Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors related to a successful professional development for specialist nurses in surgical care: a cross-sectional study

BMC Nursing volume 22, Article number: 79 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A high level of competence among staff is necessary for providing patient-safe surgical care. Knowledge regarding what factors contribute to the professional development of specialist nurses in surgical care and why they choose to remain in the workplace despite high work requirements is needed. To investigate and describe the organizational and social work environment of specialist nurses in surgical care as part of studying factors that impact on professional development.

Method

This was a cross-sectional study with a strategic convenience sampling procedure that recruited 73 specialist nurses in surgical care in Sweden between October to December 2021. The study was guided by STROBE Statement and checklist of cross-sectional studies. The validated Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire was used, and additional demographic data. Descriptive statistics were performed and the comparison to the population benchmarks was presented as the mean with a 95% confidence interval. To study potential differences among the demographic and professional characteristics, pairwise t tests were used with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons with a significance level of 5%.

Results

Five domains were identified as factors related to success, as they received higher scores in relation to population benchmarks: quality of leadership, variation of work, meaning of work and work engagement as well as job insecurity. There was also a significant association between a having a manager with low nursing education and job insecurity (p = 0.021).

Conclusions

Quality of leadership is important for the professional development of specialist nurses in surgical care. Strategic work seems to include managers with a higher nursing education level to prevent insecure professional working conditions.

Peer Review reports

Background

Today, many surgical clinics internationally are struggling with cost savings and nursing shortages, which is a major challenge for nursing management. In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a synthesis of contemporary evidence based on the important responsibilities of nurses and nurse management [1]. A high level of competence and well-educated nurses is necessary for providing patient-safe care [2]. It has been reported that there is a shortage of specialist nurses globally [1, 2]. Reversing this negative trend requires changes that create good conditions for high-quality surgical nursing and the opportunity for job satisfaction and professional development [3]. Therefore, more knowledge is needed about what factors contribute to the professional development of specialist nurses in surgical care and why they chose to remain in the workplace despite high work requirements.

Specialist nurses in surgical care have the competence to bridge the gap between nursing surgical research and implementation into clinical practice. In-depth competence leads to the needs of surgical patients being correctly addressed due to the provision of high-quality care and entails increased patient safety. Unfortunately, high employee turnover in the surgical context has had a negative impact on these aspects. At the same time, there has been considerable focus on why nurses and specialist nurses choose to leave employment. It appears to be generally accepted that the main reason is high workload combined with low salary. This is in line with previous findings, showing that a low salary and a lower degree of autonomy were strong predictors of specialist nurses leaving their jobs within a five-year period [4]. However, it has also been suggested that low job satisfaction is a reason for leaving employment [5, 6]. Perceived job satisfaction due to e.g., respect from colleagues and a possibility of continuous learning, is reasons to stay and used nursing professional skills to the fullest [7].

There are several underlying factors related to a nurse’s sense of job satisfaction and motivation, which can be divided into external and internal rewards. External rewards, such as salary, relationships with colleagues and opportunities for professional development, can be a driving force in nurses' work [4, 8]. Using one's skills and being independent in work as a nurse has also been shown to contribute to a sense of job satisfaction, which are examples of internal rewards [5, 9,10,11].

Previous studies have shown that there is a multifactorial impact on job satisfaction and professional development. Job satisfaction as a type of affective reaction to work that includes values, expectations and needs to thrive [12]. Furthermore, the motivation to work affects one's actions, what choices one makes and the degree of effort. It affects the acquisition of skills, professional development and how competence is utilized [13, 14].

One way to achieve professional development is by adapting goal-driven management, which means that the leadership and the organization actively work to achieve goals, such as quality indicators and feedback of quality in set goals. This may increase efficiency since professionals can influence their work situations and development and have their own responsibility to improve their working environment [14, 15]. Another successful model in the nursing context is the Magnet model, which originates from the United States. The Swedish Nurses' Association describes that in Magnet model management, nurses need to be included in mandates (Chief Nurse Officers) and participate in making decisions that affect the organization's visions, goals, and priorities [16]. To demonstrate a measurable outcome of developed nursing leadership, nurses must perceive that their efforts are valuable and that they are supported in their work. Magnet hospitals are characterized by, among other aspects, a high level of competence [17, 18].

Determining optimal staffing requirements is a complex issue. Currently, several workforce planning and modelling tools exist, which investigate matching patient needs and service requirements with required nursing numbers and competencies [19]. The theoretical Job Demands-Resources Theory (JD-R) describe the relationship between job demands and job resources, in line with mission-relevant staffing levels and the Magnet Model [18, 20]. Job demands are physical, social or organizational aspects of work that require constant physical or mental efforts on the part of the worker. Specialized nurses in surgical care are often involved in many technical tasks, including independent decision-making, administrative work and providing care for a large number of patients with serious medical conditions. Job resources, on the other hand, involve physical, psychological, social or organizational aspects of the work that can work in part to achieve work-related goals and to stimulate professional development. An imbalance between work requirements and work resources can, in accordance with the JD-R model, have organizational consequences, as this can lead to exhaustion, reduced motivation and the risk of nurses choosing to leave the workplace and, in the worst case, the profession [21, 22].

A shortage of nurses leads to a deterioration in the quality of care and loss of care, which in turn has an impact on patient safety [23,24,25,26]. It may be problematic to further develop surgical nursing over time without competence, and patients are often the ones who suffer. Reversing a negative trend requires changes that create opportunities for professional development and, consequently, good conditions for high-quality surgical nursing. A high level of competence among nurses is necessary for providing patient-safe surgical care. Therefore, more knowledge is needed about what factors contribute to the professional development of specialist nurses in surgical care and why they choose to remain in the workplace despite high work requirements.

The aim of this study was to investigate and describe the organizational and social work environment of specialist nurses in surgical care as part of studying the factors that impact on professional development. Research questions: What factors are related to success and less success in relation to the Swedish population benchmarks? Are there significant differences between factors and demographic variables?

Methods

Design

This was a cross-sectional study, guided by STROBE Statement and checklist of cross-sectional studies [27].

Data collection

With a strategic convenience sampling procedure, specialist nurses in surgical care were recruited to the study between October to December 2021. The study was performed in Sweden and recruited specialist nurses in Swedish surgical care (in different public hospitals). The oral and written information about the study and reminders were disseminated via the National Association of Nurses in Surgical Care (NFSK) webpage and social media with a link to the questionnaire. The total members at this point in time (October 2021) were 191 specialist nurses and 5 nurse practitioners in surgical care. However, it is not known what percentage of NFSK members are active in social media, so the response rate was difficult to calculate. Since the study population was a convenience sample, a post hoc power analysis was performed, and the study was adequately powered (see Data analysis).

Measurement

The validated Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire 3 (COPSOQ) was used in the study [28]. The research team distributed the COPSOQ as an anonymous digital web-based questionnaire. No changes were made to the questionnaire's items when they were transferred to a web-based questionnaire. In the survey, questions about demographic variables were asked in addition to the COPSOQ items and included the variables of sex, age, marital status, and education level. Additionally, questions were asked about professional experience as a registered nurse and specialist training, the number of jobs in which they had worked as a nurse and the number of years at the current workplace. The COPSOQ is a generic, theoretically based instrument that measures different aspects of the organizational and social work environment. The instrument was developed in Denmark in the early 2000s. Since then, the instrument has been updated and translated into more than 25 languages, including Swedish [28]. The latest version, version three, contains the following seven sections: requirements at work, the organization and content of the work, relationships and leadership, interactions between the individual and their work, social capital, health and well-being and abusive behaviour [29]. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was above 0.70 for all scales, except for the two-item scale for Quality in Work (0.69). Most dimensions had low floor and ceiling effects [28].

COPSOQ items have 5 response options on Likert-type scales, e.g., from a very low to a very high extent or never to always. All versions have undergone extensive psychometric testing, and the previous version, version 2, was also tested through an operationalization of the JD-R model [30]. The included areas from the COPSOQ 3 were compared to population benchmarks. One of the findings of that study was that a management style that promotes possibilities for professional development, provides the ability to influence the work situation and provides clarity regarding work expectations is particularly relevant for achieving job satisfaction and work engagement [30].

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics (proportions and counts) were performed to present the study population demographics and professional characteristics. The comparison to the population benchmarks was presented as the mean with a 95% confidence interval. Confidence intervals that did not include their respective benchmarks were considered significantly different from the benchmark.

Since the study population was a convenience sample, a post hoc power analysis was performed in GPower 3.1, were most of the items had a power > 0.80 [31]. To study potential differences among the demographic and professional characteristics, pairwise t tests were used with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons with a significance level of 5%. IBM SPSS Statistics 27 was used for data processing and statistical calculation.

Results

A total of 73 participants answered the COPSOQ 3, and 67 participants provided demographic data. All 73 questionnaires were included in the analysis, but internal data were missing for some variables. All 73 completed questionnaires with few internal missing data were consider, and we did not exclude any participants. Table 1 presents the specialist nurses’ surgical care demographics (internal missing data are not shown for the specific variables).

Table 1 Demographics (n = 67)
Full size table

The included professionals’ characteristics are shown in Table 2. The majority had a one-year master’s degree as well as many years of clinical experience as a registered nurse (> 10 years). Most participants (83.6%) had only one workplace as a specialist nurse in surgical care, and half of the participants had a manager with further education at an advanced level or specialist training in nursing.

Table 2 Professional characteristics (n = 73)
Full size table

The following four areas in the COPSOQ were identified as factors related to success: quality of leadership, variation of work, meaning of work and work engagement, which were rated with higher mean scores compared to population benchmarks. In addition, job insecurity was indicated by a much lower mean score, which was desirable for this specific question.

Although the study aimed to investigate factors related to success and less success in relation to the Swedish population benchmarks, nine domains were identified as factors related to less success in the analysis (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Successful and unsuccessful factors in relation to the Swedish population benchmarks

Full size image

The mean scale scores in relation to the population benchmarks for workers in Sweden are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Mean scale scores in relation to the population benchmarks for workers in Sweden
Full size table

To answer the research question of significant differences between the demographic variables and factors, pairwise t tests were used. The results also showed significant differences between the participants who had and those who did not have a manager with specialist training in nursing; the latter group, to a greater extent, perceived job insecurity (p = 0.036) and insecurity over their working conditions (p = 0.021). P values are not shown for items that were tested and did not show significant differences at a 5% significance level.

The results showed that role clarity significantly differed between nurses aged 35 to 45 years and specialist nurses in surgical care who were older than 45 years (p = 0.019), and there was also an observed difference (not statically significant) between nurses who were younger than 35 years and nurses who were older than 45 years. This can be interpreted as an older age leading to a clearer professional role.

Higher scores were also found for variation of work (p = 0.039), role clarity (p = 0.016) and sense of community at work (p = 0.012) between specialist nurses in surgical care who had colleagues with specialist education and those who did not.

Differences between RNs who had worked in a single and three or more workplaces were found. RNs who had worked in three or more workplaces provided lower scores for possibilities for development (p = 0.016), recognition (p = 0.037), social support from colleagues (p = 0.013), and organizational justice (p = 0.040).

Furthermore, RNs who had worked in two workplaces provided higher scores for possibilities for development (p = 0.046) and quality of leadership (p = 0.30) than those who had worked in three or more workplaces, and lower scores for self-rated health than those who had worked in a single workplace (p = 0.020).

Finally, a higher score on organizational justice (p = 0.043) was found for RNs who had worked in a single workplace as a specialized nurse in surgical care compared to those who had worked in three or more workplaces.

Discussion

This study provides valuable knowledge on specialist nurses in surgical care and their perspectives of organizational and social work environments in the surgical care context. The main results show that quality of leadership is important for the professional development of specialist nurses in surgical care. The five domains that were identified as being related to success compared to the population benchmarks were quality of leadership, variation of work, meaning of work and work engagement as well as low job insecurity. There was a correlation between nurse managers with a lower level of nursing education and uncertainty about working conditions. Previous studies have shown the importance of excellent leadership and a nurse's level of education [32, 33]. It has been suggested that high-quality leadership may reduce nurses’ job stress and intentions of leaving the field. Transformational and transactional leadership styles may reduce nurses’ job stress and intentions to leave the field, so nurse leaders can use a combination of transformational and transactional leadership to improve job satisfaction and the quality of nursing services. This means that nurse leaders can have an impact on improving job satisfaction, the quality of nursing and nurses’ education levels, which may impact patient mortality in surgical care [32, 33]. However, it is also important that nurses also take responsibility for their own situations and create good relationships with management.

Based on the results in the study, we interpret that improvement seems to include higher levels of nursing education for managers, which in turn may reduce the perception of insecure working conditions for specialist nurses in surgical care. To demonstrate a measurable outcome of developed nursing leadership, specialist nurses in surgical care must perceive that their efforts during and after graduation are valuable and that they are supported in their work. Magnet hospitals are characterized by a high level of competence in nursing leadership [17, 18], and nurse managers need to facilitate and enhance nurses’ use of evidence-based practices. Both managers and nurses need to have the necessary academic preparation, support and resources required for practices using evidence-based nursing.

It is a worrisome development that some hospitals and departments do not have nurse managers with nursing expertise and a bachelor’s degree. This can have both short- and long-term consequences for the quality of care, and strategic work is usually absent when nursing leaders have low education levels. Given these circumstances, it is hardly surprising that specialist nurses may lack the right conditions and support to provide high-quality surgical care.

High-quality leadership in nursing is necessary to obtain long-term profits to improve both the quality and efficiency of hospital care [34,35,36]. The lack of nurses with a higher education leads to a deterioration in the quality of care and missed nursing care, which may have serious consequences for patient safety [23,24,25,26]. Educating specialist nurses and then failing to provide the right conditions for them to provide high-quality surgical care due to a lack of competent leadership is a waste of resources, both from a health economic and a patient safety perspective.

Our results showed that specialist nurses in surgical care who had worked in three or more workplaces provided lower scores for possibilities for development, recognition and organizational justice. A higher score for organizational justice was found for those who had worked in a single workplace as a specialized nurse in surgical care compared to those who had worked in three or more workplaces. The imbalance between work requirements and work resources can, in accordance with the JD-R model, have organizational consequences, as this can lead to reduced motivation and professional development with the risk of specialist nurses in surgical care choosing to leave the workplace and/or profession [21, 22].

Strategic work seems to include managers with a higher nursing education level to prevent insecure professional working conditions. Health care organizations, including surgical clinics, often find it difficult to overcome the lack of competence in nursing, and there is a focus on "putting out fires" instead of long-term strategic work. This damage control does not provide opportunities for delivering the best evidence-based care, and the recruitment of new nurses is a costly and time-consuming procedure. Reversing a negative trend requires changes that create good conditions for high-quality surgical nursing and provide the opportunity for professional development.

The present study has strengths and limitations. A strength of this study is that the validated COPSOQ was used. The COPSOQ is a generic and theoretically based questionnaire that measures different aspects of the organizational and social work environment. The questionnaire has undergone psychometric testing and has been tested through an operationalization of the JD-R model [29]. The data in this study were compared to population benchmarks, which is also interpreted as a strength.

Limitations

Limitations of the study are recognized. Firstly, the cross-sectional data and a strategic convenience sampling procedure may be interpreted as a limitation on the generalizability of the study. Secondly, the sample size may have affected the results. Due to the fact that this study was based on a convenience sample of 73 specialist nurses in surgical care and the data collection procedure. However, it is not exactly known what percentage of NFSK members are active in social media, so the response rate was difficult to exactly calculate for the research team. Since the study population was a convenience sample, a post hoc power analysis was performed, and the study was adequately powered. We aimed for a power > 0.80, and the most items were > 0.80. However, the study was conducted with specialist nurses in surgical care in a variety of hospitals in Sweden. The lack of specialist nurses leads to a deterioration in the quality of care and missed nursing care, which may have serious consequences for patient safety [23,24,25,26].

Conclusions

Our results showed that specialist nurses in surgical care who had worked in a single workplace provided a higher score for organizational justice compared to those who had worked in three or more workplaces. The imbalance between work requirements and work resources may have organizational consequences, as this can lead to reduced motivation and professional development with a risk that specialist nurses in surgical care choose to leave the workplace and/or the profession. There was a correlation between nurse managers with a lower level of nursing education and uncertainty about working conditions, and the quality of leadership is important for professional development in specialist nurses in surgical care. The research implications are a strategic work for policy to recruit managers with a higher nursing education level to prevent insecure professional working conditions.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the confidentiality agreement with the participants. The data is however available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. WHO. State of the world’s nursing 2020: Investing in education, jobs and leadership. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279.

  2. Coster S, Watkins M, Norman IJ. What is the impact of professional nursing on patients’ outcomes globally? An overview of research evidence. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;78:76–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu H, Zhao Y, While A. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:21–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagan J, Curtis DL. Predictors of nurse practitioner retention. J Am Ass of Nurse Pract. 2018;30(5):280–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Athey EK, Leslie MS, Briggs LA, Park J, Falk NL, Pericak A, El-Banna MM, Greene J. How important are autonomy and work setting to nurse practitioners’ job satisfaction? J Am Ass of Nurse Pract. 2016;28:320–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wålinder R, Runeson-Broberg R, Arakelian E, Nordqvist T, Runeson A, Rask-Andersen A. A supportive climate and low strain promote well-being and sustainable working life in the operation theatre. Up J Med Sci. 2018;123(3):183–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahlstedt C, Lindvall CE, Holmström IK, Athlin ÅM. What makes registered nurses remain in work? An ethnographic study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;89:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gittell JH, Logan C, Cronenwett J, Foster TC, Freeman R, Godfrey M, Vidal DC. Impact of relational coordination on staff and patient outcomes in outpatient surgical clinics. Health Care Manage Rev. 2020;45(1):12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. André B, Sjøvold E, Rannestad T, Ringdal GI. The impact of work culture on quality of care in nursing homes-a review study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28:449–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Broetje S, Jenny GJ, Bauer GF. The key job demands and resources of nursing staff: An integrative review of reviews. Front in Psych. 2020;11:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goedhart NS, Van Oostveen CJ, Vermeulen H. The effect of structural empowerment of nurses on quality outcomes in hospitals: A scoping review. J Nurs Manage. 2017;25(3):194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss HM. Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Hum Res Manage Rev. 2002;12(2):173–94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Locke EA, Latham GP. New directions in goal-setting theory. Currt Dir Psych Sci. 2006;15(5):265–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieminen AL, Mannevaara B, Fagerström L. Advanced practice nurses’ scope of practice: A qualitative study of advanced clinical competencies. Scand J Car Sci. 2011;25:661–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee S. A concept analysis of “Meaning in work” and its implications for nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71:2258–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swedish Nurses' Association. Ledarskap för omvårdnad och magnetmodellen. 2018. Retrieved from https://www.swenurse.se/download/18.1dbf1316170bff6748cd989/1584346364058/Ledarskap%20f%C3%B6r%20omv%C3%A5rdnad%20och%20magnetmodellen%20reviderad%202018.pdf.

  17. Meier A, Erickson JI, Snow N, Kline M. Nurse and patient satisfaction. J Nurs Admin. 2019;49(11):520–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Upenieks V. Recruitment and retention strategies: A Magnet hospital prevention model. Medsurg Nursing. 2005; Suppl, 21–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. International Council of Nurses. Evidence-based safe nurse staffing. 2009. Retrieved from https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/ICN%20PS%20Evidence%20based%20safe%20nurse%20staffing_0.pdf.

  20. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. J Occ Health Psych. 2017;22:273–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elbejjani M, Abed Al Ahad M, Simon M, Ausserhofer D, Dumit N, Abu-Saad Huijer H, Dhaini SR. Work environment-related factors and nurses’ health outcomes: A cross-sectional study in Lebanese hospitals. BMC Nurs. 2020;19:95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zaghini F, Biagioli V, Proietti M, Badolamenti S, Fiorini J, Sili A. The role of occupational stress in the association between emotional labor and burnout in nurses: A cross-sectional study. App Nurs Res. 2020;54:151277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jangland E, Teodorsson T, Molander K, Athlin ÅM. Inadequate environment, resources and values lead to missed nursing care: A focused ethnographic study on the surgical ward using the Fundamentals of Care framework. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27:2311–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lunden A, Teräs M, Kvist T, Häggman-Laitila A. A systematic review of factors influencing knowledge management and the nurse leaders’ role. J Nurs Manage. 2017;25:407–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McHugh MD, Kelly LA, Smith HL, Wu ES, Vanak JM, Aiken LH. Lower mortality in magnet hospitals. Med Care. 2013;51:382–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ritter D. The relationship between healthy work environments and retention of nurses in a hospital setting. J Nurs Manage. 2011;19(1):27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berthelsen H, Westerlund H, Bergström G, Burr H. Validation of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire version III and establishment of benchmarks for psychosocial risk management in Sweden. Int J Envir Res Public Health. 2020;17:3179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire). Sweden. http://www.copsoq.se. Accessed 14 July 2022.

  30. Berthelsen H, Hakanen JJ, Westerlund H. Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire - a validation study using the job demand-resources model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0196450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pishgooie AH, Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F, Falcó-Pegueroles A, Lotfi Z. Correlation between nursing managers’ leadership styles and nurses’ job stress and anticipated turnover. J Nurs Manage. 2019;27:527–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Porat-Dahlerbruch J, Aiken LH, Lasater KB, Sloane DM, McHugh MD. Variations in nursing baccalaureate education and 30-day inpatient surgical mortality. Nurs Outlook. 2022;70:300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cummings GG, MacGregor T, Davey M, Lee H, Wong CA, Lo E, Muise M, Stafford E. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(3):363–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Needleman J. The economic case for fundamental nursing care. Nurs Leadership. 2016;29(1):26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Needleman J, Hassmiller S. The role of nurses in improving hospital quality and efficiency: Real-world results. Health Aff. 2009;28:w625–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the specialist nurses in surgical care who took the time to answer the survey and to the NFSK.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Linköping University. The study received funding from The Swedish Society of Nursing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nursing Science, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Jenny Drott

  2. Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden

    Jenny Drott

  3. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    My Engström

  4. Department of Surgery Sahlgrenska, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

    My Engström

  5. Department of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Eva Jangland

  6. Unit for Public Health and Statistics, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Victoria Fomichov

  7. Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Marlene Malmström

  8. Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

    Marlene Malmström

  9. Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

    Jenny Jakobsson

Authors
  1. Jenny Drott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. My Engström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eva Jangland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Victoria Fomichov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marlene Malmström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jenny Jakobsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JD, ME, EJ, VF, MM, JJ: Conceptualization, Methodology, JD, JJ: Data collection, VF: Data analysis JD: Writing- Original draft preparation, JD, ME, EJ, VF, MM, JJ: Writing- Reviewing and Editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Drott.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In the information letter the aim and process of the study were described. The written informed consent was obtained from the participants through the participation form. It included the principles for voluntary participation, confidentiality assurance and included contact information to the researchers. There was no financial compensation. The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Swedish Ethical Review Authority and thus also the Swedish law of research ethics, which emanates from the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. The study received ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2020–06927).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drott, J., Engström, M., Jangland, E. et al. Factors related to a successful professional development for specialist nurses in surgical care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 22, 79 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01258-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01258-0

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us