Skip to main content
Download PDF

Home care practice behavior and its influencing factors of primary care providers: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Sichuan Province, China

BMC Nursing volume 23, Article number: 303 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Primary care providers play an important role in home health care, and their practice behavior is significant for care quality and patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the home care practice behavior of Chinese primary care providers and to explore the factors associated with the practice behavior.

Methods

A multicenter cross-sectional design with a convenience sample was used to survey 863 registered primary care providers from 62 primary health care settings in Sichuan Province, China. Descriptive statistics, t-test or ANOVA for one-way analysis, and Pearson’s correlation analyses were used to compare the differences and examine the relationships between participants’ demographics and experience of home care services and practice behavior. Multiple linear regression models were performed to identify salient variables associated with the practice behavior from among demographic and home care experience.

Results

The score of home care practice behavior questionnaire was 97.25 ± 21.05. The average scores for the dimensions of home visit preparation, assessment, medical care behavior and safety practice were 3.70 ± 0.95, 3.76 ± 1.02, 3.66 ± 1.03, and 3.20 ± 0.46, respectively. Home care practice behavior was associated with working years, working experience in general hospitals, work area, home care experience such as client types of home care, service frequency and willingness, explaining 21.5% of the total variance.

Conclusion

Chinese primary care providers had a medium to high level of home care practice behavior but poor implementation of safety practice. The results may provide clues to increased focus and implementation of safety practice, as well as providing targeted measures based on influencing factors.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Populations around the world are rapidly aging because of falling fertility rates and increasing life expectancy [1]. According to the WHO, one in six people worldwide will be aged ≥ 60 years in 2030 [2]. Consistent with global trends, the National Bureau of Statistics of China reported that the proportion of people aged 60 and over was 18.70% in 2020, which is increasing year by year [3]. The one-child policy implemented over the years and economic pressures have led to increasing burdens on young people and decreasing the caregiving capacity of families [4, 5]. Meanwhile, home-based older adults often face a constellation of daily challenges, including multiple chronic conditions, functional impairment, frailty, and social and mental stressors [6], leading to increasing demand for healthcare in China [7,8,9]. Over the past two decades, there has been a gradual extension of health-care services from hospitals to the community and the home [10]. This shift has also been driven by the objectives of shortening the length of hospital stay, relieving medical resource constraints and holding the belief of ageing in place [11, 12].

Home care, which is also called home-based services, is a cost-effective approach for the treatment of stable medical conditions and the management of chronic conditions [13]. It provides individualized care to patients of any age and families in their living environment by health professionals, which encompasses a range of activities, from preventive health work to palliative care [14]. Home care can decrease care costs while simultaneously improving quality [15], reducing emergency department visits and avoidable hospitalizations [16], improving advance care planning [17], relieving pressure on hospital care and reducing the risk of cross-infection [18]. On the other hand, compared with hospital work, home care is still fraught with uncertainty due to factors such as service environment, service population and operational risks. Especially as shorter hospital stays result in more patients being discharged from the hospital more quickly, providing home care while they are still uncomfortable is becoming increasingly complex [19].

It is noteworthy that the results of existing reports on home care were not ideal. A Canadian study found an incidence rate of 13.2% for adverse events in home care, of which one-third were considered preventable [20]. A national study in Japan reported that only 26.5% of facilities did not report adverse events in home-care settings [21]. Other countries had also mentioned the frequent occurrence of inadequate home care [22, 23]. The quality and safety of home health care need to be emphasized.

In China, home care has a late start but requires a high level of service competence from medical staff. First, there are clear requirements on the years of professional experience of medical staff, including more than three years of work experience for doctors, five years for nurses and three years for rehabilitation therapists [24]. In addition to basic medical operation skills and professional knowledge, they also need to be good at identifying and solving problems, communication and collaboration, and risk prevention. Not only do they share these common characteristics, different healthcare professionals also have their own specialties and characteristics. For example, doctors can prescribe medication, nurses can perform wound dressing changes and care, and rehabilitators can provide rehabilitation. However, they are both client-centered and have the goal of solving problems for their clients.

Apart from the personnel requirement, home care is also improving and developing in various aspects, including the way clients access the services, who provides them, and how they are provided. At present, clients access services primarily through basic medical insurance and long-term care insurance to support this, although the insurance has conditions for payment and can only partially cover the costs [25]. Home care fully meets the client-centeredness. According to the client’s wishes and specific service needs, the hospital staff will confirm the service information with the client in advance and then select the corresponding professionals and instrumental materials to bring the client a good treatment experience. Most of the time, home care providers are mainly nurses, followed by doctors [26]. During the process, medical staff will always follow up with the client and keep track of their health conditions. Although medical staff come from different institutions and backgrounds, they can communicate with each other, and seek help from other specialists in higher-level hospitals if they encounter problems. In particular, Internet + Care as a form of service delivery is emerging, which facilitates home care practice behavior for medical professionals [7, 27].

Home care practice behavior has an important influence on the quality of home care. The core home care practice behavior is the ability to perform clinical nursing care that is based on the medical worker’s ethical thinking and accurate practice skills [28]. The American Nurses Association Scope and Standards of Home Health Nursing Practice reported six professional practice standards and ten professional performance standards to articulate essential practice behavior [29]. A study subsequently further describes the implementation of the ANA standards in the home setting, giving examples of specific practice behavior competencies [30]. Another literature reported 10 competencies needed for home health care services, with care assessment as the first element [31]. The content of these competencies also informs the standards for practice behavior.

The state is actively promoting the development of home care and gradually regulating practice behavior. In 2020, the National Health Care Commission issued the document “notice on strengthening home medical services for elderly individuals“ [32], which proposed increasing the supply of home care services for the elderly in one step and put forward specific requirements for service institutions and medical workers. Among the specifics are stipulating that primary health care institutions are one of their main providers, adopting practice behaviors of medical staff such as signing agreements with service clients, comprehensively assessing disease, psychological, social support, environmental condition, and safety precaution. To enhance the safety of home care, there are qualification checks before clients can access services, including their proof of identity, case information, and family contracting agreements [32]. In addition, medical staff providing services were needed to attend and pass training organized by the hospital before they can formally provide services [32]. The role of primary health care and primary staff in family disease management is increasingly prominent [33, 34].

Overall, home care services have attracted the attention of a growing number of scholars. But researches mostly focusing on patients’ needs, willingness, or service availability [4, 7, 35,36,37], are lacking in exploring the home care practice behavior of medical professionals in primary care settings. Moreover, there may be variations in what home care service entails across countries and regions due to differences in the organization and structure. The purpose of this study is to describe the current situation of primary care providers’ practice behavior while providing home care services and to explore the factors that influence it to provide a reference for subsequent improvement of practice behavior competence, enhancing service quality and promoting patient outcomes.

Methods

Design

A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted in Sichuan Province, China. Data were collected from August 2021 to June 2022.

Study setting and sample

The study was conducted in primary health care settings in Sichuan, China, with 62 facilities (including community hospitals, community health service centers, township health centers and other primary institutions) in 7 prefectures participating in this study (the service functions of these institutions are all based on basic public health and basic medical services, with the difference being that community health service centers are community-based and family-based, with residents of urban communities as their main service recipients, while township health centers are rural-based, with township residents as their service recipients. Community hospitals, on the other hand, can only be declared for approval when the health centers’ beds, size, outpatient capacity and other requirements have reached a certain standard). The participants were primary care providers who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) had obtained a licence to practice and were officially employed; (2) had worked in a primary health care organization for more than 12 months; (3) had experience with home-based medical services; and (4) voluntary participation. The exclusion criterion was personnel on extended leave or who changed jobs and no longer provided direct medical care and other professional services. A total of 863 medical workers from primary care settings were invited to participate in this survey.

Data collection

The survey was asked to include as many primary care providers as possible using a convenient sampling method. After obtaining the consent of the institution’s managers, a staff member of the institution was hired as a surveyor and trained accordingly on the purpose and requirements of the survey. An electronic questionnaire link was sent to the surveyor, who in turn sent it to the medical staff of the institution. The surveyor explained the purpose and significance of the survey with the medical staff, and after agreement, signed an electronic informed consent form before completing the questionnaire, which had the same instructions for filling out the form and set each IP address to be filled out only once.

Measurements

Self-designed questionnaires were used in the present study.

Demographic information

The survey collected data about basic information of primary care providers such as age, gender, working years, whether they have part-time employment in other organizations, working experience in a general hospital, level of education, professional title, role of medical workers and work area.

Home care experience of primary care providers

The home care experience included the years of providing home care, clients of home care, the frequency of service provided by provides, and the willingness to serve.

Home care practice behavior

The home care practice behavior questionnaire was developed based on insights from previous findings on home health care guidelines and other literature [29, 31, 38,39,40], as well as the content of national documents on the provision of home care services [24, 32]. The content of the scale, which did not involve targeted terminology for different specialties, evaluated the overall practical behavioral situation and process of healthcare professionals in providing home care services. The questionnaire was also applicable to healthcare professionals from different backgrounds. The questionnaire consisted of 27 items and four dimensions: home visit preparation (5 items), assessment (10 items), medical care behavior (6 items) and safety practice (6 items). Every term used five levels of frequency, and the total score of the scale was 27–135 (items 25–27 were reverse scored). Higher scores indicated better execution of home care practice behavior by primary care providers. During development of the questionnaire, a total of seven experts were invited to conduct questionnaire evaluations, including one community nursing educator, one community manager, one home care rehabilitation physician specialist, two home care nursing specialists, and two home care medical specialists. The research team modified the questionnaire to determine the final version based on the recommendations of seven experts. A presurvey of 30 medical workers showed that they could understand the questionnaire content and easily make judgments. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was 0.946, as measured by Cronbach’s alpha. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.96, and the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.71 to 1.00 using an expert panel. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using a sample of 200 cases, which included doctors, nurses, and other medical personnel. The KMO was 0.928, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant (p < 0.01). Four common factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were extracted. Among them, the eigenvalues ranged from 1.261 to 13.270, and the cumulative variance contribution was 72.741%.

Ethical approval

This study and its design received approval from the Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (Approval No. 2020 − 165). Furthermore, the primary care providers were assured that the findings would only be used for research purposes.

Data analysis

We conducted a preliminary check and cleanup of the collected data. Continuous data were expressed as the mean and standard deviation. Categorical data were expressed as percentages. The current status of home care practice behavior was calculated by adding up the scores of all individual measures, using a t-test or ANOVA for one-way analysis, and variables with two-tailed tests with a significance of P < 0.2 were entered into the linear regression equation. Finally, in the linear regression results, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for this test. We used SPSS, version 25.0, to analyse the data.

Results

Demographic characteristics

A descriptive analysis of the general demographic and work-related information of the participants is shown in Table 1. One-third of them were ≤ 30 years old. The majority (92.1%) were women. There were 324 workers (37.5%) who had worked for 5 years or less, 247 (28.6%) who had worked for 6–10 years, and 292 (33.9%) who had worked for more than 10 years. Only 16 individuals worked part-time at other medical institutions. A total of 48.7% of them had working experience in general hospitals. More than half of the staff (54.7%) had a bachelor’s degree, followed by a college degree (38.5%). The professional titles of the staff were mainly junior (48.4%) and middle level (29.8%). Among all employees, there were 261 doctors (30.3%), 473 nurses (54.8%) and 129 other personnel (14.9%) (including rehabilitation therapists, pharmacists and other workers). In addition, the majority of staff (73.6%) worked in urban areas, with only 26.4% working in districts, counties or townships outside urban areas.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the participants (n = 863)
Full size table

Home care experience of primary care providers

The experience of home care by primary care providers is shown in Table 2. More than half of them (57.4%) had been providing the service for < 3 years. Current services were provided to a variety of clients, with the majority being older adults ≥ 60 years or older, followed by people with disabilities and maternity. A total of 43.8% provided services to ≥ 3 types of clients. Only approximately 1 in 5 provided home care ≥ 1–2 times per week. Of all employees, the majority said they would be willing to perform home care services.

Table 2 Home care experience of the participants (n = 863)
Full size table

Home care practice behavior

The score of the home care practice behavior questionnaire was 97.25 ± 21.05. The average scores for the dimensions of home visit preparation, assessment, medical care behavior and safety practice were 3.70 ± 0.95, 3.76 ± 1.02, 3.66 ± 1.03, and 3.20 ± 0.46, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between all four dimensions in bivariate analyses. In particular, the safety practice score had the smallest correlation coefficient with the other three dimensions (r < 0.3, P < 0.001), and the correlation coefficients among the other dimensions were all > 0.7 (P < 0.001).

Associated factors

The univariate analyses showed that the primary care providers who were aged 30 years or younger, female, worked 5 years or less, had part-time employment in other organizations, had working experience in general hospitals, worked in urban areas, provided home care ≥ 3 years, had over 3 types of service clients, worked ≥ 1–2 times per week, and were very willing to serve had better home care practice behavior (Table 3).

Table 3 Univariate analyses of the factors associated with home care practice behavior (n = 863)
Full size table

Regression analyses examining covariates of home care practice behavior are presented in Table 4. In this model, working years, working experience in general hospitals, work area, experience of home care services such as client types, home care frequency and willingness were significant correlates, explaining 21.5% of the total model variance.

Table 4 Regression analysis examining covariates of home care practice behavior
Full size table

Discussion

Key results and interpretation

The purpose of this study was to examine how health care workers provided home care services in Chinese primary care settings. Among the 863 health care providers, 57.4% had been providing home care for < 3 years, and more than half provided the services once every 3 months or less than once every 6 months. These results indicated that the workload of home care in the primary care setting was lighter. This may be related to the late start of home care in China. Many organizations are limited in the number of service programs they can provide to their clients. While the main providers were still nurses [26], the frequency of services provided by other medical personnel such as rehabilitators and dietitians was relatively low in this study. Another important reason was that the insurance reimbursement measures for home health care were not yet perfect [41]. The number of services and insurance options that can be reimbursed for home health care were limited, and rarely reimbursed 100%. Many services needed clients to pay out-of-pocket, which also led to a low supply of services even though there was demand from clients. This needed the state to expand coverage in accordance with national conditions and to include more programs for home health care in the reimbursement. It could be tried that a family shares an account and pays through the young worker’s health insurance. Insurance companies can also develop commercial health insurance that covers home care to increase reimbursement pathways [42].

In recent years, the state had introduced several policies to promote the development of home care [24, 32, 43]. Especially after entering an aging society and implementing the two-child policy, Chinese residents had an increasing demand for health care and health promotion. More emphasis had been placed on providing services for elderly individuals, disabled and other special populations. This survey showed that the people receiving services were mainly elderly individuals ≥ 60 years old, disabled individuals and pregnant women, indicating that primary medical institutions were implementing national policies in place. In addition, the majority of primary care providers were willing to provide home care, closer to the results of a nationwide survey conducted in China [7].

Overall, the home care practice behavior of primary care providers was in the middle to upper level (97.25 ± 21.05). The best was the assessment of the clients, and the worst was the safety practice, which included patient and medical staff safety. Specifically, this referred to the adverse events that affect patient safety and unforeseen circumstances that affect the health and safety of medical staff themselves during the course of providing services in the home. A previous study conducted in Hunan Province, China, showed that nurses were concerned about the safety of patients and their own practice during home visits [44]. Furthermore, some relevant studies had also reported the need to enhance the safety management of home care [45, 46]. The six items in the safety practice dimension of this study included risk identification, use of the APP locator system, wearing an alarm device, occurrence of patient accidents, medical staff safety accidents, and requesting support, with the lowest scores for the items using the APP locator system and wearing an alarm device, which was in line with the results of other researchers [47]. Primary care organizations may have insufficient hardware facilities (including alarm devices) due to limited funds and cumbersome equipment purchase processes [47]. The lowest safety scores may also be related to factors such as smaller service jurisdictions, relative familiarity with clients in the area, and low attention from medical staff [35]. The attention of medical institutions should be drawn to how to help them guarantee the use of material resources, raise the medical staff awareness of safety and protection, and thus regulate their safety practice behavior. The other two dimensions with scores in the middle were home visit preparation and medical care behavior. This included taking an itemized inventory of item preparation prior to the visit and strict adherence to specifications after the visit. Adequate preparation and proper implementation of these two elements also mean double security and better service outcomes for both doctors and patients, and vice versa.

Our study found that home care practice behavior was worse for those who had worked ≥ 6 years. This result may differ from normal thinking. It may be that home health care in China started late and had only been gradually standardized in the last five years [32]. Most of the medical staff who had worked for ≥ 6 years were already at an intermediate level in primary health institutions and had more opportunities to take on managerial responsibilities than to provide services in the home. Lower seniority and relatively younger staff may undertake more home service work. Despite the shorter working time, the young medical staff in this survey had relatively higher qualifications and stronger basic competencies in their own right. In addition, those who had been working for more than six years usually faced stress, which comes from marriage and childbirth, restricted job development, and family care burden [48], and increased as age and working years increased, making them more susceptible to burnout and affecting the completion and quality of home care [49, 50]. Hence, focusing on people who work longer and understanding their needs is essential to enhancing their practice behaviors.

Previous worked in a general hospital and current working in an urban area were contributing factors to the home care practice behavior of primary care providers. Personnel who had worked in general hospitals had better practice behavior. They usually had extensive experience in the treatment of complex diseases and emergency management. Not only were there many opportunities for training and learning, but there was also a stricter code of ethics and behavior. In particular, medical personnel have been needed to undergo 2–3 years of standardized training in general hospitals after graduating from school in recent years [51], rotating through different types of departments to acquire comprehensive theoretical and operational skills, better and rapidly adapt to the clinical environment and enter the medical role [52]. The level of medical staff behavior varied in different hospitals, as well as in different regions. Residents living in rural areas had lower utilization rates of outpatient clinics and preventive health services, and thus less access to services than those in urban areas [53, 54]. At the same time, the lower economic income and poorer environment in rural areas led to a concentration of professionals mostly in urban areas, further contributing to the imbalance in human resources, which was the reason for the better home care practice behavior of medical personnel in urban areas. The state is currently reducing disparities by taking measures such as the sinking of high-quality medical resources from cities and alliances of urban and rural institutions, but the specific implementation measures and their effects in the future have yet to be further explored.

Our research showed that the home care experience was related to their practice behavior. Greater types of clients served and higher service frequency were important factors for better home care practice behavior. Home care is faced with numerous uncertainties, such as unfamiliar environments, complex disease and care needs, and diverse work content [55, 56]. This placed higher demands on the behavior of medical personnel. Having a thorough understanding of the client’s health condition and preparing the relevant materials and documents according to their needs was essential prior to the visit. Immediately after the visit, the client was assessed and treated accordingly. During this process, various unexpected situations may occur, and medical staff need to react quickly and master the emergency treatment process. The greater the variety of clients served and the higher frequency of service, the more conducive it was to the enhancement of the professional skills and emergency response capabilities of the medical staff. This experience-based behavior enabled primary care providers to assess what a situation requires and act accordingly based on both professional and conditional practical experience [57, 58]. Primary health care institutions can organize regular training and assessment related to the operational skills and theories needed for common service items of home health care. At the same time, drills are conducted for common emergency resuscitation and adverse events. The effectiveness of the training can be enhanced by making full use of modern Internet technology, simulation laboratories and VR [59, 60].

As revealed in the multiple linear regression models, willingness to serve was significantly associated with home care practice behavior. The higher home care willingness of providers, the more motivated they were to work and the more able they were to engage in self-directed learning and regulate their own behavior. In this study, we also found that 77.6% of primary care providers expressed that they would be willing to provide home care for clients, which was in the middle of the range compared to the results of previous studies [7, 61]. According to the previous literature [7, 62,63,64], willingness to engage in home care may be influenced by a variety of factors, such as age, education, income, and practice safety. Medical professionals with low willingness had lower quality of care and poorer job stability, similar to the poorer home care practice behavior findings in this study. According to the hospital’s own situation, managers can strengthen publicity to deepen providers’ understanding of home care. On the other hand, they should understand the needs of workers and take targeted measures such as providing safety support and adjusting welfare benefits to increase their willingness to provide home care services, thus promoting the standardization of home care practice behavior.

Limitations

Because of the cross-sectional design, we could not judge the combined effect of multiple factors on home care practice behavior, nor could we infer causality. Although this study surveyed primary care providers at 62 medical institutions, they were all located within Sichuan Province and were not representative of national data. In addition, the survey instrument used in this study was tested by exploratory factor analysis. And other methods, such as confirmatory factor analysis, can be used to improve the reliability and usefulness of the questionnaire in subsequent studies. We also encountered some difficulties during the study, including irregularities in questionnaire completion, insufficient sample size, and low participation of certain organizations. In the future, we will strengthen the publicity of home health care and emphasize to the participants the great significance of questionnaire completion for the study to include a larger number of organizations and populations.

Conclusions

The home care practice behavior of primary care providers scored above the questionnaire average and was in the middle to upper level. The assessment was the best performing, followed by home visit preparation and medical care behavior. The safety practice did the worst, which needs to be focused on and further improved. Factors associated with home care practice behavior included working year, working experience in a general hospital, work area, home care experience and willingness to serve. Moreover, such innovative programs should be considered within the Chinese primary care provider context to support this crucial patient care workforce.

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. WHO. Ageing and life course in 2019.World Health Organization. Ageing and Life Course in 2019. 2019. https://www.who.int/ageing/en/. Accessed 25 June 2019.

  2. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 1 Oct 2022.

  3. National Bureau of Statistics. China Population Census Yearbook. China Statistics; 2021.

  4. Li SQ, Zhang J, Liu Y, Wang AP, Qiu GX. Survey of the demand for care services for older people and the training needs of their care workers: a cross-sectional study in Northeast China. BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1).

  5. Feng ZL, Liu C, Guan XP, Mor V. China’s rapidly aging population creates policy challenges in shaping a viable long-term care system. Health Aff. 2012;31(12):2764–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ornstein KA, Leff B, Covinsky KE, Ritchie CS, Federman AD, Roberts L, et al. Epidemiology of the homebound population in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1180–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma GY, Hou JM, Peng S, Luo LX, Xu R, Liu YH, et al. Nurses’ willingness and demand for internet plus home care services and its influencing factors in different levels of hospitals in China - a nationwide survey. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022;15:1395–405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeng Y, Chen HS, Wang ZL, Land KC. Implications of changes in households and living arrangements for future home-based care needs and costs for disabled elders in China. J Aging Health. 2015;27(3):519–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang ZY, Wei HC, Liu ZH. Older adults’ demand for community-based adult services (cbas) integrated with medical care and its influencing factors: a pilot qualitative study in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):14869.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Drennan VM. More care out of hospital? A qualitative exploration of the factors influencing the development of the district nursing workforce in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019;24(1):11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hecimovic A, Matijasevic V, Frost SA. Characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving hospital at home services in the south west of Sydney. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1).

  12. Zhou J, Walker A. The impact of community care services on the preference for ageing in place in urban China. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29(4):1041–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinck SM. A theoretical framework of home-based professional nursing practice. Home Healthc now. 2022;40(3):146–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaartio-Rajalin H, Fagerstrom L. Professional care at home: Patient-centredness, interprofessionality and effectivity? A scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27(4):E270–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stall N, Nowaczynski M, Sinha SK. Systematic review of outcomes from home-based primary care programs for homebound older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(12):2243–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Siclovan DM, Bang JT, Yakusheva O et al. Effectiveness of home health care in reducing return to hospital: evidence from a multi-hospital study in the US. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021; 119.

  17. Arnett K, Sudore RL, Nowels D, Feng CX, et al. Advance care planning: understanding clinical routines and experiences of interprofessional team members in diverse health care settings. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017;34(10):946–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomez-Centurion I, Oarbeascoa G, Garcia MC, et al. Implementation of a hospital-at-home (hah) unit for hematological patients during the covid-19 pandemic: safety and feasibility. Int J Hematol. 2022;115(1):61–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardicre NK, Birks Y, Murray J et al. Partners at care transitions (pact)-exploring older peoples’ experiences of transitioning from hospital to home in the uk: Protocol for an observation and interview study of older people and their families to understand patient experience and involvement in care at transitions. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(11).

  20. Sears N, Baker GR, Barnsley J, Shortt S. The incidence of adverse events among home care patients. Int J Qual Health C. 2013;25(1):16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morioka N, Kashiwagi M. Adverse events in home-care nursing agencies and related factors: a nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5).

  22. Klingshirn H, Gerken L, Hofmann K et al. How to improve the quality of care for people on home mechanical ventilation from the perspective of healthcare professionals: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1).

  23. Malmedal W, Ingebrigtsen O, Saveman B-I. Inadequate care in Norwegian nursing homes - as reported by nursing staff. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009;23(2):231–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sichuan Provincial Health and Wellness Commission. Sichuan Province on strengthening home medical services for the elderly work implementation plan (Trial). 2021. http://wsjkw.sc.gov.cn/scwsjkw/sclljk/2021/5/28/e087ec5b275d42acaab752c9c1daf24a.shtml. Accessed 28 May 2021.

  25. Ren Y, Yang Z. Application of smart healthcare in ltci, outpatient mutual-aid guarantee mechanism, and sustainability of medical insurance fund for urban employees. J Healthc Eng. 2022.

  26. Liu Z, Yan YL. Exploring the Development Path to Home-Based Health Service from the perspective of active aging. Chin Health Service Manage. 2021;38(03):175–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao BS, Wang W, Yi M, Lv H, Zhang XM, Liu YJ, et al. Nurses’ perceptions of engaging in internet-based nursing services: a qualitative study based on three hospitals in China. Nurs Open. 2023;10(10):6856–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukada M. Nursing competency: definition, structure and development. Yonago Acta Med. 2018;61(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. American Nurses Association. Home Health Nursing: Scope & Standards of Practice. 2nd ed.2014.

  30. Gorski LA. Implementing home health standards in clinical practice. Home Healthc now. 2016;34(2):76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bin Rusli KD, Tan AJQ, Ong SF et al. Home-based nursing care competencies: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2021.

  32. National Health Commission. Notice on strengthening the work of home medical services for the elderly. 2020. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7653pd/202012/19a2617ba8e641bea9ac2472ea04c82a.shtml. Accessed 29 Dec 2020.

  33. He J, Ouyang NX, Guo XF, et al. Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular disease (crhcp): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10380):928–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun YX, Mu JJ, Wang DW, et al. A village doctor-led multifaceted intervention for blood pressure control in rural China: an open, cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2022;399(10339):1964–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao H, Liu SZ, Li H. The safety support and willingness of providing home care services by medical staff of primary health care institutions. Chin Gen Prac. 2022;25(34):4326–31.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xiong Z, Feng W, Li Z. Availability of family care resources, type of primary caregiving and home death among the oldest-old: a population-based retrospective cohort study in China. SSM Popul Health. 2022;20.

  37. Yu YS, Zhang J, Song C, et al. Perceived availability of home- and community-based services and self-reported depression among Chinese older adults: a cross-sectional study. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(5):E2827–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Narayan M, Farris C, Harris MD, Hiong FY. Development of the international guidelines for home health nursing. Home Healthc now. 2017;35(9):494–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang XY. Influencing factors and the mechanism of home -based primary care by familydoctor in city. Peking Union Medical College; 2021.

  40. Hoff T, DePuccio M. Medical home implementation gaps for seniors: perceptions and experiences of primary care medical practices. J Appl Gerontol. 2018;37(7):817–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cao SY, Xue HY. The impact of long-term care insurance system on family care: evidence from China. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023;38(5):1435–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fang Y. Diversified Social Security for Home-based Care: International Experience and Enlightenment. Med Philos. 2023;44(07):42–6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. National Health Commission. Notice on the comprehensive strengthening of health services for the elderly. 2021. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-01/18/content_5669095.htm. Accessed 31 Dec 2021.

  44. Tian YZ, Wang L, Tan HH, et al. Qualitative research on practice experience of internet + Nursing Service nurses under the mode of nursing consortium. J Nurs Train. 2022;37(17):1593–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Grov EK, Ytrehus S. Do you feel safe at home? A qualitative study among home-dwelling older adults with advanced incurable cancer. Healthcare. 2022;10(12):2384.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lette M, Ambugo EA, Hagen TP, et al. Addressing safety risks in integrated care programs for older people living at home: a scoping review. Bmc Geriatr. 2020;20(1):81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen T, Yao NL, Su MZ, Nong S, Bai M, Ma ZY. Challenges of Home-based Medical Care in China: a telephone interview from the perspectives of Home Care Providers. Chin Gen Prac. 2020;23(12):1459–65.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Guo HX, Ni CP, Liu CQ et al. Perceived job stress among community nurses: a multi-center cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019; 25(1).

  49. Kosan Z, Aras A, Cayir Y, Calikoglu EO. Burnout among family physicians in Turkey: a comparison of two different primary care systems. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(8):1063–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. White EM, Aiken LH, McHugh MD. Registered nurse burnout, job dissatisfaction, and missed care in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(10):2065–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Xiao Y, Zhu SY, Huang YH. Standardised training system for specialists in China: a new opportunity and challenge for doctors. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98(e3):E155–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao SJ, Duan X, Cheng L, Jiang JX. Perspective and experience of newly graduated registered nurses with standardized training in the emergency department: a qualitative study in Shanghai, China. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;105.

  53. Shi ZY, He P, Zhu DW, Lu F, Meng QY. Changes in health care utilization and financial protection after integration of the rural and urban social health insurance schemes in Beijing, China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1).

  54. Liu X, Li NX, Liu CJ et al. Urban-rural disparity in utilization of preventive care services in China. Medicine 2016; 95(37).

  55. Busnel C, Vallet F, Ludwig C. Tooling nurses to assess complexity in routine home care practice: derivation of a complexity index from the interrai-hc. Nurs Open. 2021;8(2):815–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hulen E, Laliberte A, Ono S, Saha S, Edwards ST. Eyes in the home: addressing social complexity in veterans affairs home-based primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(4):894–900.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Andrade AM, Silva KL, Seixas CT, Braga PP. Nursing practice in home care: an integrative literature review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(1):210–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brenne BA, Hedlund M, Ingstad K. Exploring home-based care nurses’ mindset for nursing practices: A phenomenological study. BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1).

  59. Goto Y, Miura H, Yamaguchi Y, Onishi J. Evaluation of an advance care planning training program for practice professionals in Japan incorporating shared decision making skills training: a prospective study of a curricular intervention. BMC Palliat Care. 2022; 21(1).

  60. Lin HC, Hwang GJ, Chou KR, Tsai CK. Fostering complex professional skills with interactive simulation technology: a virtual reality-based flipped learning approach. Brit J Educ Technol. 2022;54(2):622–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Huang RD, Xu M, Li XT, Wang YP, Wang B, Cui NX. Internet-based sharing nurse program and nurses’ perceptions in China: Cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(7).

  62. Tourangeau AE, Patterson E, Saari M, et al. Work-related factors influencing home care nurse intent to remain employed. Health Care Manage Rev. 2017;42(1):87–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Peng JK, Chiu TY, Hu WY, et al. What influences the willingness of community physicians to provide palliative care for patients with terminal cancer? Evidence from a nationwide survey. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(3):278–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Jeong HI, Nam T, Hong M, Kim KH. Home healthcare service awareness survey for Korean medicine doctors: a survey study. J Pharmacopunct. 2023;26(1):60–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the 863 participants who responded to the surveys and the administrators from the collaborating hospitals for supporting this investigation.

Funding

The questionnaire development, data collection and analysis for this research were funded by the West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University. (HXHL19018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Luling Zhou & Suzhen Liu

  2. Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Hang Li

Authors
  1. Luling Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suzhen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZLL and LSZ contributed to the study conceptualization, design, and data analysis. ZLL wrote the main manuscript text. ZLL and LH contributed to the data collection and collation. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzhen Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2020 − 165). Participants signed an informed consent form prior to the start of the study. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, L., Liu, S. & Li, H. Home care practice behavior and its influencing factors of primary care providers: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Sichuan Province, China. BMC Nurs 23, 303 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01948-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01948-3

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us