Skip to main content
Download PDF

Patient and visitor aggression de-escalation training for nurses in a teaching hospital in Cairo, Egypt

BMC Nursing volume 21, Article number: 63 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Workplace violence (WPV) has been recognized as a major occupational hazard worldwide. Healthcare professions are particularly at a higher risk of WPV. Patients and their relatives are commonly the most common perpetrators for WPV against physicians. Trainings on the universal precautions of violence, how to effectively anticipate, recognize and manage potentially violent situation is recommended by OSHA as a part of a written, effective, comprehensive, and interactive WPV prevention program.

Objective

To implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a training session delivered to nurses. The training session aimed to increase nurses’ ability to identify potentially violent situations and to effectively manage these situations in a teaching hospital in Egypt.

Methodology

A total of 99 nurses attended the training sessions. Confidence in coping with aggressive patient scale, along with nurses’ attitudes toward WPV, were used to assess the effectiveness of the training sessions.

Results

Nurses’ perceived confidence to deal with aggression increased after attending the training sessions. Nurses’ attitudes toward WPV positively changed after attending the training session.

Conclusion and recommendations

Increasing awareness of the problem among healthcare professions as well as the public is warranted. Violence prevention program with a zero-tolerance policy is warranted.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Violence in the workplace is the act or threat of violence directed toward persons at work or on duty, ranging from verbal abuse to physical violence [1]. WPV in the healthcare sector is a growing problem worldwide [2].

In 2002, a joint program conducted to investigate WPV against HCPs specifically in hospital wards, aiming to develop a framework for managing WPV in healthcare sector. In the program 2014 report, it stated that, through country case surveys in Thailand, South Africa, Portugal, Bulgaria, Brazil, and Lebanon, more than halfA of surveyed HCPs had experienced at least one incident of violence in the previous year, and that, there were no specific policies to prevent, nor to respond to WPV. This contributes to under-reporting of WPV incidents [3].

Previous literature showed that, WPV is a prevalent problem among HCPs worldwide, developed as well as developing countries [4,5,6,7]. Previous literature showed that, WPV is a prevalent problem among HCPs in Arab countries as well [8,9,10,11,12]. In Egypt, previous studies showed that WPV is a major problem against HCPs in hospitals [13,14,15,16,17]. As well as among nursing students as well [18]. Visitors, as well as patients themselves were the most common perpetrators of on job violence against HCPs [4, 9, 12, 15,16,17]. Miscommunication between patient and doctor are commonly the cause of escalating into violent incidents [19]. Moreover, only half of on job violence victims reported the incident. Half of the participants described reporting as ineffective, two thirds of the participants were even aware that a WPV reporting system existed in ASUHs [15].

HCPs exposed to WPV suffer from emotional consequences. Victims of WPV report feeling hurt, feared, ashamed, angry, powerless, shock, embarrassed and intimidated. These emotional consequences lead to re-victimization and negative self-evaluation [10, 20]. WPV is considered an important cause of post-traumatic stress disorder among HCPs. Up to 70% of WPV victims reported symptoms of PTSD [3]. Not only has WPV against HCPs, negative impact on psychological and physical well-being of HCPs, but also affects their job motivation, consequently compromising quality of healthcare, and putting healthcare provision at risk. WPV also leads to enormous financial loss in the health sector [21]. Nurses who experienced WPV were more likely to consider quitting their jobs (OR = 3.9; CI 1.8–8.3) [10].

The potential for WPV can be minimized if effective prevention procedures are adopted within the organization. The threat of WPV can be reduced if potentially aggressive behavior is reported and/ or identified as early as possible, and effectively dealt with [22].

Patients’ violence against HCPs is usually recognized as unintentional, which may contribute to underreporting and even acceptance of WPV [23].

Previous literature shows that WPV against HCPs is a prevalent problem. Visitors, as well as patients themselves were the most common perpetrators [9].

Hospitals are perceived as a stressful environment by patients and visitors. This leads patients to react aggressively. understanding trauma, neuroscience of threat and safety can help HCPs in understanding patients’ aggression and develop strategies to better cope with it [24]. Breaking bad news is a common volatile situation that is potentially violence and require certain skills and approach to communicate and prevent its escalation into violence against HCPs [25].

Trainings on the universal precautions of violence, how to effectively anticipate, recognize and manage potentially violent situation is recommended by OSHA as a part of a written, effective, comprehensive, and interactive WPV prevention program [26]. Previous studies assessed the effectiveness of aggression de-escalation training program and reported a statistically significate difference in participants confidence to deal with aggression after attending the training program [27, 28].

Giving the importance of WPV in healthcare sector and its consequences, not only on the HCPs, but also on the quality of health services [21]. This study aimed to implement and study the effectiveness of a training session delivered to nurses. The training session aimed to increase nurses’ ability to identify potentially violent situations and to effectively manage these situations in a teaching hospital in Egypt.

Subjects and methods

Study design

An Intervention Study (One-Group Quasi-Experimental Longitudinal Pretest/Posttest Design).

Study settings

The study was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals (ASUHs), one of the largest tertiary teaching institutions in Cairo, which provide health services to patient from all over Egypt, with an average of 775,000 medical visits annually 2300 medical bed [29].

Study population and recruitment

Nurses attending in the wards in all main hospitals in ASUHs which specialized in internal medicine, surgery, pediatric, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cardiothoracic surgery hospital and Oncology department Hospital. All nurses working in the wards in in ASUHs, agreed to participate in the study were eligible. Recruited nurses attended a training on workplace violence aiming to empower them with skills needed to effectively identify and manage workplace violence.

The training was proposed to the ASUHs administration. Announcements of the training session dates were sent ahead to nurses working in wards in all departments in ASUHs. Training sessions’ attendance was organized internally in the wards according to the workload in coordination with the training and quality units in ASUHs. A total of 10 training sessions were conducted from January 2018, till August 2018.

Sampling method

A Convenience non-random sampling method was used.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated based on the effect size concept, in our case it would be the paired difference in (Confidence in Coping with Patient Aggression CCPA scale), divided by the standard deviation of the difference. With a small to medium effect size of 0.4, level of significance of 0.05, power of 0.80 and using two sided Wilcoxon signed rank test [27], a sample size of 60 nurses was satisfactory. The calculations were done using G*Power 3.1.9.2 software.

Of all nurses who attended the training sessions, a total of 99 nurses agreed to participate in the study and completed the pretest/posttest surveys, only 65 of them were reachable and completed a one-month follow up survey.

The intervention

Training curriculum: universal precautions for WPV in healthcare sector [26, 30, 31]

An evidence based two-hour training session for nurses working in ASUHs was tailored and conducted. An occupational medicine specialist and a psychiatrist specialist extensively reviewed and revised the training material, to ensure that the training materials met the requirements.

The training session aimed to 1- Improve nurses’ ability to identify potentially violent situations, 2- Provide nurses with the needed skills to effectively de-escalate a violent situation. The training was a multimedia two-hour session attended once. The training session included the following:

  • Introduction: definition of WPV, types of WPV and magnitude of WPV in healthcare sector worldwide.

  • Components of an effective and comprehensive violence prevention program and the importance of training.

  • OSHA Universal precautions for job violence against HCPs: that the assault is usually Predictable and Preventable, and that it is important to recognize escalation and intervene immediately.

  • What motivates the attacks? Causes of patient/visitor violence against HCPs in hospitals.

  • Warning symptoms that the situation is potentially violent.

  • Techniques to de-escalate a potentially violent situation: Resolution Strategies for Aggressive Patients

Study tools

Evaluating the skill-based outcomes that the nurses would acquire from attending the training sessions was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the training session. The following surveys were used:

  1. I.

    Confidence in Coping with Patient Aggression scale (CCPA scale) [32]: CCPA scale is a one-direction construct scale. It consists of 10-items, which reflects self-confidence to deal with physical and psychological aggression, where higher scores indicate more confidence in managing aggressive behavior.

  2. II.

    Nurses’ Attitudes toward violence\aggressive behavior questionnaire [33, 34]: a questionnaire of nurses’ attitudes toward WPV was used to measure the effectiveness of the training session. The questionnaire consisted of 7 statements with a five-point Likert scale response. Higher scores indicated favorable attitudes. Nurses’ responses in the 7 attitudes statement were summed into a total attitude score.

CCPA scale and Nurses’ attitudes toward violence questionnaire were a self-administered surveys and were measured 3 times: a baseline at the beginning of the training session (pretest), immediately at the end of the training (posttest), and a one-month after attending the training session (one month follow up). Nurses’ responses were calculated and individual matching and comparisons between pretest, posttest and follow up was done.

Tools validity

Both surveys were originally in English language and were translated into Arabic language and back translated into English language by an external reviewer. A comparison of the two languages versions was done, to confirm accuracy of the translation process and validity of the scale.

The Original CCPA scale showed a high degree of internal consistency and precision (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92), reflecting the inter-correlation between CCPA scale items [13]. Cronbach’s alpha was measured based on nurses’ responses in our study, and it showed, similar to the original scale, a high degree of internal consistency and precision (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88).

Data management and analysis

The collected data was revised, coded, tabulated, and analyzed using Statistical package for Social Science (SPSS 25 for windows). ANOVA was used to compare individual nurses’ response between baseline, immediately after training, and follow up (one-month). Post hock test was used to identify the pairwise difference. Reported p-values were adjusted “Bonferroni adjustment” was applied. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparison of nurses’ responses in attitudes toward violence between baseline, immediately after training and follow up (one-month) were analyzed as; 1- Quantitative scores using repeated measures one-way ANOVA, using post hock test to identify the pairwise difference. 2- Qualitative ordinal variable using test of marginal homogeneity to compare between paired scores. Bonferroni Adjustment for multiple comparisons was applied on reported results, there for results were considered statistically significant at a p value < 0.017. Both methods yield the same results. To avoid repetition, only analysis using test of marginal homogeneity is displayed.

Results

A total of 99 nurses completed the pretest and posttest. Only 65 of them were reachable for a follow up and completed a one-month follow up survey. Nurses mean age was 39.9 ± 8.2 year. Most of nurses attended the training session were female (93.9%). Most of nurses were married (80.8%), only 10.1% were singles. There was no statistically significant difference in confidence in coping with aggressive behavior, and attitude toward aggression score, regarding age, years of experience, nor gender.

There was a significant effect of attending the training session on nurses’ perceived confidence with dealing with aggressive patients (F = 90.01, p < 0.001), with medium effect size (partial eta squared = 0.58). Bonferroni post hoc test showed that, nurses attended the training course had a higher posttest and one-month follow up scores, compared to their pretest score (Mean ± SD: 70.4 ± 22.7, 68.1 ± 16.7 and 39.8 ± 20.7 respectively). Differences between pretest and posttest, and between pretest and one- month follow up were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) respectively. There was a statistically significant effect of attending the training session on the nurses’ “Attitudes toward violence / aggressive behavior questionnaire score” (F = 49.62, p < 0.001), with a moderate effect size (partial eta squared = 0.437). Bonferroni post hoc test showed that, nurses attended the training course had a higher posttest and one-month follow up scores, compared to their pretest score (Mean ± SD: 31.1 ± 3.4, 31.5 ± 2.9 and 27.0 ± 3.2 respectively). Differences between pretest and posttest, and between pretest and one- month follow up were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) respectively.

Nurses’ posttest and one-month follow up scores in “comfortability for working with an aggressive patient” were higher, compared to their pretest score, difference between pretest/posttest, and between pretest/one- month follow up were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001) respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Nurses’ perceived confidence in coping with aggressive behavior scale items (n = 65)
Full size table

One fourth of nurses strongly agreed that violence can be anticipated and recognized in pretest, compared to 47.5% of nurses in posttest, and 61.5% in follow up, pretest/posttest and pretest/follow up differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively).

One third of nurses disagreed in pretest that “physical violence is part of the job”, compared to 51.5% and 70.8% of nurses immediately posttest and one-month follow up respectively. Test of marginal homogeneity was statistically significant for pretest/posttest and pretest/follow up (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively) (Table 2).

Table 2 Nurses’ Attitudes toward violence \ aggressive behavior questionnaire items
Full size table

Discussion

The current study aimed to implement and study the effectiveness of an evidence-based training for nurses designed to improve their ability to identify patient/visitor violence, to effectively manage and to de-escalate potentially violent situations in ASUHs. To our knowledge, the current study is the first study of its kind in Egypt. Breaking bad news is a common volatile situation that is potentially violence and require certain skills and approach to communicate and prevent its escalation into violence against HCPs [25]. This highlights the importance of conducting this training.

Our study results are consistent with the findings of previous studies, which conducted trainings to provide nurses with the skills needed to de-escalate aggressive patients. Previous studies reported a statistically significant difference in the attendees’ CCPA scale total score between the baseline and the immediate posttest scores [27, 28, 35,36,37]. It was noted that none of the previous studies reported the effect size of attending the program [27, 28, 35, 36].

It was noted that, our participants showed low pertest confidence scores (Mean ± SD: 39.8 ± 20.7) compared to Story et al., where participant nurses scored higher in pretest (Mean ± SD: 55.1 ± 5.18). Post-test scores were more similar (Mean ± SD: 75.8 ± 4.56) in Story et al. study compared to (Mean ± SD: 70.4 ± 22.7 and 68.1 ± 16.7 post-test and follow up respectively in our study. This difference highlights the importance of conducting trainings to improve HCPs ability to manage patient/visitor violence in Egypt [37].

Nurses retained their confidence to deal with aggression after attending the training course in follow up assessment, which was one month after attending the training session. Consistent with Nau et al., 2009, in which follow up assessment was after 2 weeks of nursing students’ practical placement, which was nearly 4–8 weeks after attending the training program [27].

A study explored gender differences in aggression perception among of medical students, after attending a training on violence management, found that men initially perceived aggression as a less destructive, yet attending the training diminished the difference in aggression perception between male and females [38].

There was a positive change in nurses’ belief that “it is better to intervene early in de-escalating an aggressive patient after attending the training session” (test of marginal homogeneity, p < 0.001 for both pretest/ posttest and pretest/follow up). Consistent with Beech, 2001, who reported a statistically significant positive difference in nurses’ attitude after attending the training session (p = 0.019).

One of the objectives of the training session was to emphasis that, although it is important for HCPs to acquire skills needed to de-escalate aggressive situations, yet patient/visitor aggression against HCPs is not accepted, and it is not part of the job. Nurses’ attitudes changed positively after attending the session; nurses became more assertive that verbal abuse is not accepted in the workplace (test of marginal homogeneity, p < 0.001 for both pretest/ posttest and pretest/follow up). Nurses became more assertive that physical violence in the workplace is not accepted (Test of marginal homogeneity, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.043 for pretest/ posttest, pretest/follow up, posttest/follow up respectively). Beech, 2001, did not find a statistically significant difference in nurses’ attitude toward accepting WPV after attending the training [34].

Limitations

Reported effectiveness of the training is based on a self-perceived change in nurses’ confidence. Comparing reported incidence of WPV before and after implementing the training was not applicable, as WPV is usually underreported.

Conclusion

The study found that, attending a training session on aggression management, increased nurses’ perceived confidence to deal with aggressive situation, and positively influenced nurses’ attitude toward WPV in healthcare sector.

Recommendations

This study showed that communication skills training is important in managing and diffusing a potentially violent situation. More care showed be given to communication skills curriculum and the universal precautions for violence, in medical education, as well as a continuous on job training is warranted. Violence prevention training is needed combined with a comprehensive violence management policy, combined with engineering measures and administration commitment, to prevent WPV in healthcare sector. More studies on evaluating the effect of HCPs’ mental and emotional well‐being on WPV is warranted.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due privacy reasons. But are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Occupational Violence. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/violence/default.html website last accessed in January 2020.

  2. Prevention and management of workplace violence position statement. International Council of Nurses (ICN). 2017. http://www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/publications/position_statements/ICN_PS_Prevention_and_management_of_workplace_violence.pdf (website last accessed January 2020).

  3. Martino V. D., Workplace violence in the health sector - Country case studies (Brazil, Bulgaria, Lebanon, Portugal, South Africa, Thailand, and an additional Australian study), Synthesis report, ILO, WHO, ICN. 2002. research report http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/release37/en/ (website last accessed July 2021)

  4. Pinar T, Acikel C, Pinar G, Karabulut E, Saygun M, Bariskin E, Guidotti TL, Akdur R, Sabuncu H, Bodur S, Egri M, Bakir B, Acikgoz EM, Atceken I, Cengiz M. Workplace violence in the health sector in Turkey: a national study. J Interpers Violence. 2017;32(15):2345–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515591976 Epub 2015 Jun 28 PMID: 26124224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly EL, Sub IA, M., Fulginiti A., Brekke J. S., and Novaco R. W. A cross-sectional survey of factors related to inpatient assault of staff in a forensic psychiatric hospital. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(5):1110–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Antão HS, Sacadura-Leite E, Manzano MJ, Pinote S, Relvas R, Serranheira F, Sousa-Uva A. workplace violence in healthcare: a single-center study on causes, consequences and prevention strategies. Acta Med Port. 2020;33(1):31–7. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.11465 Epub 2020 Jan 3 PMID: 31928601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaikh S, Baig LA, Hashmi I, et al. The magnitude and determinants of violence against healthcare workers in Pakistan. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5: e002112. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Alsmael MM, Gorab AH, AlQahtani AM. Violence against healthcare workers at primary care centers in Dammam and Al Khobar Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med. 2020;13:667–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alharthy N, Al Mutairi M, Alsahli A, Alshehri A, Almatrafi A, Mahah A, Alswailem KA, Philip W, Qureshi S. Workplace violence among emergency medical services workers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Hosp Adm. 2017;6(3):26. https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v6n3p26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alameddine M, Mourad Y, Dimassi H. A national study on nurses’ exposure to occupational violence in Lebanon: prevalence, consequences and associated factors. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137105.PMID:26355686;PMCID:PMC4565636.

  11. Al-Omari H. Physical and verbal workplace violence against nurses in Jordan. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62:111–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed AS. Verbal and physical abuse against Jordanian nurses in the work environment. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(4):318–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakr YA, Abd-El Fattah YM, Ahmed YM, Abdelhafez AM. Violence against physicians and nurses in a University Hospital’s Emergency Departments in Egypt: a cross - sectional study. Med Integ Stud Res J. 2019;2(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdellah RF, Salama KM. Prevalence and risk factors of workplace violence against health care workers in emergency department in Ismailia. Egypt Pan Afr Med J. 2017;17(26):21. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.26.21.10837.PMID:28451000;PMCID:PMC5398248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mostafa NS, Alhosini DM. Work-related assaults on health care workers in an Egyptian tertiary hospital. Egypt J Community Med. 2013;31(4):41–54. https://doi.org/10.12816/0011925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Samir N, Mohamed R, Moustafa E, Abou Saif H. Nurses’ attitudes and reactions to workplace violence in obstetrics and gynecology departments in Cairo Hospitals. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(3):198–204 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/1182952012.

  17. Abbas MAF, Fiala LA, Abdel Rahman AGA, Fahim AE. Epidemiology of workplace violence against nursing staff in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2010;85(2-Jan):29–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim E. M. and Madian A. A. (2012). Workplace Violence as Provocation for Nursing Profession, Damanhour University, http://damanhour.edu.eg/pdf/178/2-violence (1).pdf. Website last accessed July 2019.

  19. Saeedi M, Al-Othman N, Rabayaa M. Breaching the bridge: an investigation into doctor-patient miscommunication as a significant factor in the violence against healthcare workers in Palestine. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:7130. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9994872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kisa S. Turkish nurses’ experiences of verbal abuse at work. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2008;22(4):200–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2007.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Violence against health workers. World Health Organization (WHO). 2017. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/workplace/en/Website last accessed July 2019.

  22. Holbrook CM, Bixler DE, Rugala EA, Casteel C. Workplace Violence. Issues in Threat Management. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Workplace violence in healthcare: understanding the challenge. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2015. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3826.pdf Website last accessed July 2019.

  24. Beattie J, Griffiths D, Innes K, Morphet J. Workplace violence perpetrated by clients of health care: a need for safety and trauma- informed care. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28:116–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baig L, Tanzil S, Ali SK, Shaikh S, Jamali S, Khan M. Breaking bad news: a contextual model for Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;34(6):1336–40. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.346.15663 PMID: 30559781; PMCID: PMC6290194. 2018 Nov-Dec.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Healthcare and Social Service Workers. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2016. https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hospitals/workplace_violence.html. Website last checked October 2019.

  27. Nau J, Dassen T, Needham I, Halfens R. The development and testing of a training course in aggression for nursing students: a pre- and posttest study. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29(2):196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baig L, Tanzil S, Shaikh S, Hashmi I, Khan MA, Polkowski M. Effectiveness of training on de-escalation of violence and management of aggressive behavior faced by health care providers in public sector hospitals of Karachi. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;34(2):294–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ain Shams University Hospitals (ASUHs). (2020). Official website, website last checked in February 2020.http://hospitals.asu.edu.eg//english/article.php?action=show&id=113#.Xj_zo3duImc.

  30. Violence, occupational hazards in hospitals, workplace safety and health. Department of health and human services National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Publication No. 2002–101. 2002. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002–101/pdfs/2002101.pdf?id=https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHB002101. Website last accessed September 2019.

  31. Occupational violence: workplace violence, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2019). Page last reviewed: October 3, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/violence/default.html. Website last accessed January 2020.

  32. Thackrey M. Clinician confidence in coping with patient aggression: assessment and enhancement. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1987;18(1):57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Collins J. Nurses’ attitudes towards aggressive behavior, following attendance at “the prevention and management of aggressive behavior programme.” J Adv Nurs. 1994;20(1):117–31.

  34. Beech B. Sign of the times or the shape of things to come? A 3-day unit of instruction on ‘aggression and violence in health settings for all students during pre-registration nurse training.’ Accid Emerg Nurs. 2001;9:204–11.

  35. Grenyer B, Ilkiw-Lavalle O, Biro P, Middleby-Clements J, Comninos A, Coleman M. Safer at work: development and evaluation of an aggression and violence minimization program. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004;38(10):804–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Allen D, Tynan H. Responding to aggression behavior: impact of training on staff members’ knowledge and confidence. J Ment Retard. 2000;38(2):97–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Story AR, Harris R, Scott SD, Vogelsmeier A. An evaluation of nursesʼ perception and confidence after implementing a workplace aggression and violence prevention training program. J Nurs Adm. 2020;50(4):209–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lickiewicz J, Jagielski P, Hughes PP, Makara-Studzińska M. The gender-related impact of a violence management training program on medical school students—preliminary results. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(19):7130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197130.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable

Funding

This project was funded through a training grant from the Fogarty International Center of US National Institution of Health, Grant 5D43TW007296. The funder had no other role in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Community, Environmental and Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, a national university in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt

    Dena Ali Abozaid, Mohamed Momen, Nahla Fawzy Abou El Ezz, Mahi Mahmoud Al-Tehewy, Maged El-Setouhy & Moustafa El Houssinie

  2. Community Health Department, Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Hanaa Abdelhakiem Ahmed

  3. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Maged El-Setouhy

  4. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Mohamed El-Shinawi

  5. Vice president, Galala University, Suez, Egypt

    Mohamed El-Shinawi

  6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Jon Mark Hirshon

Authors
  1. Dena Ali Abozaid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Momen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nahla Fawzy Abou El Ezz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hanaa Abdelhakiem Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mahi Mahmoud Al-Tehewy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maged El-Setouhy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mohamed El-Shinawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jon Mark Hirshon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Moustafa El Houssinie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Each author has substantively read, revised, and approved the submitted version. Abozaid DA, El-Setouhy M, El-Shinawi M, Hirshon JM, and El Houssinie M have made substantial contributions in developing the research proposal and designing the work. Abozaid DA, Ahmed HA, Al-Tehewy MM, and Houssinie M have made substantial contributions to the development and revision of the training session curriculum, as well as data acquisition. Abozaid DA, and El Houssinie M have contributed to the analysis, and the interpretation of data. Momen M and Abou El Ezz NF have made substantial contributions to drafting the work and substantively revised it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dena Ali Abozaid.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

A written informed consent was obtained from the study participants. Confidentiality and privacy of the participants’ information was assured. Approval of the ethical committee in Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University was obtained. The research proposal was also reviewed and approved by the University of Maryland, Baltimore Institutional Review Board. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Administrative approvals from ASUHs were obtained.

Consent for publication

Study participants were informed that the collected data are for research purposes and will be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abozaid, D.A., Momen, M., Ezz, N.F.A.E. et al. Patient and visitor aggression de-escalation training for nurses in a teaching hospital in Cairo, Egypt. BMC Nurs 21, 63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00828-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00828-y

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us