Skip to main content
Download PDF

Perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ mental health: a work-family perspective

BMC Nursing volume 23, Article number: 504 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nurses are particularly at risk from stress-related problems and face high mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is critical to pay attention to their mental health status and determine which factors are positively associated with nursing staff mental health from the perspective of work-family. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of perceived ambidextrous leadership on nurses’ mental health mediated by work-to-family enrichment and moderated by work climate for sharing family concerns.

Methods

One time-lagged study with three waves was conducted. A total of 358 questionnaires were distributed to registered nurses working at 10 hospitals in Guangzhou, China, and 265 valid questionnaires were returned. The quantitative approach to test hypotheses involves hierarchical regression analyses, the bootstrapping method and the simple slope test.

Results

The research indicated that (a) perceived ambidextrous leadership had a positive influence on nurses’ work-to-family enrichment; (b) nurses’ work-to-family enrichment mediated the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ mental health; (c) work climate for sharing family concerns moderated the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ work-to-family enrichment.

Conclusion

Nursing supervisors’ ambidextrous leadership interacted with work climate for sharing family concerns benefit the conservation of nurses’ personal resources, which in turn facilitates nurses’ work-to-family enrichment and improve their mental health.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

During the COVID-19 pandemic, worldwide health systems are overwhelmed, accompanied by shortages of medical resources. Nurses undertake high-intensity work and are liable to extend their working hours, which results in the experience of role overload [1]. In combination with traditional features of the nursing profession (e.g., shiftwork and flexibility of work scheduling), it is unattainable for nurses to consider their work and family as separate domains [2, 3]. Nurses are confronted with more strain and passive outcomes from work-family interference compared to other occupations [4, 5]. Work-family issues during the COVID-19 pandemic seriously trouble nurses, which further leads to stress burnout and psychological unhealth [3, 6, 7].

Considering the potential poor mental health condition of the nursing profession during the COVID-19 pandemic [3, 8,9,10,11,12], work-to-family enrichment may help relieve the pressure. However, there is limited knowledge concerning work-to-family enrichment among nurses in previous research [13,14,15]. Work-family enrichment, including work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment, refers to the extent to which experiences in the family/work role can improve the quality of life in the other role [16]. A meta-analysis including 67 studies lends support to the notion that work-to-family enrichment contributes to health conditions [17]. Thus, we focus on work-to-family enrichment, considering pressure mainly caused by heavy work and prob in relation to nurses’ mental health.

Bakker et.al. [18] noted that a resource gain spiral can be attributed to work-to-family enrichment. Based on job demands-resources theory, leadership is considered to have a direct impact on employees’ job resources and personal resources [19]. That is, the influence of leadership can be a significant antecedent of work-to-family enrichment. Nevertheless, the previous study merely focuses on the effect of single leadership on work-to-family enrichment in static situations, neglecting the subsistence of the combination of different leadership types in a dynamic management environment [13, 20,21,22]. In the last decade, theorists have proposed one new leadership type termed ambidextrous leadership, combining two complementary leadership behaviors, that is, closing leader behaviors, which include establishing routines and controlling target achievement, and opening leader behaviors, which comprise motivating subordinates to take risks and encouraging different ways to achieve job tasks [23]. From a dialectical perspective, health organizations are complex in nature and are confronted with changing and contradictory requirements that resemble those of other industries [23]. These requirements, especially existing in the work-family interface, are constantly contradictory and contain fundamentally different logics and patterns, which need to be coordinated and integrated by supervisors with limited organizational resources [24]. Ambidextrous leadership, as a combination of complementary leadership, enables leaders to discharge contradictory tasks and manage complicated situations [25]. With regard to the work-family interface, ambidextrous leadership assists subordinates with their work-family role overlap issues and provides them with heterogeneous resources for the promotion of work-to-family enrichment. Therefore, this research aims to examine whether ambidextrous leadership, as perceived by followers, enhances work-to-family enrichment in nurses.

The work-home resources model posits that different dimensions of resources (contextual and personal resources, volatile and structural resources, key resources and macro resources) influence work-family enrichment through different mechanisms [26]. Organizational work climate, as a specific aspect of employees’ social context, refers to the shared perceptions of collective employees concerning their perceptions of the organizational environment [27]. Based on the conservation of resources theory [28, 29], organizational work climate can be regarded as a source of resources, which in turn facilitates employees’ work-to-family enrichment by providing work-related resources [26]. Specifically, a few studies have identified the influence of work climate for sharing family concerns on the work-family interface [30,31,32,33]. Thus, this paper also investigates the moderating role of work climate for sharing family concerns on the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and work-family enrichment.

Theoretical background and hypotheses

Perceived ambidextrous leadership and work-to-family enrichment

Based on the work-home resources model [26], work-related resources may have a positive impact on the family domain. Supervisors can affect subordinates’ working environment by providing a large proportion of work-related resources and demands for them [34]. To date, a few studies have identified the influence of leader-member exchange, authentic leadership, servant leadership and empowering leadership on work-to-familyenrichment [13, 20,21,22]. Concerning nursing management,Cortese et.al. [35] also regard workplace leadership as helping nurses manage the relationship with their families. In addition, during the COVID-19 pandemic, nurses are under massive physical and emotional strain [36]. It is, therefore, more difficult to enhance nurses’ work-to-family enrichment, given contradictory requirements between the family domain and work domain [37].

Ambidextrous leadership is usually viewed as one leadership style that can address changing and contradictory requirements. Drawing from the work-home resources model [26], work-related resources derived from ambidextrous leadership can contribute to a gain spiral of personal resources and further improve the accumulation of family-related resources, which facilitates work-to-family enrichment. Specifically, ambidextrous leadership consists of opening leadership and closing leadership. Openning leadership provides room for employees to think and work independently [23, 25]. With job autonomy, which is one core dimension of job design [38], employees are endowed with a set of psychological capital, including psychological empowerment [39] and psychological ownership [40]. These various work domain resources further yield personal resources such as self-efficacy [41, 42], self-esteem [43] and vitality [42], which in turn improve the quality of life in the family domain. Closing leadership can reduce the variance of nurse behaviors and provide specific guidelines for uniform task attainment [23, 25]. When subordinates receive clear information about the job goal and superior’s constant feedback during the work, role clarity comes into being [44, 45]. Accordingly, individuals’ cognitive and physical demands about job design are reduced, which leads to the accumulation of personal resources [28, 29]. As a result, these extra personal resources can be devoted to the other domain, the family domain, in which the quality of life is improved [26]. Therefore, the current research proposes the following hypothesis:

Hypothesis 1

Perceived ambidextrous leadership is positively related to nurses’ work-to-family enrichment.

The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment between perceived ambidextrous leadership and mental health among nurses

Nurses’ mental health care is an increasingly critical topic and a huge challenge in nursing management, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic [8, 9, 46]. For instance, a survey of 1257 nurses in China found that over half of the participants experienced negative psychological emotions when treating patients exposed to COVID-19 [47]. In addition, many studies have indicated that nurses are one of the groups experiencing job burnout due to role overload and high work stress [48, 49], so they usually suffer from depression and anxiety [49].

Brummelhuis and Bakker [26] posit that work-to-family enrichment leads to the generation of personal resources (including physical, psychological, intellectual, affective, and capital resources) that are proximate to the self, contrary to contextual resources related to the special domain. These personal resources can be invested in nonwork-related activities such as leisure and, in turn, may benefit individual psychological health and general well-being. As studied by a meta-analysis [50], work-to-family enrichment is positively associated with physical and mental health. The findings are consistent with other similar studies [17]. Integrating Hypothesis 1, we regard perceived ambidextrous leadership as beneficial for nurses’ work-to-family enrichment and the maintenance of mental health. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:

Hypothesis 2

The work-to-family enrichment of nurses mediates the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and mental health, that is, specifically, depression and anxiety.

The moderating role of work climate for sharing family concerns

The work-home resources model [26] accentuates that social support, as the contextual resource provided by significant individuals within certain work environments, can influence the work-family enrichment process. Social information processing theory posits “the main argument is that there is some substitutability among cues such that effects can be communicated using some cues at the neglect of others” [51] (p. 3). Walther regards proximal social cues can substitute for distal social cues [51]. The work climate for sharing family concerns, as one specific aspect of workplace social support, refers to the organizational climate that encourages employees to share their concerns about the family domain within their work domain role [30, 52]. This construct has been found to directly and indirectly influence individual work and family life [30,31,32,33]. Moreover, in line with contingency theory [53], with internal fit among key components within an organization, such as individual leadership behavior and organizational environment, a coherent ensemble comes into being, within which originally independent elements interact interdependently. More specifically, leadership behavior has a distinct influence on subordinates depending on the situational variables in the organization [54].

Therefore, we assume that the work climate for sharing family concerns moderates the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ work-to-family enrichment. When the work climate is characterized by sharing family concerns, the individual tends to discuss family concerns with peers. Compared with interactions with leaders, interpersonal relationships among colleagues are characterized by a greater sense of informality and ease, devoid of hierarchical power dynamics [55]. Colleagues engage in discussions encompassing a wide range of subjects, including familial matters, professional endeavors, and personal experiences [56]. Consequently, employees are more inclined to express their thoughts and emotions to their colleagues, thereby receiving a heightened level of emotional support from them as compared to their leaders. According to social information processing theory, colleagues can be viewed as proximal social cues and leadership can be viewed as distal social cues [51]. Accordingly, a substitution effect of colleagues appears with regard to the impact of leadership on nurses’ work-to-family enrichment. Specifically, colleagues serve as a source of resources for employees. While sharing feelings and concerns with colleagues about the family role and receiving feedback, individuals gain colleagues’ social support. These contextual resources can help them manage work-family issues [57] and may further enhance work-to-family enrichment [33]. This substitution effect will, in turn, lessen the influence of the superior’s leadership behavior on subordinates. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis. Figure 1 shows our overall conceptual model.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Theoretical hypothesis model

Full size image

Hypothesis 3

A work climate for sharing family concerns moderates the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ work-to-family enrichment. When the work climate for sharing family concerns is higher, the effect of perceived ambidextrous leadership on nurses’ work-to-family enrichment is weaker.

Method

Participants and data collection

The participants for the current study were registered nurses working at 10 hospitals in Guangzhou, China, for the past 12 months. This study excludes nurses who are no longer engaged in clinical nursing work. Data are gathered through convenience sampling. Among the hospitals, 2 hospitals had a capacity of less than 100 beds, 2 hospitals had a capacity of 100–250 beds, and 6 hospitals had a capacity of over 250 beds.

Data were collected from August 2021 to December 2021. First, we obtained approval to conduct the survey from the 10 directors of the target hospitals. Second, each nurse was provided with a questionnaire and a return sealed envelope and told only for academic purposes. To control the concern of common method bias, a time-lagged design was adopted with a 2-month interval. A total of 358 participants rated the demographic information, ambidextrous leadership, and work climate for sharing family concerns. Two months later, 295 of 358 participants rated work-to-family enrichment. Another two months later, 271 of 295 participants rated their mental health. We matched the three-wave survey by a consistent and independent code and received 265 final usable responses.

The sociodemographic characteristics of the nurses are indicated in Table 1. Of the 265 respondents, 27.92% were male, and 72.08% were female. A total of 35.85% were aged 18 years old to 25 years old, and 31.32% were aged 26 years old to 30 years old. A total of 60.38% possessed a bachelor’s degree, and 63.40% were married. A total of 33.21% had one child, and 16.60% had two children. A total of 44.91% reported monthly salaries ranging from 5001 yuan to 10,000 yuan. We found no significant differences in the demographic variables between the full respondents and partial respondents.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of nurses
Full size table

Measure

Perceived ambidextrous leadership

We adopted Zacher and Rosing’s [25] 14-item scale. Seven items belong to the opening leadership dimension, and the other 7 items belong to the closing leadership dimension. We adopted Zacher and Rosing’s scale because it had been tested with good reliability and validity in the Chinese context (e.g., Ma et.al. [58]). Sample items are “My supervisor pays attention to uniform task accomplishment” and “My supervisor gives possibilities for independent thinking and acting”. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.906.

Work-to-family enrichment

We adopted Carlson et.al.’s [59] 9-item scale. Sample items are “the involvement in my work helps me to gain knowledge and this helps me be a better family member” and “the involvement in my work helps me acquire skills and this helps me be a better family member”. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.950.

Work climate for sharing family concerns

We adopted Kossek et.al.’s [52] 3-item scale. Sample items are “In my department, it is generally accepted that people might share concerns about their family” and “In my department, it is generally accepted that people can get advice on how to deal with family issues”. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.842.

Mental health

We adopted the Löwe et.al.’s [60] clinically validated PHQ-4 scale to measure mental health disease. Sample items are “In the last week, how often have you been bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing things” and “In the last week, how often have you been bothered by feeling down, depressed, or hopeless”. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.917.

Control variables

We followed prior studies on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic [61, 62] to control for gender (1 = male, 2 = female), age (1 = 18–25, 2 = 26–30, 3 = 31–40, 4 = 41–50; 5 = 51–60), educational background (1 = high school, 2 = associate degree, 3 = bachelor’s degree, 4 = master’s/doctoral degree), marital status (1 = not married, 2 = married), number of children (1 = 0 child, 2 = 1 child, 3 = 2 children, 4 = 3 children) and family monthly income (1 = 0-5000 yuan, 2 = 10,001–20,000 yuan, 3 = 20,001–30,000 yuan, 4 = 30,001–40,000 yuan, 5 = 40,001–50,000 yuan).

Results

Descriptive statistics and correlations among variables

We used SPSS 21.0 to analyzed the correlations among variables. Table 2 indicates the mean, SD and correlations among all the variables. The mean scores for perceived ambidextrous leadership, work-to-family enrichment, work climate for sharing family concerns and mental health disease were 3.871 (SD = 0.662), 3.894 (SD = 0.802), 3.442 (SD = 0.744) and 1.947 (SD = 0.857), respectively. Perceived ambidextrous leadership was positively correlated with work-to-family enrichment. Mental health was negatively correlated with perceived ambidextrous leadership and work-to-family enrichment.

Table 2 Means, SD and correlation Note: n = 265; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05
Full size table

Common method analysis

Considering that all variables are evaluated by employees, common method bias may be a concern. A time-lagged design was adopted to reduce common method bias. In addition, we added one unmeasured latent method factor by using MPLUS 7.4 when running confirmatory factor analysis and analysis the changes of model fit indicators (ΔCFI = 0, ΔTLI = 0.01, ΔRMSEA = 0.01, ΔSRMR = 0). Therefore, common method variance is not a serious concern in our study.

Confirmatory factor analysis

We adopted MPLUS 7.4 to conduct a CFA test to evaluate the distinctness of variables. Table 3 indicates a four-factor model (x2/df = 2.950; CFI = 0.923; TLI = 0.905; RMSEA = 0.090; SRMR = 0.049) meets the indices of global model fit and fits better than the other models.

Table 3 Measure model
Full size table

Hypothesis test

We used SPSS 21.0 to test all the hypotheses. Hypothesis 1 predicted a positive relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and work-to-family enrichment. Table 4 shows that perceived ambidextrous leadership was positively related to work-to-family enrichment (Model 2, β = 0.596, p = 0.000). Thus, Hypothesis 1 was supported.

Table 4 Results of regression analyses
Full size table

Hypothesis 2 predicted the indirect effect of work-to-family enrichment between perceived ambidextrous leadership and mental health. We conducted a bootstrapping method in PROCESS of SPSS 21.0. First, perceived ambidextrous leadership was negatively related to mental health disease (Model 5, β=-0.232, p = 0.005) and positively related to work-to-family enrichment (Model 2, β = 0.596, p = 0.000). The significance of the impact of perceived ambidextrous leadership on mental health disease decreases and becomes nonsignificant (β = -0.034, n.s.) when work-to-family enrichment is entered before the independent variable. In addition, a bootstrapping model was adopted to further test the mediation effect hypothesis. Table 5 indicates that the indirect effect of perceived ambidextrous leadership on mental health disease through work-to-family enrichment was statistically significant because the bias-corrected 95% CI [-0.362, -0.012] excluded zero. Thus, Hypothesis 2 was supported.

Table 5 Indirect effects of ambidextrous leadership on mental health disease via work-to-family enrichment
Full size table

Hypothesis 3 predicted the moderation effect of work climate for sharing family concerns on the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and work-to-family enrichment. As shown in Table 4, the interaction between perceived ambidextrous leadership and work climate for sharing family concerns was negatively related to work-to-family enrichment (Model 3, β=-0.149, p = 0.035). A simple slope test was further conducted. Specifically, work-to-family enrichment was regressed on ambidextrous leadership at high values (mean + 1 sd) and low values (mean-1 sd) of work climate for sharing family concerns. The relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and work-to-family enrichment was positive and significant when work climate for sharing family concerns was high (r = 0.462, t = 5.308, p < 0.001). The relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and work-to-family enrichment was positive and significant when work climate for sharing family concerns was low (r = 0.682, t = 9.096, p < 0.001). The results showed the slope at low work climate for sharing family concerns was steeper than the slope at high work climate for sharing family concerns. The interaction effect is graphically depicted in Fig. 2. Thus, Hypothesis 3 was supported.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Simple slope test

Full size image

Discussion

The present study investigated the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ mental health via work-to-family enrichment moderated by the work climate for sharing family concerns based on the work-home resources model [26]. Through a time-lagged survey in the hospital, we found that nurses’ perceived ambidextrous leadership was positively related to nurses’ work-to-family enrichment and reduced mental health disease. Work climate for sharing family concerns moderated the relationship between perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ work-to-family enrichment, such that the relationship is stronger when work climate for sharing family concerns is low rather than high.

Theoretical implications

First, our study provided a constructive perspective, the perspective of work-to-family enrichment, by applying the work-home resources model, to nurses’ mental health literature [26]. Few studies are grounded in the perspective of WFE to investigate nurses’ mental health, even previous studies provide some work-related coping strategies for the high levels of negative mental health that nurses face [63, 64]. This study found that work-to-family enrichment can help alleviate mental health diseases. Work-to-family enrichment helps nurses deal with job difficulties by developing critical psychological and physical resources. This finding is striking because it is notable that there are salient differences in work demand and consequentially health conditions between nurses and salaried employees in other industries. Mark and Smith [63] indicate that nurses are particularly at risk from stress-related problems and face high mental health problems. Work-to-family enrichment can provide a sense of belonging, optimism, self-esteem and confidence [65]. Nurses suffering from mental health diseases can recover by integrating the above psychological resources.

Second, our study advanced the boundary condition in the nursing management context from the conjoint perspective of leadership and climate. Cai et.al. [66] found that ambidextrous leadership could promote clinical leadership and nurses’ work engagement. However, the boundary condition of the effect of ambidextrous leadership has not been investigated. This paper is grounded in social information processing theory and regards colleagues as proximal social cues and leadership as distal social cues. The proximal social cues can substitute for distal social cues. This study found that perceived ambidextrous leadership interacting with a work climate for sharing concerns predicts nurses’ work-to-family enrichment and, sequentially, their mental health. This finding is notable because ambidextrous leadership becomes more effective in the nursing management field under a given climate. This is in accordance with the leadership contingency theory that leadership effectiveness depends on situational control [67]. As Fiedler [67] noted, “a high degree of control and influence implies that the leader has correspondingly high certainty that his decisions and actions will have predictable results and that they will achieve the desired goals and gratify the leader’s needs in the situation” (p. 62). Future studies can investigate the interaction between leadership and other contextual factors (e.g., culture, rules and organizational norms) in the nursing context.

Third, our study contributes to the mechanism of nurses’ mental health. This paper found that perceived ambidextrous leadership is critical for nursing management via enhancing work-to-family enrichment. Previous ambidextrous leadership studies were mostly performed in manufacturing, financial service, and hospitality contexts [58]. Only one study focused on ambidextrous leadership in the nursing context [66]. Ambidextrous leadership can tackle paradoxical problems in organizations [23]. In particular, during COVID-19, nurses faced huge job demands and stress [68]. Nurses are one of the professional groups at the front line of the fight against novel infectious diseases, but they also face substantial tasks and suffer from mental health problems [69]. Ambidextrous leadership can provide workplace support to nurses.

Practical implications

Workers in health organizations are puzzled by work-family issues due to heavy nursing jobs [70], which results in damage to mental health [6]. Our findings indicated that supervisors’ ambidextrous leadership interacting with the work climate to share concerns could lead nurses to high work-to-family enrichment and improve their mental health status.

First, our study indicated that nursing supervisors can promote nurses’ work-to-family enrichment by implementing ambidextrous leadership. Leadership can not only influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors in the workplace but also have a cross-domain effect on employees’ families through instrumental paths [16]. Specifically, when nursing tasks are routine and general, such as ward rounds and drug storage, nursing supervisors are supposed to clear nurses’ job requirements, design a standard workflow and establish routines. These measures can help nurses perceive predefined job roles, improve working efficiency and conserve cognitive resources [71].

Second, our findings validated the mediating role of work-to-family enrichment between perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ mental health. Thus, effective and feasible measures should be adopted to promote nurses’ work-to-family enrichment. Specifically, nurses can also enhance work-to-family enrichment by adjusting their work attitudes. Research has identified that work involvement, work centrality and work engagement benefit employees’ work-to-family enrichment [72]. That is, nurses are supposed to have a positive attitude toward their work, build emotional connections with organizations and colleagues, and seek meaning and enjoyment within the work role. Being more psychologically invested can not only result in the accumulation of personal valuable resources but also facilitate individuals’ work satisfaction [73]. When nurses maintain a positive mood in the workplace, a positive spillover from the work domain to the family domain occurs, and psychological problems such as anxiety and depression of nurses can also be alleviated.

Third, our findings supported the view that the work climate for sharing family concerns has a substitution effect on how to promote nurses’ work-to-family enrichment. Thus, health organizations should shape a family-friendly work climate for nurses to share family issues. Specifically, nursing supervisors are supposed to allow their subordinates to discuss family issues with colleagues in the workplace. Although conversation with others may not be beneficial for dealing with family problems, it helps the individual release psychological stress and negative emotions [74]. Moreover, nursing supervisors are supposed to encourage nurses to emotionally connect with their partners, which enables them to obtain advice on how to deal with family issues from the partners and then promote work-to-family enrichment.

Fourth, Nursing supervisors can provide nurses with psychological support, including psychological counseling services and mental health education. Supervisors can also organize some activities regularly to improve the communication and cooperation ability among nurses and enhance mutual understanding and support. In addition, supervisors can provide techniques and strategies for coping with stress, such as time management, relaxation training, and emotional regulation techniques.

Limitations and future research

First, despite a time-lagged survey, all the variables were reported by the nursing staff. The self-report measure may lead to inflated correlations among variables caused by common method bias [75]. Future studies may invite and match both nursing supervisors and nurse staff to rate ambidextrous leadership. Second, nurses’ personality may influence individuals’ mental health. Personality factors (e.g., proactive personality and Big Five personality) should be considered in future research [49]. Third, the majority of our sample is female because most nurse staff are female in China. Future studies may conduct comparable research between males and females. Fourth, we only invited nurses to rate their supervisors’ ambidextrous leadership but did not investigate how supervisors rate the organization managers’ ambidextrous leadership. Future studies may consider “trickle-down” effect of ambidextrous leadership from organization managers to nurses via team supervisors.

Data availability

The data can be provided on the request of readers.

References

  1. Zhang N, et al. Effects of role overload, work engagement and perceived organisational support on nurses’ job performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Nurs Manag; 2022.

  2. Yu J, et al. Association between work-family conflict and overall well-being among Chinese nurse leaders. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(7):1498–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen X, et al. The mediating role of resilience between work-family conflict and career development among Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(6):1733–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Skinner N, et al. An in-depth study of Australian nurses’ and midwives’ work-life interaction. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2011;49(2):213–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zandian H, Sharghi A, Moghadam TZ. Quality of work life and work-family conflict: a cross-sectional study among nurses in teaching hospitals. Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2020.

  6. Zurlo MC, Vallone F, Smith AP. Work-family conflict and psychophysical health conditions of nurses: gender differences and moderating variables. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020;17(3):e12324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeh TF, et al. Causes of nursing staff burnout: exploring the effects of emotional exhaustion, work-family conflict, and supervisor support. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2021;18(2):e12392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang QQ, et al. Anxiety, depression and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in Chinese nurses during the COVID-19 outbreak. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2021;29(5):1263–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Labrague LJ, de Los Santos JAA. Fear of COVID-19, psychological distress, work satisfaction and turnover intention among frontline nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(3):395–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Pinho LG et al. Portuguese Nurses’ Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Reduction Strategies during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021. 18(7).

  11. Segal L, Bolton T. Issues facing the future health care workforce: the importance of demand modelling. Aust New Z Health Policy. 2009;6:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schofield DJ. Replacing the projected retiring baby boomer nursing cohort 2001–2026. Bmc Health Services Research; 2007. p. 7.

  13. Zhou A, et al. Work–family spillover and crossover effects of authentic leadership in China. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2018;57(3):299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tummers LG, Dulk LD. The effects of work alienation on organisational commitment, work effort and work-to-family enrichment. J Nurs Manag. 2013;21(6):850–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Russo M, Buonocore F. The relationship between work-family enrichment and nurse turnover. J Managerial Psychol. 2012;27(3):216–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenhaus JHP. G. N., WHEN WORK AND FAMILY ARE ALLIES A THEORY OF WORK-FAMILY ENRICHMENT. Acad Manage Rev, 2006.

  17. Zhang Y, et al. The within and cross domain effects of work-family enrichment: a meta-analysis. J Vocat Behav. 2018;104:210–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bakker AB, et al. Applying the job demands–resources model to the work–home interface: a study among medical residents and their partners. J Vocat Behav. 2011;79(1):170–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tummers LG, Bakker AB. Leadership and Job demands-resources Theory: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:722080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tummers G, L. and, Bronkhorst BAC. The impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) on work-family interference and work-family facilitation. Personnel Rev. 2014;43(4):573–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang G, et al. Work–Family effects of servant Leadership: the roles of emotional exhaustion and personal learning. J Bus Ethics. 2015;137(2):285–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwan HK, Chen H, Chiu RK. Effects of empowering leadership on followers’ work–family interface. Int J Hum Resource Manage. 2020;33(7):1403–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosing K, Frese M, Bausch A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership. Leadersh Q. 2011;22(5):956–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Keller T, Weibler J. What it takes and costs to be an ambidextrous manager. J Leadersh Organizational Stud. 2014;22(1):54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zacher H, Rosing K. Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2015;36(1):54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brummelhuis B. A Resource Perspective on the Work-Home Interface The Work-Home Resources Model 2012.

  27. Kuenzi M, Schminke M. Assembling fragments into a Lens: a review, Critique, and proposed Research Agenda for the Organizational Work Climate Literature. J Manag. 2009;35(3):634–717.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hobfoll SE. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol. 2002;6(4):307–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas LT, Ganster DC. Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: a control perspective. J Appl Psychol. 1995;80(1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Y, et al. High-commitment work systems and middle managers’ innovative behavior in the Chinese context: the moderating role of work-life conflicts and work climate. Hum Resour Manag. 2018;57(5):1317–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kossek EE, et al. Workplace social support and work–family conflict: a meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family‐specific supervisor and organizational support. Pers Psychol. 2011;64(2):289–313.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang H, et al. Servant leadership, organizational identification, and work-to-family enrichment: the moderating role of work climate for sharing family concerns. Hum Resour Manag. 2012;51(5):747–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands-resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(3):273–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cortese CG, Colombo L, Ghislieri C. Determinants of nurses’ job satisfaction: the role of work-family conflict, job demand, emotional charge and social support. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2010;18(1):35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arnetz JE et al. Nurse reports of stressful situations during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative analysis of survey responses. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020. 17(21).

  37. Sahay S, Wei W. Work-Family Balance and Managing Spillover Effects Communicatively during COVID-19: Nurses’ Perspectives. Health Commun, 2021: p. 1–10.

  38. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Development of the job diagnostic survey. J Appl Psychol. 1975;60(2):159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(3):407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pierce JL, Jussila I, Cummings A. Psychological ownership within the job design context: revision of the job characteristics model. J Organizational Behav. 2009;30(4):477–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saragih S. The effects of job autonomy on work outcomes: self efficacy as an intervening variable. Int Res J Bus Stud, 2015. 4(3).

  42. Tummers L, et al. The effects of leadership and job autonomy on vitality: Survey and experimental evidence. Rev Public Personnel Adm. 2018;38(3):355–77.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pan X-F, Qin Q, Gao F. Psychological ownership, organization-based self-esteem and positive organizational behaviors. Chin Manage Stud, 2014.

  44. Hinkin TR, Schriesheim CA. An examination of nonleadership: from laissez-faire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(6):1234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kauppila O-P. So, what am I supposed to do? A Multilevel examination of Role Clarity. J Manage Stud. 2014;51(5):737–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sun N, et al. A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID-19 patients. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(6):592–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lai J, et al. Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes among Health Care workers exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang QQ, et al. Job burnout and quality of working life among Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(8):1835–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. De la Fuente-Solana EI, et al. Burnout and its relationship with personality factors in oncology nurses. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;30:91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McNall LA, Nicklin JM, Masuda AD. A Meta-Analytic Review of the consequences Associated with Work–Family Enrichment. J Bus Psychol. 2009;25(3):381–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Walther JB. Social information processing theory Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives, 2008. 391.

  52. Kossek EE, Colquitt JA, Noe RA. Caregiving decisions, well-being, and performance: the effects of place and provider as a function of dependent type and work-family climates. Acad Manag J. 2001;44(1):29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Van de Ven AH, Ganco M, Hinings CR. Returning to the Frontier of Contingency Theory of Organizational and Institutional designs. Acad Manage Annals. 2013;7(1):393–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vroom VH, Jago AG. The role of the situation in leadership. Am Psychol. 2007;62(1):17–24. discussion 43 – 7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Caulfield JL, Lee FK, Baird CA. Navigating the ethically complex and controversial world of college athletics: a humanistic leadership approach to student athlete well-being. J Bus Ethics. 2023;183(2):603–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang K, Wang Y, Tang N. Power distance orientation and perceived insider status in China: a social identity perspective. Asia Pac Bus Rev. 2023;29(1):89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Van Daalen G, Willemsen TM, Sanders K. Reducing work–family conflict through different sources of social support. J Vocat Behav. 2006;69(3):462–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ma JF, et al. Does ambidextrous leadership motivate work crafting? Int J Hospitality Manage. 2019;77:159–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Carlson DS, et al. Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68(1):131–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Löwe B, et al. A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2010;122(1–2):86–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yan J, et al. Hospitality workers’ COVID-19 risk perception and depression: a contingent model based on transactional theory of stress model. Int J Hospitality Manage. 2021;95:102935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang SX, Huang H, Wei F. Geographical distance to the epicenter of Covid-19 predicts the burnout of the working population: Ripple effect or typhoon eye effect? Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Mark G, Smith AP. Occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and the mental health of nurses. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17(3):505–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Noonan M, et al. A qualitative meta-synthesis: public health nurses role in the identification and management of perinatal mental health problems. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(3):545–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hanson GC, Hammer LB, Colton CL. Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. J Occup Health Psychol. 2006;11(3):249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cai Y, et al. Nurses’ work engagement: The influences of ambidextrous leadership, clinical nurse leadership and workload. J Adv Nurs; 2021.

  67. Fiedler FE. The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process, in advances in experimental social psychology. Elsevier; 1978. pp. 59–112.

  68. Sampaio F, Sequeira C, Teixeira L. Nurses’ mental health during the Covid-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study. J Occup Environ Med. 2020;62(10):783–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Galanis P, et al. Nurses’ burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(8):3286–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Ghislieri C, et al. Work-family conflict and enrichment in nurses: between job demands, perceived organisational support and work-family backlash. J Nurs Manag. 2017;25(1):65–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. van Dorssen-Boog P, et al. Self-leadership among healthcare workers: a mediator for the effects of job autonomy on work engagement and health. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Lapierre LM, et al. A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work-family enrichment. J Organizational Behav. 2018;39(4):385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Moura D, Orgambídez-Ramos A, de Jesus SN. Psychological empowerment and work engagement as predictors of work satisfaction: a sample of hotel employees. J Spat Organizational Dynamics. 2015;3(2):125–34.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Schön Persson S, et al. Resources for work-related well‐being: a qualitative study about healthcare employees’ experiences of relationships at work. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(23–24):4302–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(1):114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

NA.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 72102033]; Economic and Social Development Research Project of Liaoning Province [grant number 2024lslqnkt-017]; the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [grant numbers 2022T150101; 2021M700714].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China

    Jiaqi Yan

  2. Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin, China

    Yuefeng Lian

  3. School of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing, China

    Liangxing He

  4. Innovation & Entrepreneurship Research Center, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing, China

    Liangxing He

Authors
  1. Jiaqi Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuefeng Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liangxing He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jiaqi Yan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Project administration.Yuefeng Lian: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Project administration. Liangxing He: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuefeng Lian or Liangxing He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

I confirm the use of human tissue samples was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulation and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. I confirm that all experimental protocols were approved by Ethics Committee at School of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics (No. 2021-005). I also confirm that informed consent was obtained from all subject’’.

Consent to participant

We informed all the respondents that this study is only used by academic research and not used for any other purposes. All included respondents gave their oral and written informed consent. This study was supported by Ethics Committee at School of Business Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics (No. 2021-005).

Consent to publish

NA.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, J., Lian, Y. & He, L. Perceived ambidextrous leadership and nurses’ mental health: a work-family perspective. BMC Nurs 23, 504 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02090-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02090-w

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us