 6

34 (21.7)

3.92 ± 0.50

Position

General nursea

105 (66.9)

3.78 ± 0.50

3.860

a < b

0.023*

Charge nurseb

39 (24.8)

4.03 ± 0.43

Head nursec

13 (8.3)

3.90 ± 0.32

Hospital type

General Hospital

117 (74.5)

3.86 ± 0.50

0.460

 

0.646

Advanced

General Hospital

40 (25.5)

3.82 ± 0.43

Emergency type

Local Emergency Medical Center

120 (76.4)

3.84 ± 0.48

− 0.279

 

0.782

Regional Emergency Medical Center

37 (23.6)

3.87 ± 0.51

Experience with

KTAS education

Have

131 (83.4)

3.86 ± 0.49

0.315

 

0.753

None

26 (16.6)

3.83 ± 0.44

Maintenance of KTAS certification

Yes

101 (64.3)

3.87 ± 0.50

0.589

0.557

No or None

56 (35.7)

3.82 ± 0.46

  1. ED = Emergency department; KTAS = Korean Triage and Acuity Scale; SD = Standard deviation
  2. *P <.05, **P <.01, ***P <.001