Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nurse-led consultations reinforced with eHealth technology: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients with gynecological cancer

BMC Nursing volume 21, Article number: 326 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

During the last decade, the health care profession has moved toward personalized care and has focused on the diversity of survivorship needs after initial cancer treatment. Health care providers encourage empowering patients to participate actively in their own health management and survivorship. Consequently, we developed and piloted a new follow-up model for patients at a Norwegian hospital, referred to as the Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology (LETSGO) model. Using LETSGO, a dedicated nurse replaces the physician in every second follow-up consultation, providing patients who have undergone cancer treatment with self-management techniques that are reinforced with eHealth technology via a specially designed app. Encouraging behavioral change and evaluating the late effects of treatment and recurrence symptoms are central components of self-management techniques. In addition, the app encourages physical activity and positive lifestyle changes, helps identify recurrence-related symptoms, and provides reminders of activity goals. This study aims to investigate experiences with nurse-led consultations supported by eHealth technology among the patients who piloted the LETSGO intervention.

Methods

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to analyze the participants’ experiences with the LETSGO intervention after six to seven months.

Results

The participants in the LETSGO pilot felt safe and well cared for. They thought the nurse was less busy than the doctors appear to be, which made it easy for them to share any cancer-related challenges. Many participants reported increased empowerment and confidence in recognizing symptoms of cancer recurrence, and participants who used the app regularly were motivated to increase their physical activity levels. However, the participants also experienced some limitations and technical errors with the app.

Conclusions

Generally, the participants positively received the nurse-led consultations and eHealth technology, but an intervention study is required for further evaluation. In addition, the reported technical app errors should be resolved and tested prior to eHealth application implementation. Regardless, this study may be useful in planning personalized survivorship care studies.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03453788. Registration March 5, 2018.

Peer Review reports

Background

Traditional cancer follow-up care has been criticized for focusing more on recurrence detection and less on the physical and psychological consequences of cancer and cancer treatments [1]. In addition, the population continues to age, and more patients live with and beyond cancer because of improved treatments. Therefore, the demand for already strained health care resources has increased [2, 3]. Thus, traditional follow-up care for cancer must change. Cancer services have increasingly focused on the benefits of patient empowerment and self-management in the cancer survivorship trajectory [4, 5]. Patient empowerment enables patients to manage life aspects that are important to their health and health care [6], while self-management allows patients to take responsibility for their own well-being and lifestyle behavior, including medical and emotional issues that may arise after an illness [7]. Patient education regarding survivorship issues facilitates targeted, personalized health care that aligns with survivors’ needs and encourages them to take responsibility for their own health [4, 8, 9].

Endometrial cancer, the most common gynecological cancer, is associated with obesity and weight-related comorbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension [10]. Lifestyle changes, including physical activity and healthy nutrition, can enhance the quality of life and reduce the risk of cancer recurrence among survivors of gynecological cancers [11,12,13]. Thus, the promotion of patient education and self-management that includes a focus on physical activity can increase patients’ knowledge of and involvement in their disease management and can educate them about the key signs of recurrence. Informed patients who actively participate in their own care receive higher quality treatment than traditional approaches [8, 14]. However, consistent guidelines and strategies for implementing self-management among survivors of gynecological cancers in a clinical setting have yet to be developed.

Nurse-led consultations conducted via telephone or in person can alleviate time-restrained physician resources. In addition, these consultations lead to high satisfaction among patients, improving their trust in the health care provided and encouraging them to engage in their treatment and care plans [15, 16]. Furthermore, studies of nurse-led consultations report improved or equal quality-of-life outcomes among survivors of gynecological cancer compared to traditional follow-up care [16,17,18,19,20]. In addition, nurse-led counseling can improve sexual functioning in survivors of gynecological cancers [20, 21].

For example, a randomized controlled trial of survivors of ovarian cancer compared nurse-led physical activity coaching to traditional care controls [22], where the intervention group experienced a significant reduction in cancer-related fatigue and depression compared to the control group. Another randomized controlled trial compared follow-up care via nurse-led telephone consultations to traditional physician-led, hospital-based consultations in patients with FIGO stage I endometrial cancer [23]. When compared to the physician-led group, participants in the nurse-led group experienced greater patient satisfaction and suffered no detriment to anxiety and quality-of-life measures or delayed recurrence detection. Hence, the researchers argued that nurse-led consultations can replace or complement physician-led consultations without increasing patient anxiety or reducing satisfaction with the provided service.

Technology is rapidly evolving in the industrialized world, and it offers nearly unlimited possibilities. Electronic technology used for health care (i.e., eHealth technology) has significant potential to improve quality and safety in health care [24]. The use of eHealth in active cancer care and survivorship is also increasing [25], because it provides a way to tailor information, feedback, and self-monitoring options and to ease communication with health care professionals [26]. Various eHealth modalities, such as mobile phone applications, have shown promising results in improving patient engagement in self-management [27, 28].

Our research group developed LETSGO, a new follow-up model for patients with gynecological cancer. The main objective of this model is to increase patient involvement and personalized care by utilizing nurse resources and consequently reduce the number of consultations with oncologic physicians [29]. The LETSGO model schedules alternating nurse-led and traditional physician-led follow-up consultations, as described in Table 1, and the eHealth technology reinforces nurse-led consultations with a specially designed smartphone application (the LETSGO app) and activity tracker, as described in Table 2. We piloted the LETSGO model over a six-month period in a medium-sized Norwegian hospital, where one specially trained nurse conducted all the nurse-led consultations. Within three weeks of inclusion in the LETSGO pilot, the participants were scheduled for their first nurse-led consultations. The nurse used motivational interviews and behavioral change techniques to empower patients to be more active in their post-cancer care. The participants were scheduled for traditional physician-led consultations three months after their inclusion in the pilot, and they were scheduled for another nurse-led consultation after six months, which continued the same approach from the initial nurse-led consultations (see Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 LETSGO Pilot
Full size table
Table 2 LETSGO Application Content
Full size table

There are promising results of nurse-led care and eHealth technology among cancer patients, but qualitative research on these approaches is limited among patients with gynecological cancer. As the LETSGO trial piloted a novel follow-up model for patients with gynecological cancer, the aim of this study was to investigate the experiences with nurse-led consultations supported by eHealth technology among the patients who piloted the LETSGO intervention.

Methods

Study design

For our qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with participants in the LETSGO pilot based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research [30]. We developed a thematic interview guide that focused on the participants experiences with the nurse-led consultations and the mobile application (see Appendix 1).

Following Lindseth and Norberg’s (2004) method, two researchers interpreted the data using the phenomenological hermeneutic approach [31]. Lindseth and Norberg explained, “In this tradition it has become obvious that essential meaning is something with which humans are familiar in the practices of life, and this familiarity has to be expressed through the way of living, through actions, through narratives and through reflection” (31, p. 146). In research, the lived experience (the phenomenological approach) must be fixed in the text, and the narratives subsequently require interpretation (the hermeneutical approach) [31, 32].

Participants

Treating specialists invited the participants in the LETSGO pilot to participate in the interview study. All participants received written information regarding the study and consent forms. The study used the following inclusion criteria: patients who were enrolled in the LETSGO pilot, who understood and read Norwegian, who had no cognitive barriers, and who provided informed consent. The interview study did not have any exclusion criteria. Of the 17 eligible participants, 12 patients accepted the invitation and participated in the interview study. Two of the patients who declined participation did not wish to be interviewed, and the other three patients did not provide a reason.

Data collection

Two female researchers who did not know the patients conducted face-to-face interviews in a hospital setting between October and November 2018. The primary interviewer (BJ) was a nurse and associate professor from a nearby university, and the secondary interviewer (MS) was a medical doctor and Ph.D. candidate from the hospital in which the study was conducted. The secondary interviewer was present in all the interviews and asked supplementary questions for a better understanding when necessary. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and each interview lasted between 18 and 41 min (median = 25.5 min). The semi-structured interview guide covered topics related to the nurse-led consultations, the LETSGO mobile app, and the participants’ physical activities during the pilot period. The interviewers asked questions regarding these topics and instructed the participants to describe their experiences freely. The interviewers encouraged further narration and reflection by asking such questions as “What happened next?” and “What did you feel?” The participants steered the conversation without prompting from the interviewers [31, 33].

Data analysis

We used the phenomenological hermeneutic approach described by Lindseth and Norberg for data analysis [31]. In the first phase, we performed a naïve reading of the transcribed interviews. To capture the full meaning, we read the text multiple times with an open mind to allow it to speak to us [31].

During the second phase, we used Lindseth and Norberg definition of a theme: “A theme is a thread of meaning that penetrates text parts, either all or just a few. In order to capture this meaning of lived experience we do not formulate the themes as abstract concepts, but rather as condensed descriptions. We formulate them in a way that discloses meaning” (31, p. 149). Thereafter, we performed structural analyses to identify the descriptions and formulate and organize these into themes.

During the third phase, we summarized and reflected on the themes in relation to the research questions and the study context [31]. We developed this comprehensive understanding by considering the authors’ preconceptions, naïve readings, structural analyses, and relevant literature. When any doubt or disagreement arose, we reviewed the transcribed interviews and engaged in new discussions, and we eventually reached a consensus for all interpretations. This repetitive process enabled us to develop a broader understanding of the patients’ experiences with the nurse-led consultations and the app, and the analytical process resulted in four themes.

Ethical considerations

The study conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants received verbal and written information about the qualitative study methods and aims, and they consented to participate in writing. The participants were free to withdraw their consent at any time, without justification and without consequences to their follow-up care, and all were given the opportunity to choose to be interviewed by the primary interviewer only. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics of South East Norway (2017/2195) approved the study, and it was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03453788) on March 5, 2018.

Results

Study population

The 12 interviewed participants were 35–74 years old and had been treated for uterine, ovarian, cervical, or vulvar cancer of FIGO stages I, II, or III. The median age was 51.5 years. Eleven patients had received surgical treatment, half had undergone additional chemotherapy, and some had received radiation therapy. Most women in the pilot had finished their treatment less than two years prior to their participation therein, and some participants had previously been treated for cancer recurrence, with no signs of active disease.

Interview results

The participants explained that they participated in the study to support research and development in the area of cancer care. As we considered the results from the analyses, we divided them into four themes (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Interview themes

Full size image

These themes illustrate that although the app experienced some technical issues, the patients gained useful knowledge of cancer survivorship and lifestyle changes while feeling reassured and well cared for in the LETSGO pilot. The theme “satisfaction with the provided care” highlights that the participants trusted the nurse’s expertise and care, while the theme “increased focus on physical activity” reflects the participants’ expressed motivation to become more physically active. Further, the theme “user-friendliness of the LETSGO application” identifies perceptions that the app was an easily accessible information tool, but also problems the participants encountered with the app software, and the theme “feeling of increased self-management” captures the participants’ perceptions of their ability to recognize concerning symptoms. The participants primarily discussed their experiences with nurse-led consultations.

Satisfaction with the provided care

When asked about their overall opinions on partially nurse-led consultations and the use of eHealth technology, the participants expressed the importance of feeling safe. The participants appeared open-minded and to have great trust in the health care system. The nurse-led consultations were perceived as an appropriate and useful alternative to traditional physician-led consultations, and the participants found it easy to initiate contact with the nurse. They described the nurse as educated and qualified, and they felt they could discuss physical, psychological, and lifestyle concerns with her. The participants found it comfortable and soothing to see the same nurse when they returned for consultations, and the relationship they had established with the nurse was relaxed, as stated by a participant:

“She had lots of knowledge, and I thought it was good to have someone to talk to. It is nice to know you are taken seriously.” Participant 11

During the nurse-led consultations, the participants discussed achievable physical activities based on their interests and abilities. They were happy to learn that even small increases in activities may produce health benefits. Because of the nurse’s invitation to present concerns freely, the women could find the nurse-led consultations too short in duration to discuss their many survivor-related issues adequately. If having the perception that discussing concerns with a doctor might interfere with the doctor’s limited resources, the participants found it easier to talk with the nurse. Further, the option of calling a nurse between visits if concerns arose could be relieving, and the nurse was regarded as a screening gateway for symptoms that could spare physician resources if examinations were considered unnecessary:

“When you know that if there is something and you can meet a nurse . . . then you don’t have to steal time from the doctor, if you don’t really need it.” Participant 2

The fact that the app provided a contact number if the participants had questions or worries was appreciated, as it provided the opportunity to relieve anxiety related to participant concerns and gave a pleasing feeling of being taken seriously.

Reflections on the need for physical examinations varied. The participants expressed relief in not having to undergo more than one physical examination in a six-month period, and they felt confident in replacing some physician-led consultations with nurse-led consultations. However, more frequent physical examinations could also be perceived as reassuring:

“I just think that all of a sudden there can be something there that you haven’t noticed. Like how they found [the malignant tumor] in my case, and I hadn’t noticed.” Participant 8

While some participants believed they did not need nurse-led appointments between the physical examinations, others found it reassuring to talk to a nurse, and they felt confident that the nurse would consult the physician if necessary.

Increased focus on physical activity

The encouragement to set a weekly activity goal and log achievements in the app motivated the women to become more physically active. However, the app’s physical activity module could be considered too basic and uninspiring compared to other training apps. For example, participants could enter only one weekly goal into the app, which limited the participants’ focus to that one activity. Furthermore, some of the younger participants wanted a graphic display of their achieved activities. These limitations could lead to discontinued use of the LETSGO app’s physical activity segment. In contrast, the participants appreciated the activity tracker, reporting that it motivated and encouraged them to walk or run, which helped them reach their daily step goals:

“I used the activity tracker. So, if I hadn’t walked enough steps to meet the goal I’d set, then I just went for another walk to reach my goal.” Participant 6

The participants reflected on how using the activity tracker not only increased their own physical activity but also motivated others around them to become more physically active. Those who refrained from using the activity tracker faulted the device’s design and its inability to register steps from bicycling.

User-friendliness of the LETSGO application

Overall, the app was considered user-friendly and easily accessible. It provided concise information on the cancer disease, as well as links to recommended websites if the participants wanted further information:

“I read everything. I think the information was excellent—good to know that there’s a place to obtain valid information, not just Google.” Participant 4

Usage of the LETSGO app varied among participants. Regular use of the app was prominent, but consistently reading and hearing about the disease could also make participants feel overly conscious of and defined by the disease:

“You don’t get healthy, reading about illnesses, you know.” Participant 7.

There were different opinions regarding the app’s content. Many participants wanted the app to contain more detailed information on their disease, and they thought the sections regarding nutrition advice and relaxation exercises were not as useful.

During the interviews, the participants identified several software issues with the app. One specific issue limited positive encouragements from the app. In addition, physical activity had to be manually entered into the app before noon the following day. If the participants entered their achievements too late, they did not receive credit for reaching their goals. The participants also emphasized that it was inconvenient that they had to enter the number of steps from the activity tracker manually, and they shared ideas on useful app improvements:

“Ideally, I wish the activity tracker was connected to the app. If I wanted to really evaluate activities and get motivated and such, then I used the Garmin app as well to see how far I had run.” Participant 10.

It appeared that monthly reminders to submit answers to the recurrence-specific questions could fail to appear on the participants’ mobile device screens. There could be app freezes, or the participants could be dismissed from the app during the symptom evaluation. In these situations, the participants perceived the app as a less useful tool for helping them evaluate whether their current health status was concerning with regard to disease recurrence.

Feeling of increased Self-management

Knowing what to look for after participating in the nurse-led consultations and engaging in monthly symptom ratings in the app relaxed the women and made them feel safe. The participants reported that they had gained new and important insights regarding their cancer diagnosis:

“When I finished the cancer treatment, I didn’t know that symptoms were an important way of discovering a recurrence. I thought that it would be by a CT scan and examinations at the hospital, I mean, what the doctors do. But then I was taught to be more aware of my body.” Participant 12

Similarly, the app was experienced as reassuring, and the regular symptom questions provided a feeling of security, mainly because symptom scoring gave the participants an opportunity to rate their own health condition:

“Aha, that could be a sign of something wrong. I didn’t know that!” Participant 9.

The participants also thought that knowing what to do and whom to call was reassuring. Participants who reported feeling healthy and cured tended to disregard information about their diagnosis and found the symptom questions irrelevant. The participants expressed that it was important for the nurse to provide a clear goal for the appointments, such as the objective of empowering participants in self-managing the physical and psychological aspects of their cancer survivorship. Those who considered themselves talkative were concerned that their talkativeness prevented the nurse from discussing scheduled topics during their consultations. Although the participants expressed overall confidence in the follow-up model, not everyone felt prepared to take responsibility for monitoring the potential symptoms of cancer recurrence:

“You are supposed to monitor symptoms yourself, but how can you monitor your own genitals? You may be able to see bleeding or if you gain weight, but you can’t check yourself.” Participant 8

A suggested improvement from a participant was for health care providers to receive and evaluate the symptom scores and physical activity achievements the participants submitted:

“I would have liked if what I registered in the app was seen by someone on the other end. One believes that it will be sent out, and when it isn’t, then it’s not that valuable.” Participant 3

Discussion

The participants felt safe during the nurse-led follow-up consultations, and the communication with the nurse was perceived as valuable because the nurse seemed experienced and was not as busy as physicians appeared. This result aligns with a study conducted in the UK, which reported that survivors of ovarian cancer with three years of nurse-led telephonic follow-up care found that “time was never an issue” and that “somebody was looking out for [them]” [34]. Researchers who assessed survivors of endometrial and lymphoma cancer also found nurse-led appointments to be helpful, because the survivors’ experiences with nurses contrasted their perception of physicians as being too busy or less interested when contacted for support and reassurance [16, 23, 35]. Our participants found the nurse-led consultations and the app informative, and several of these services could correct the misconception that only physical exams or imaging scans reveal recurrences. The interviewed participants perceived the app’s monthly reminder to rate recurrence-associated symptoms in the app, as well as the advice to call the treating nurse if the entered symptoms related to an increased risk of recurrence, as useful and reassuring. The participants reported that learning to monitor their own bodies and health for symptoms could help them identify recurrences or other concerns that they should discuss with their health care providers. Our findings indicate that learning about cancer, expressing concerns, and deciding on survivorship care are important factors in increasing the empowerment of cancer survivors [36].

However, not all LETSGO participants understood the empowerment aspect of the app, and the app could be disregarded by participants who felt well and that they did not need it. These patients may have dismissed beneficial knowledge of alarming symptoms. If a recurrence was to occur later, the lack of knowledge for these participants could possibly delay their contact with health care providers. In addition, some patients may not want to know all the details of their illness, and some perceive regular reminders of their illness as counteractive to rehabilitation. Providing more information to patients who cope in this manner may increase their stress levels [37]. Consequently, information must be tailored to match the needs of survivors of gynecological cancer to prevent the infliction of harmful stress [38].

Because eHealth technology can identify a problem and guide appropriate action, it is a powerful and expanding technological tool that may be beneficial in health care settings [39]. This technology can reduce the number of face-to-face consultations, easing overburdened health care services in a cost-effective and useful manner [40]. Using eHealth technology has led to improved survival [41] and reduced hospital admissions [41, 42] among cancer survivors. However, there is limited knowledge of the benefits of eHealth technology for survivors of gynecological cancer. Generally, patients welcome eHealth technology to support empowerment and self-management [43]. Overall, the participants in the present study, regardless of their cancer diagnosis, found the app and activity tracker useful, although younger participants thought the app was limited and uninspiring compared to established nonmedical apps. This result highlights the potential value of additional studies on the use of eHealth technology among survivors of gynecological cancer.

The participants’ feedback regarding the failures of the app was also useful. Technical issues that cause the app to malfunction may fail to alert survivors of important actions or result in dissatisfaction with the app, leading to discontinued use [44, 45]. In addition, it is important to balance easy-to-use functionality that enables use by patients who are less accustomed to technology with visually appealing content that enhances user engagement [44]. Studies conducted among health care professionals have indicated an increased workload is a major concern with implementing eHealth technology in clinical practice [43]. Thus, it is important to test the app extensively, solve any problems, and establish well-functioning technical support before implementing the app in daily practice [25].

The pilot participants were instructed to enter symptoms and physical activity achievements into the LETSGO app. However, not all found this exercise meaningful, knowing that the data were not shared with the responsible health care providers. Similarly, the participants could fail to perceive patient education as an important aspect of logging physical activity achievements. Thus, to ensure patient commitment and the optimal effects of self-management interventions in a clinical setting, it is important to remind patients repeatedly why symptom evaluation and physical activity goal setting are encouraged. Another raised concern was that reading and hearing about one’s disease may make patients feel overly conscious of and defined by their disease, despite feeling well. This is an important aspect that must be considered when planning future follow-up care. This viewpoint is consistent with reports from other studies that have identified a significant variance among cancer survivors regarding their need for information [46, 47], and it indicates the importance of not inflicting greater worry or stress through patient education, even when well-intentioned. Nurse-led consultations that use motivational interviews to encourage patient reflection on lifestyle changes and survivorship needs, combined with eHealth technology, can be an effective strategy for personalizing care and optimizing survivorship trajectories. However, this model of follow-up care after cancer treatment should be tested in larger intervention studies.

Strengths and limitations

A strength of the present study was the diversity in the participants’ demographical characteristics in terms of their age, gynecological diagnoses, cancer stage, and comfort level with smartphone use. The fact that two researchers interviewed the participants could be argued as either an advantage or a disadvantage. The participants could potentially feel uncomfortable if a power imbalance is perceived when meeting two interviewers, and the opportunity for rich data collection could be lost [48]. On the other hand, a second interviewer may facilitate a better exploration of the understanding and meaning behind the narratives [48]. The researchers who analyzed and discussed the data were from different academic backgrounds, and this researcher triangulation may have resulted in a broader understanding of the participants’ reflections.

One threat to the trustworthiness of the study is if the participants perceived that the interviewers, who represented the hospital that initiated the study in review, expected a favorable evaluation from them. In such a situation, the participants may sugarcoat their experiences and not fully describe their reality [49]. However, we mitigated this factor through several strategies. First, none of the interviewers knew the participants, and the participants were reminded of the confidentiality and anonymity procedures. Second, the interviews were performed outside earshot of others to help put the participants at ease [49]. Finally, the participants were encouraged to report any negative experiences to help assess whether the follow-up model was beneficial for future survivors. The pilot was conducted at a single practice site in Norway. Thus, transferability of this study to other populations may be limited and should be considered when planning studies in different settings.

Conclusions

The results showed that the survivors of gynecological cancer from the LETSGO pilot felt safe and were generally satisfied with the nurse-led consultations reinforced with eHealth technology. The participants felt the nurse-led consultations and symptom registration in the app were reassuring, and they expressed an increased awareness of symptom monitoring and the benefits of physical activity. However, the objective of nurse-led care and active eHealth technology provided to empower patients and encourage self-management in the survivorship trajectory could have been more strongly emphasized. The LETSGO app was used regularly during the trial, but unexpected software issues and perceived app limitations led to reduced use among some. Participants who felt well also indicated that a survivorship app was unnecessary. Thus, a reasonable next step would be to conduct additional research using prospective intervention studies with eHealth technology and alternating care between nurses and physicians. The current study demonstrates the importance of thorough testing of new electronic applications to prevent technical challenges and inferior treatment when the app loses function.

Practical Implications

Follow-up care with eHealth technology and nurse-led consultations is a promising approach for survivors of gynecological cancer and should be tested in a larger study that compares such care with the traditional follow-up program. The present study includes patient perspectives on the implementation of nurse-led consultations and eHealth technology in a follow-up setting. The opinions, suggestions, and needs of the participants in the current study should be considered when planning larger intervention studies on personalized care to help prevent patient dissatisfaction and reduce dropout rates.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the study findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

eHealth technology:

Electronic technology used in the health care system

FIGO:

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

LETSGO:

Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynecologic Oncology

References

  1. Sekse R, Dunberger G, Olesen M, Østerbye M, Seibæk L. Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer—an integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28:1393–421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. He W, Goodkind D, Kowal P. An Aging World: 2015. In: Bureau USC, editor. International Population Reports, P95/16–1. U.S. Washington, DC, USA: Government Publishing Office; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foster C, Calman L, Richardson A, Pimperton H, Nash R. Improving the lives of people living with and beyond cancer: Generating the evidence needed to inform policy and practice. J Cancer Policy. 2018;15:92–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alfano CM, Mayer DK, Bhatia S, Maher J, Scott JM, Nekhlyudov L, et al. Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow-up care in the United States: Proceedings from an American Cancer Society American Society of Clinical Oncology summit. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(3):234–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Boland L, Bennett K, Connolly D. Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(5):1585–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eskildsen N, Joergensen C, Thomsen T, Ross L, Dietz S, Groenvold M, et al. Patient empowerment: a systematic review of questionnaires measuring empowerment in cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):156–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, Schulman-Green D, Schilling LS, Lorig K, et al. Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(1):50–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs LA, Shulman LN. Follow-up care of cancer survivors: challenges and solutions. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e19–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies NJ, Batehup L. Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(2):142–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smits A, Lopes A, Das N, Bekkers R, Massuger L, Galaal K. The effect of lifestyle interventions on the quality of life of gynaecological cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139(3):546–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedenreich CM, Cook LS, Wang Q, Kokts-Porietis RL, McNeil J, Ryder-Burbidge C, et al. Prospective Cohort Study of Pre- and Postdiagnosis Physical Activity and Endometrial Cancer Survival. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(34):4107–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Moorman PG, Jones LW, Akushevich L, Schildkraut JM. Recreational Physical Activity and Ovarian Cancer Risk and Survival. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21(3):178–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):243–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleisher L, Wen KY, Miller SM, Diefenbach M, Stanton AL, Ropka M, et al. Development and utilization of complementary communication channels for treatment decision making and survivorship issues among cancer patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience. Internet Interv. 2015;2(4):392–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jakimowicz S, Stirling C, Duddle M. An investigation of factors that impact patients’ subjective experience of nurse-led clinics: a qualitative systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(1–2):19–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smits A, Lopes A, Das N, Bekkers R, Kent E, McCullough Z, et al. Nurse-Led Telephone Follow-up: Improving Options for Women With Endometrial Cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(3):232–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Monterosso L, Platt V, Bulsara M, Berg M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient reported outcomes for nurse-led models of survivorship care for adult cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;73:62–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanceley A, Berzuini C, Burnell M, Gessler S, Morris S, Ryan A, et al. Ovarian Cancer Follow-up: a preliminary comparison of 2 Approaches. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(1):59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Suh S-R, Lee M. Effects of nurse-led telephone-based supportive interventions for patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017;44(4):E168–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Huang J, Zhang J, Li Y. A home-based, nurse-led health program for postoperative patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;21:174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakker R, Mens J, de Groot H, Tuijnman-Raasveld C, Braat C, Hompus W, et al. A nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention after radiotherapy for gynecological cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):729–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Q, Li F, Zhang H, Yu X, Cong Y. Effects of nurse-led home-based exercise & cognitive behavioral therapy on reducing cancer-related fatigue in patients with ovarian cancer during and after chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;78:52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beaver K, Williamson S, Sutton C, Hollingworth W, Gardner A, Allton B, et al. Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up for patients treated for stage-I endometrial cancer (ENDCAT trial): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2017;124(1):150–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shekelle P, Morton S, Keeler E. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evid Rep Technol Access. 2006;132:1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Penedo FJ, Oswald LB, Kronenfeld JP, Garcia SF, Cella D, Yanez B. The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(5):e240–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuijpers W, Groen W, Aaronson N, van Harten W. A systematic review of web-based interventions for patient empowerment and physical activity in chronic diseases: relevance for cancer survivors. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gee P, Greenwood D, Miller L. The eHealth enhanced chronic care model: a theory derivation approach. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandborg J, Henriksson P, Larsen E, Lindqvist A-K, Rutberg S, Söderström E, et al. Participants’ Engagement and Satisfaction With a Smartphone App Intended to Support Healthy Weight Gain, Diet, and Physical Activity During Pregnancy: Qualitative Study Within the HealthyMoms Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(3):e26159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Vistad I, Skorstad M, Demmelmaier I, Småstuen MC, Lindemann K, Wisløff T, et al. Lifestyle and Empowerment Techniques in Survivorship of Gynaecologic Oncology (LETSGO study): a study protocol for a multicentre longitudinal interventional study using mobile health technology and biobanking. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e050930.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong T, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18(2):145–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindseth A, Norberg A. Elucidating the meaning of life world phenomena. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2022;36(3):883–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brinkmann SSK. Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cox A, Faithfull S. Aiding a reassertion of self: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of women with ovarian cancer receiving long-term nurse-led telephone follow-up. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(8):2357–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Taylor K, Monterosso L, Bulsara C. Qualitative results from a phase II pilot randomised controlled trial of a lymphoma nurse-led model of survivorship care. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;35:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnsen AT, Eskildsen NB, Thomsen TG, Grønvold M, Ross L, Jørgensen CR. Conceptualizing patient empowerment in cancer follow-up by combining theory and qualitative data. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):232–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Groen W, Kuijpers W, Oldenburg H, Wouters M, Aaronson N, van Harten W. Empowerment of Cancer Survivors Through Information Technology: An Integrative Review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):e270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. de Rooij B, Ezendam N, Vos M, Pijnenborg J, Boll D, Kruitwagen R, et al. Patients’ information coping styles influence the benefit of a survivorship care plan in the ROGY Care Trial: New insights for tailored delivery. Cancer. 2019;125(5):788–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Feldman SS, Buchalter S, Hayes LW. Health Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2018;6(2):e10264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mancebo G, Solé-Sedeño JM, Membrive I, Taus A, Castells M, Serrano L, et al. Gynecologic cancer surveillance in the era of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) [published ahead of print Oct 5, 2020]. Int J Gynecol Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020–001942.

  41. Denis F, Yossi S, Septans AL, Charron A, Voog E, Dupuis O, et al. Improving Survival in Patients Treated for a Lung Cancer Using Self-Evaluated Symptoms Reported Through a Web Application. Am J Clin Oncol. 2017;40(5):464–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, et al. Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):557–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors determining the success and failure of ehealth interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e10235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Alwashmi MF, Fitzpatrick B, Davis E, John-Michael G, Farrell J, Hawboldt J. Perceptions of Health Care Providers Regarding a Mobile Health Intervention to Manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7(6):e13950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Foster C, Grimmett C, May CM, Ewings S, Myall M, Hulme C, et al. A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(6):2445–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Aunan ST, Wallgren GC, Sætre HB. Breast cancer survivors’ experiences of dealing with information during and after adjuvant treatment: A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(15–16):3012–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Faller H, Brähler E, Härter M, Keller M, Schulz H, Wegscheider K, et al. Unmet needs for information and psychosocial support in relation to quality of life and emotional distress: a comparison between gynecological and breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(10):1934–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Matteson S, Lincoln Y. Using multiple interviewers in qualitative research studies: The influence of ethic of care behaviors in research interview settings. Qual Inq. 2009;15(4):659–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bergen N, Labonté R. “Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems”: Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):783–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Bergen. The Uni Foundation and the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority funded this study. The funding bodies had no role in the study design or in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sorlandet Hospital HF, Egsveien 100, 4615, Kristiansand, Norway

    Mette Skorstad & Ingvild Vistad

  2. Clinical Institute II, Medical Department, University of Bergen, Haukelandsveien 28, 5009, Bergen, Norway

    Mette Skorstad & Ingvild Vistad

  3. Department of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, 4630, Kristiansand, Norway

    Liv Fegran & Berit Johannessen

  4. Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, 4630, Kristiansand, Norway

    Sveinung Berntsen

Authors
  1. Mette Skorstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingvild Vistad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liv Fegran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sveinung Berntsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Berit Johannessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. MS and BJ prepared materials, conducted interviews, and collected and analyzed data. MS wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all the authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mette Skorstad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics of South East Norway (2017/2195) approved the study, which was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants consented in writing to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

All participants consented to the publication of data from the interviews.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

12912_2022_1104_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Additional file 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skorstad, M., Vistad, I., Fegran, L. et al. Nurse-led consultations reinforced with eHealth technology: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients with gynecological cancer. BMC Nurs 21, 326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01104-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01104-9

Keywords

  • Nurse-led consultations
  • Follow-up care
  • Survivors of gynecological cancer
  • eHealth technology, Self-management
  • Empowerment

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us