Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pain assessment practice and associated factors among nurses working at adult care units in public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2021

BMC Nursing volume 21, Article number: 115 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Using standard pain assessment techniques is a cornerstone for effective pain management. Pain is not assessed in a standardized manner in numerous practice settings. The problem of applying pain assessment principles was found to be higher in low-income countries. Very limited evidence indicates the standard of pain assessment practice among nurses in Ethiopia. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify pain assessment practice and associated factors among nurses working at adult care units in public hospitals in the Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 290 nurses working at adult care units in public hospitals in Wolaita zone. Data were collected from February to March 2021. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Epi Data 4.6 was used to enter the data, and SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the data. A logistic regression model was used, and statistical significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05. An adjusted odds ratio with 95%CI was used to measure the degree of association.

Results

A total of 267 nurses participated in the study, giving a response rate of 97.8%. Almost three-fourths (73.8%) of the study nurses reported that they assessed pain for their patients. Only 23.6% of the study nurses discussed pain assessment scores during a nurse-to-nurse report. Below, half (47.2%) of the study participants documented pain assessment scores. The proportion of nurses with good pain assessment practice was found to be 38.2%.

The odds of having good pain assessment practice among nurses who received training on pain management was two times higher than its counterpart. The nurses who perceived organizational support were twice more likely to have good pain assessment practice than their counterparts.

Conclusion

Nurses’ pain assessment practice was found to be low. Moreover, a substantial proportion of the study nurses did not discuss pain assessment scores during a nurse-to-nurse report with low documentation practice. Continuous professional development through in-service training and education is crucial to the improvement of nurses’ pain assessment practice. Furthermore, ameliorating organizational support by means of a supportive working environment is suggested to the betterment of nurses’ assessment practice.

Peer Review reports

Background

Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage [1, 2]. The evidence shows that pain is one of the main reasons patients seek medical care [3,4,5,6]. Untreated pain has an impact on patients' clinical and psychological well-being, as well as hastens their risk of mortality and has a slew of other negative repercussions, such as raising treatment expenses, lengthening hospital stays, and lowering their quality of life [2, 7,8,9,10,11].

Pain is regarded as the fifth vital sign [12,13,14] and as important as the other vital signs [15]. Assessment of pain is the first and most important step in pain management [4, 16,17,18,19]. It is notable that assessing pain decreases overtreatment and treatment-related adverse effects [16, 17, 20]. Pain assessment must be considered on admission, after a change in medical status, prior to, during, and after procedures [17]. A comprehensive assessment of pain requires subjective and objective data, self-reports, and assessment tools [17]. Actually, a patient’s self-report of pain is the most valid method of assessing pain in a patient who can communicate [6, 21, 22]. Moreover, patients' vital signs are part of a comprehensive pain assessment [16, 22,23,24]. Because the vital signs cannot distinguish pain from other types of suffering, they are utilized as a complement in pain assessment [22]. Additionally, during pain assessment, health care providers should also pay attention to patients’ behavior, such as facial expressions and gestures [25, 26]. Furthermore, assessment results must be documented and disseminated to all those involved in a patient's care [12, 17].

Nurses are in a unique position to support patients who are experiencing pain [4, 10, 27, 28]. Nurses play a vital role in providing pain assessment and management [16]. Besides, in order to effectively manage pain, a nurse must accurately measure the patient's experience of pain [8, 17, 18]. In addition, nurses should use a consistent and methodical approach to pain exploration [17]. Furthermore, nurses should consider pain assessment principles while using assessment techniques and instruments [25].

In many clinical contexts, pain is not assessed in a standardized manner [29]. Implementing the principles of pain assessment remains a challenge for many nurses [30, 31]. Several studies from developed countries pointed out that nurses’ pain assessments vary across regions, with some reports suggesting poor compliance among nurses in recording and reporting pain assessment findings [31,32,33,34,35]. On the other hand, problems of applying the standard of pain assessment were shown to be more prominent in low-income countries [36]. Moreover, African patients are less likely to verbalize their pain because expressing pain is seen as an act of weakness [37]. Thus, African regions suffer from a double burden of pain assessment from nurses’ and patients’ sides. Furthermore, similar results were reported from studies of African countries [15, 25, 38, 39], indicating poor adherence to the principles of pain assessment. Besides, the previous few and inconsistent studies in Ethiopia showed that pain assessment practice among nurses was from 24.4% to 55.9% [39,40,41].

Being a male nurse, having low work experience, a lower educational level, lack of training on pain management, lack of organizational support, and absence of pain management guidelines were associated with nurses’ poor pain assessment practice [39,40,41,42].

Previous studies in Ethiopia have mainly focused on pain management, other than pain assessment practice. Thus, there is very limited and inconsistent evidence on pain assessment practice among nurses in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to identify pain assessment practice and associated factors among nurses working at adult care units in the Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia.

Methods

Study area and period

The study was conducted in Wolaita Zone in Southern Ethiopia. Currently, the Zone has six public hospitals, 67 health centers, and 342 health posts. The hospitals provide outpatient, emergency treatment, surgery, delivery, laboratory, and pharmacy services. The total nursing staff in hospitals was 596, of which 290 nurses were in adult care units. The study was conducted from February to March 2021 in public health facilities in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia.

Study design

An institution-based cross-sectional study design was used.

Study population

All nurses working in adult care units in public hospitals in the Wolaita Zone during the data collection period.

Eligibility criteria

All nurses who were working in adult care units (medical ward, surgical ward, triage, emergency department, and intensive care units) participated in the study; nurses who were available during the data collection period and nurses working in the units for a minimum of six months were included.

Sample size and determination

A single population proportion formula was used to calculate the sample size by using the following assumptions: The magnitude of good assessment practice was 57.1% from the previous study in Northern Ethiopia [41] with a margin of error of 5%, 95% confidence interval, and a 10% non-response rate. Finally, the required sample size was found to be 414. But only 290 nurses were working in adult care units in public hospitals during data collection. Therefore, all nurses working in six public hospitals were selected for the study.

Sampling technique and procedure

All nurses working in six public hospitals were included in the study. A total enumeration was used because the calculated sample was greater than the total population of the study areas.

Data collection tools and procedures

Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The data collection tool was adopted from literature [39,40,41, 43]. The questionnaire addressed the following sections: socio-demographic characteristics and organizational factors, and practice assessing questions. Eight yes-or-no questions were used to identify nurses’ pain assessment practice. The response ‘’yes’’ indicated good practice, and the response ‘’no’’ was used to denote non-adherence to good practice. The data were collected by six trained nurses who had prior experience in data collection. Three supervisors oversaw the data collection process.

Operational definition of terms

Good practice: nurses who reported an adherence of 70% or higher to the questions assessing pain assessment practice [40].

Poor practice: nurses who reported less than 70% adherence to the questions assessing pain assessment practice [40].

Study variables

Dependent variable

Nurses’ pain assessment practice.

Independent variables

Age, marital status, educational level, work experience, working unit, pain management training, pain management guidelines availability, perceived organizational support, and reading pain-related references and journal articles.

Data collection instrument quality assurance

The questionnaire was pre-tested on 5% of the total sample size outside of the hospitals before one week of data collection. The wording of the questionnaire and the time allocated to complete the questionnaire were modified based on the pre-test results.

Data processing and analysis

Before entering data, the data were checked for completeness, then entered into Epi Data version 4.6, and analyzed with SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics were done to see the overall distribution of study participants. The association between each independent variable and the dependent variable was checked by using binary logistic regression. All variables with a P ≤ 0.25 in the binary logistic regression analysis were taken to multiple logistic regression analysis to control the possible confounders. Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval and a P-value ≤ 0.05 was declared statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Addis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery. An official letter was submitted to the Wolaita Zone Health Office, and approval was obtained from the organizations before data collection. All subjects provided written informed consent. And confidentiality of the information was maintained throughout the study.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics and organizational factors

A total of 267 nurses participated in the study, giving a response rate of 97.8%. The mean age of the respondents was 28.7 (3.74 SD), with a minimum and maximum age of 22 and 42 years, respectively. The respondents had a mean of 5.4 years (2.9 SD) of work experience with a minimum and maximum of 1 and 16 years, respectively, as shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics and organizational factors of nurses working in adult care units at public hospitals, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 267)
Full size table

Nurses’ pain assessment practice

Almost three-fourths, 197(73.8%), of the study nurses reported that they assessed pain for their patients. Nearly two-thirds (76.4%) of the study participants did not discuss pain scores during a nurse-to-nurse report, as shown in Table 2 below.

Table 2 Pain assessment practice among nurses working in adult care units at public hospitals, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 267)
Full size table

Out of 267 nurses who participated in the study, 102 nurses had good pain assessment practice, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pain assessment practice among nurses working at adult care units in public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 267)

Full size image

Multivariable analysis

The nurses who had training on pain management and perceived organizational support were twice as likely to have good pain assessment practice, as shown in Table 3 below.

Table 3 Multivariable regression analysis of nurses’ pain assessment practice among nurses working in adult care units at public hospitals, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 267)
Full size table

Discussion

The majority of the nurses in this study, 73.8%, reported that they assessed pain for their patients. The result was higher than the findings of previous studies in Ethiopia [39, 41]. However, a higher magnitude was reported from other African countries [44, 45]. The discrepancy could be explained by the small sample size in the previous study in Ethiopia, and the study nurses from other African countries were from critical care units, so they may have had training and clinical skills in pain assessment.

The present study showed that 53.2% of nurses in the study used pain assessment tools. The finding was congruent with a study from Rwanda [45]. Nevertheless, the magnitude of this study was higher than several reports from Ethiopia and other African countries [15, 25, 39, 41]. These disparities could be attributable to the small sample size of the previous studies and differences in the instruments used for pain assessment.

In the current study, less than half (47.2%) of the study nurses documented pain assessment scores. The result was in accordance with findings reported by [31, 41, 45]. Contrary to the finding, studies from Africa and Asia [42,43,44] demonstrated lower results. The differences might be clarified by small sample sizes, and a non-probability purposive sampling technique was used in the previous studies.

According to this study, less than one-fourth (23.6%) of the study nurses discussed pain assessment scores during a nurse-to-nurse report. This suggests that the majority of nurses failed to report pain assessment scores. Several reports from other countries, including Ethiopia [15, 25, 40, 41] pointed out higher results than this study. It is by now generally accepted that discussing a patient’s pain assessment findings with a health care team is critical to advancing a patient's care.

In this study, the proportion of nurses with good pain assessment practice was found to be 38.2%. The result ties well with a previous study in Ethiopia [41]. Contrary to the findings, studies [33, 34, 39] and [40] reported a lower and higher magnitude, respectively. The possible reasons for the discrepancy could be due to some of the previous studies with smaller sample sizes and differences in a tool used for pain assessment practice. Moreover, the study [40] was conducted among nurses working in critical care units that might have better pain assessment skills.

The odds of having good pain assessment practice among nurses who received training on pain management was two times higher than its counterpart. This was consistent with what has been found in other African countries [25, 45]. However, having training on pain management was not associated with pain assessment practice, according to the study [40]. A similar conclusion was reached by previous studies wherein a lack of training on pain management leads to poor pain assessment practice [6, 46,47,48,49].

Finally, this study found a connection between nurses' pain assessment practice and perceived organizational support [AOR (1.9(1.2–3.23)]. This indicates that nurses who perceived organizational support were twice more likely to assess pain than those who did not. The finding was verified by previous studies [30, 43, 47]. Furthermore, providing organizational assistance allows nurses to improve their pain assessment skills [25, 50].

Conclusion

Nurses’ pain assessment practice was found to be low. Moreover, most nurses did not discuss pain assessment scores during a nurse-to-nurse report. The problem of reporting pain is magnified by low documentation practice, which was below half. Continuous professional development through in-service training and education, and improving organizational support through good leadership are crucial to ameliorating nurses’ pain assessment practice. The management of the hospitals should continually support nurses through a supportive working environment and supervision. Future studies should address organizational and health service-related barriers in pain assessment. And reviewing records from patients’ charts to get a complete picture of pain assessment should be considered.

Limitations of the study

This study might be subjected to self-report bias, and a record review from patients’ charts was not taken to get a complete picture of pain assessment practice. Another limitation of this study is that the study did not identify pain assessment tools used by nurses.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rathnayake KM, Madushani P, Silva K. Use of dietary diversity score as a proxy indicator of nutrient adequacy of rural elderly people in Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Treede R-D. The international association for the study of pain definition of pain: as valid in 2018 as in 1979, but in need of regularly updated footnotes. Pain Rep. 2018;3(2):e643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oldewage-Theron WH, Kruger R. Food variety and dietary diversity as indicators of the dietary adequacy and health status of an elderly population in Sharpeville, South Africa. J Nutr Elder. 2008;27(1–2):101–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox F. Advances in the pharmacological management of acute and chronic pain. Nurs Stand (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987). 2018;33(3):37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hennessee P. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward pain management: Gardner-Webb University. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Onianwa PO, Alonge TO, Otegbayo JA, Ike EU, Chukura FO, Are OO, et al. Pain as 5th vital sign: impact of pain assessment training program on Nigerian nurses knowledge of pain management. Int J NursMidwifery. 2017;9(11):129–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belay Bizuneh Y, FitiwiLema G, YilkalFentie D, WoldegerimaBerhe Y, Enyew Ashagrie H. Assessment of patient’s satisfaction and associated factors regarding postoperative pain management at the University of Gondar Compressive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020:8834807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhakta HC, Marco CA. Pain management: association with patient satisfaction among emergency department patients. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(4):456–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khawaja SA. Prevalence, progression, severity, and predictors of postoperative pain in adult patients admitted in the surgical wards at Iringa regional referral hospital: The University of Dodoma. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Samarkandi OA. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward pain management. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(2):220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tequare MH, Huntzicker JJ, GideyMhretu H, Zelelew YB, Abraha HE, Tsegay MA, et al. Pain management and its possible implementation research in North Ethiopia: a before and after study. Adv Med. 2020;2020:5317352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grantham D, Brown S. Pain assessment and management, clinical practice guidelines. Montreal: Winnipeg Regional Health Authority; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morone NE, Weiner DK. Pain as the fifth vital sign: exposing the vital need for pain education. Clin Ther. 2013;35(11):1728–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertagnolli A. Pain: The 5th vital sign. Patient Care for the Nurse Practitioner. 2004. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA137231137&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15264769&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E60fc8eb1.

  15. Imoro MA. Practice of pain assessment in critically Ill patients among nurses at the tamale teaching hospital. Divers J Multidiscip Res. 2019;1(1):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen H-J, Chen Y-M. Pain assessment: validation of the physiologic indicators in the ventilated adult patient. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16(2):105–11.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. RN.com. Understanding and Managing Pain. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schroeder DL, Hoffman LA, Fioravanti M, Medley DP, Zullo TG, Tuite PK. Enhancing nurses’ pain assessment to improve patient satisfaction. Orthop Nurs. 2016;35(2):108–17.

  19. Gélinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):420–7.  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fink R, editor Pain assessment: the cornerstone to optimal pain management. Baylor university medical center proceedings: Taylor & Francis; 2000. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1317046/.

  21. Dudgeon D, King S, Howell D, Green E, Gilbert J, Hughes E, et al. Cancer care Ontario’s experience with implementation of routine physical and psychological symptom distress screening. Psychooncology. 2012;21(4):357–64.

  22. Herr K, Coyne PJ, McCaffery M, Manworren R, Merkel S. Pain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Manag Nurs. 2011;12(4):230–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gélinas C, Dasta JF, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kotfis K, Strzelbicka M, Zegan-Barańska M, Safranow K, Brykczyński M, Żukowski M, et al. Validation of the behavioral pain scale to assess pain intensity in adult, intubated postcardiac surgery patients: a cohort observational study-POL-BPS. Medicine. 2018;97(38):e12443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kizza IB. Nurses’ knowledge and practices related to pain assessment in critically ill patients at Mulago hospital. Uganda: Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Arif-Rahu M, Grap MJ. Facial expression and pain in the critically ill non-communicative patient: state of science review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010;26(6):343–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewthwaite BJ, Jabusch KM, Wheeler BJ, Schnell-Hoehn KN, Mills J, Estrella-Holder E, et al. Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management in hospitalized adults. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2011;42(6):251–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vickers N. Knowledge and attitudes regarding pain among surgical nurses in three teaching hospitals in Ireland: Dublin City University. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kwon JH. Overcoming barriers in cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(16):1727–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ladak SS, McPhee C, Muscat M, Robinson S, Kastanias P, Snaith K, et al. The journey of the pain resource nurse in improving pain management practices: understanding role implementation. 2013;14(2):68–73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23688360/.

  31. Aydede M. Defending the IASP definition of pain. Monist. 2017;100(4):439–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Alnajar MK, Shudifat R, Mosleh SM, Ismaile S, N'erat M, Amro KJTONJ. Pain Assessment and Management in Intensive Care Unit: Nurses' Practices, Perceived Influencing Factors, and Educational Needs. 2021;15(1). https://opennursingjournal.com/VOLUME/15/PAGE/170/FULLTEXT/.

  33. Angeletti C, Guetti C, Paesani M, Colavincenzo S, Ciccozzi A, Angeletti PMJPR, et al. An analysis of Italian nurses’ approach to patients’ pain: a nationwide online survey. 2018;2018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29849844/.

  34. Olišarová V, Dvořáková V, Tóthová VJCEJNM. Pain assessment in surgical patients in the South Bohemia region. 2020;11:62–9. https://cejnm.osu.cz/pdfs/cjn/2020/02/04.pdf.

  35. Rose L, Smith O, Gélinas C, Haslam L, Dale C, Luk E, et al. Critical care nurses’ pain assessment and management practices: a survey in Canada. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21(4):251–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grunauer M, Mikesell C, Bustamante G, Cobo G, Sánchez S, Román AM, et al. Pain assessment and management in pediatric intensive care units around the world, an international, multicenter study. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:746489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Walters MAJPPL. Pain assessment in sub-Saharan Africa. 2009;11(3):22–6. http://ppl.childpain.org/issues/v11n3_2009/v11n3_walters.pdf.

  38. Klopper H, Andersson H, Minkkinen M, Ohlsson C, Sjöström BJI, Nursing CC. Strategies in assessing post operative pain—A South African study. 2006;22(1):12–21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16005235/.

  39. Tadesse F, Yohannes Z, Beza L. Knowledge and practice of pain assessment and management and factors associated with nurses’ working at Hawassa University Referral Hospital, Hawassa city, South Ethiopia. Res Rev: J Health Prof. 2016;6(3):24–8.

  40. Ayenew T, Melaku B, Gedfew M, Amha H, Bishaw KA. Nurses’ knowledge, practice, and associated factors of pain assessment in critically ill adult patients at public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2021;15:100361.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Birhan E. The practice of nurses and associated factors towards pain assessment in critically Ill adult patients in referral hospitals of Amhara Region, Ethiopia, 2019. J Intensive Crit Care. 2020;6(4):16.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mondol S, Muhammad F, Chowdhury A. Nurses’ knowledge and practices related to pain assessment in critically ill patients in a selected private hospital in Bangladesh. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(10):4219–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Masaba R. Knowledge, Attitude And Practice Regarding Pain Assessment In Cancer Patients Among Nurses At Uganda Cancer Institute-Mulago: International Health Sciences University. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kizza I, Muliira J. Nurses’ pain assessment practices with critically ill adult patients. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62(4):573–82.

  45. Tuyishimire ML. Assessment of nurses’ knowledge and practices towards pain assessment in critically ill patients at CHUK (2016–2017): University of Rwanda. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. Assessment and Management of Pain. 3rd ed. Toronto, ON: Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dutt SD. Examining Knowledge of Pain Management. 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Turk DC, Melzack R. The measurement of pain and the assessment of people experiencing pain. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ben Natan M, Ataneli M, Admenko A, Har NR. Nurse assessment of residents’ pain in a long-term care facility. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(2):251–7.

  50. Rose L, Haslam L, Dale C, Knechtel L, Fraser M, Pinto R, et al. Survey of assessment and management of pain for critically ill adults. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2011;27(3):121–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Arba Minch University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolaita Zone study health facilities, study participants, and data collectors for their support and coordination for the success of this study.

Funding

This study did not receive any funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tikur Ambesa Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Badeg Melile Mengesha

  2. School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia

    Fikre Moga Lencha & Lankamo Ena Digesa

Authors
  1. Badeg Melile Mengesha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fikre Moga Lencha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lankamo Ena Digesa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BM: study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and draft manuscript preparation. FM study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of results, and draft manuscript preparation. LE study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of results, and draft manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lankamo Ena Digesa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed following the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Addis Ababa University. All subjects provided written informed consent and confidentiality of the information was maintained throughout the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melile Mengesha, B., Moga Lencha, F. & Ena Digesa, L. Pain assessment practice and associated factors among nurses working at adult care units in public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2021. BMC Nurs 21, 115 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00892-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00892-4

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us