Skip to main content
Download PDF

Working environment of nurses in public referral hospitals of West Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021

BMC Nursing volume 21, Article number: 167 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Healthy working environment for nurses is a foundation for promoting patients’ and nurses’ safety in hospitals. However, in Ethiopia, there is scarcity of data on this issue. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the working environment of nurses in Public Referral Hospitals in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2021.

Methods

An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted among 423 nurses from January to February 2021. Systematic random sampling was used to select nurses from each hospital. Structured, self-administered questionnaires were used to collect the data. EPI- DATA and SPSS were used for data entry and analysis respectively. Frequency, percentages, and means were calculated. Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index tool was used to measure the outcome variable. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were computed to identify associated factors. Finally, texts, tables and graphs were used to report findings.

Results

The response rate for the study was 96.2%. Around 210 (51.6%) of the study participants were male. One hundred eighty eight (46.2%) nurses reported that their working environment was healthy, while 219 (53.8%,) reported it as not healthy. Nurses who were working in pediatrics wards (AOR = 0.13, 0.02, 0.1) and nurses who gave care for 7–12 patients per day (AOR = 0.21, 0.05, 0.98) were less likely to have a healthy working environment, respectively. Nurses who reported the Ministry of Health to give focus to the nursing profession were 73% more likely to have a healthy work environment (AOR = 0.27; 0.09, .82).

Conclusion

and recommendations.

More than half of nurses reported that their working environment was not healthy to appropriate practice. Hence, introducing systems to improve participation of nurses in hospital affairs and patient care is essential. It is also important to give attention to nurses who are working at pediatrics wards, and for nurses who give care more than the standards.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Nursing work environment is defined as an organizational feature that helps the nurses to engage in the work processes or limit professional nursing practice one or the other way [1,2,3]. The World Health Organization defines it as an environment where workers and managers collaborate to achieve sustainable protection of patients and workers way [4]. In order to realize the nurses’ potential to lead quality care and perform to the best of their abilities, they must operate in a healthy work environment that is safe, empowering, and satisfying [3]. In addition, working in a healthy environment is an important professional right for nurses that allows them to act in accordance with professional standards, legally authorized scopes of practice, and code of ethics [5]. The nursing working environment is too complex and characterized by: nursing involvement in hospital affairs, the basis of nursing quality, the ability, leadership and support of nurse managers, adequate staffing and resources and good professional relationships, a balanced work schedule, adequate time to meet patients’ needs and professional advancements options [1, 6, 7]. Studies reported that a positive work environment is associated with fewer occupational injuries, less burnout, and increased job satisfaction [8, 9]. It impacts the nurses’ caring behavior and loyalty to the organization [10], and resource adequacy which shows a negative effect on caring behavior and helps to improve the overall quality of nursing care [1].

Although, the nature of the work environment varies across institutional settings [11], nurses often assess their work environment as stressful and complex while meeting the physical and psychological needs of patients [8]. Nursing is inseparably linked to patient safety and poor working conditions for nurses and inadequate nurse staffing levels increase the risk for errors such as risk of health- care-associated infections and occupational injuries [12].

In a study of 12 countries in Europe showed that nurse had a concern regarding their workforce management and adequate resources, and nurses reported that important nursing tasks were often left undone because of lack of time [13]. In another study in Turkish hospital showed that, control of nursing practice’, ‘middle management accountability’ and ‘quality initiatives’ had the highest mean scores [3]. But, a single study in Ethiopia reported that the nursing environment and management was unfavorable to assure quality care [14]. In another study in Ethiopia, more 54% of the respondents had low perception to their work environment [15]. In Peru and Mexico organizational factors like resource and infrastructure deficit, work overload, job performance evaluations the working condition affect [16]. In another, cross sectional study in Shenzhen, china reported that the practice environment of nurses was satisfactory[1].

Nurses are the largest group of employees in hospitals that deliver most bedside patient care [17, 18]. It is clear that a good working environment is important in achieving patient and employee safety, and nurses can only render quality services if their work environment provides conditions that support them. However, there is limited evidence specifically on nurses’ working condition until this study. Yet, non-conducive working environments and the risks involved in these conditions cause nurses to become distracted and alienated from their profession and even leave. Considering this, undoubtedly nurses should have a positive work environment that supports superior performance and attracts them to the profession. But, before forwarding suggestions, establishing standards, and approaches, it would seem necessary to conduct a research aimed at assessing working conditions of nurses in Public Referral Hospitals of Amhara Regional State. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the working environment of nurses and associated factors in Public Referral Hospitals in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2021.

Methods

Study settings and period

This study was conducted in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia from January to February 2021. The regional state contains; 28 million population in mid – 2018 and it has 14 Zones, three- city administrations, and 180 woredas (139 rural and 41 urban [19]. It also has 80 hospitals (8 referrals, 2 general, and 73 primaries), 847 health centers, and 3,342 health posts [20]. Despite the increased number of health facilities, shortages of skilled health personnel, medical equipment, drugs, and medical supplies, inefficient and inequitable use of health resources are the challenges of the region [21]. There are eight referral hospitals in Amhara regional state. Among them five of them (Debremarkos referral hospital, Tibebe Gion referral hospital, Felege Hiwot referral Hospital, Debre Tabor Referral Hospital and University of Gondar referral Hospital) were located in the north west part of the region where this study was conducted. Considering the resources, the University of Gondar (financial funders of this study) suggested to focus on hospitals located in the northwest part of the region. As a result, we included all the five hospitals in the study.

Study design and population

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among nurses who were working in Public Referral Hospitals in Amhara region. The source population were all nurses working in each hospital. All permanently employed nurses with work experience of equal or greater six months during and working the time of study, and who agreed to participate in the study were included.

Sample size, sampling technique and procedures

To calculate the sample size, we considered the working condition as 50% and with an alpha error of 5%, a power of 95% and 10% of non-response rate. Then, 423 sample sizes were required for the study. Currently, there are five referral hospitals in West Amhara regional state from which samples were selected. For each hospital, the total sample size was allocated proportionally based on the number of nurses they had. Then, systematic random sampling was used to select nurses from each hospital. Then, the samples were taken from each working unit as per the sampling frame.

Study variables

The dependent variable of the study was working environment. Age, sex, marital status, education status, position at work, professional experience,, working unit, salary, patient nurse ratio, working shift, hours worked, autonomy, flexibility schedule, participation in decision making, relationships with physicians, recognition of work, professional advancement opportunity, professional identification, satisfaction with salary were the explanatory variables.

Operational definition

Nurses working environment

Composite score was computed and nursing work environment was classified as healthy if the participants scored mean and above, and not healthy if they scored below the mean [14].

Data collection tools, measurements and procedures

The data were collected using self-administered English version questionnaires which were adapted from validated and standardized existing tools. The tools have two sections. Part-I: Socio-demographic and professional-related characteristics of nurses, and Part-II: working environment of nurses measurement scales.

The working environment was measured by the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index [22] and which was validated in Spanish with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.90 [23]. The scale was a five-point Likert scale (5 = Strongly Agree, 4 = agree; 3 = neutral; 2 = disagree, and 1 = strongly disagree) which consisted of 32 items. Nurses indicated the degree, according to what had been presented in each item in their work. In this study the scale has an item reliability of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.92 and has five outcome subscales (nurse participation in hospital affairs -α = 0.87, nursing involvement for quality of care-α = 0.83, nurse manager ability-α = 0.8, leadership and support of nurses, staffing and resource adequacy-α = 0.76 and collegial nurse-physician relationships-α = 0.89).

The overall Practice Environment Composite score was calculated from the average of subscale scores. Then, the mean score was used to classify the working environment of nurses in to two groups (conducive and non-conducive). Respondents who scored mean (98.3 ± 18.4) and above the mean score were classified as conducive, while those who scored less than the mean score were classified as non-conducive nursing environments.

Data management and analysis

EPI- DATA 3.1 [24] was used for data entry and SPSS version-23 software [25] for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were made using statistical measurements. Frequency, percentages, means, and standard deviations were calculated. The outcome variable was categorized as conducive and non-conducive environment. Normality tests were performed using the normal Q-Q graph and the Kolmogorov- Smirnov goodness adjustment test and Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index admit the normal model. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were computed to identify associated factors. Finally, texts, tables and graphs were used to report findings.

Quality assurance mechanisms

Before collecting the data, the face and content validity of the data collection tool was assured, checked by inviting experts in the field. The data collectors and supervisors were trained about the study purpose, and protocol. The research data collection tool was piloted (pre-tested) to check the fitness of the tool for the study settings and necessary corrections were made. The investigators exchanged all the necessary information regarding the data collection procedures with the supervisors on the daily basis. Furthermore, the respondents had been given brief information sheets to read before the filling in the questionnaires, and supervision was also done at the spot by the supervisors. In addition, detailed feedback was provided to the data collectors. The collected data were coded per operational definitions of the study variables and cheek-rechecked by the principal investigators for its completeness [26].

Results

Socio-demographic and professional related characteristics of nurses

Of the 423 study participants, 407 nurses responded to the questions fully that gave the response rate of 96.2%. The age of the nurses ranged from 20–65 years (mean: 31.67 ± 5.8). In terms of gender and marital status, most of the participants were male 210 (51.6%) and married 270 (66.3%) respectively. A higher proportion of the participants, 358 (88%) were degree holders. More than half of the nurses 205 (50.4%) had 5–10 years of professional experience. Around, 189(46.4%) nurses are members of professional associations. Of which 135 (33.2% were members of the Ethiopian nursing association. The majority, 316 (77.6%) of them were not satisfied with their current salary. (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic and professional related characteristics of nurses in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 407)
Full size table

The working environment of nurses

Composite score and mean for each sub-scale and the total working environment of nurses were calculated. Accordingly, a higher mean score (33.4 ± 6.3) was observed in nursing involvement for quality of care in the hospital. More than half the participants perceived that the working environment was not conducive in terms of nurse participation in hospital affairs, 208 (51.1%) and nursing involvement for quality of care, 204 (50.1%). (Table 2).

Table 2 Nurses’ perception on working environment sub-scales in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 407)
Full size table

The overall composite mean score for the working environment was 98.3 ± 18.4. Around 188 (46.2%, CI: 41.5%- 51.4%) perceived that their working environment was healthy, while 219 (53.8%, CI: 48.6%-58.5%) perceived it as not healthy. (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Nurses’ perception on their working environment in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 407)

Full size image

Factors associated the nurses’ working environment

Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to see the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable. In the bivariate analysis age category from > 40 years, work experience of 5–10 years, working in chronic outpatient department, caring <  = 6 patients per day, being a members of professional association, having professional identification/batch in the hospital, being satisfied with the current salary, having a future vision to the nursing profession development, focus of ministry of health to the nursing profession were significant factors for working environment of nurse.

While working in pediatrics ward, caring 7–12 patients per day and focus of ministry of health to the nursing profession were significant factors in the multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Nurses who were working in pediatrics ward were 87% more likely to have not healthy working environment as compared to their counter parts (AOR = 0.13, 0.02, 0.1). Nurses who gave care for 7–12 patients per day had 79% less likely to have healthy environment as compared to those nursing giving care > 12 patients(AOR = 0.21, 0.05, 0.98). Nurses who perceived as ministry of health give focus to the nursing profession were 73% more likely to have healthy environment than their counter parts (AOR = 0.27, 0.09, 0.82) (Table 3).

Table 3 Factors associated with Nurses’ perception on working environment sub-scales in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2021 (N = 407)
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, 46% (CI: 41.5%- 51.4%) of nurses perceived that their working environmental was healthy while around 54% (CI: 48.6%-58.5%) nurses perceived that their working environment was not healthy, especially in terms of nurse participation in hospital affairs (51.1%) and nursing involvement for quality of care (50.1%). Working in pediatrics ward, caring for 7–12 patients per day, focus of Ministry of health to the nursing profession were significant factors for working environment of nurses.

This study revealed that more than half (54%) of the nurses perceived that their working environment was not healthy. This indicates that the importance of developing nursing related work policies and procedures like nursing involvement in quality care, adequate staffing and collegial relations [27, 28]. This helps the nurse to carry out tasks efficiently to ensure that clients receive quality healthcare services [18]. The finding is higher than a study conducted in Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia [15]. This percentage is not consistent with the study conducted in five tertiary general hospitals in Shenzhen, China where majority of nurses reported that the practice environmental of nurses was satisfactory [1]. This difference might be due to the fact that in china new nurses’ standardization training program was introduced to improve nursing services and quality of nursing cares. But, this finding is consistent with a qualitative study finding in united kingdom where participants expressed worries over their workplace environment [29]. This finding supports the finding in a study conducted 12 countries in Europe where nurse had concerns with workforce management and adequate resources, and reported that important nursing tasks were often left undone because of lack of time [13].

Nurses who gave care for 7–12 patients per day had 79% less likely to have healthy environment as compared to those nursing giving care > 12 patients. This finding is consistent with a qualitative study conducted in Peru and Mexico where nurses reported experiencing work overload and having an excessive number of patients [16]. It also supports a study finding in Dutch where nurses stated that the number of nurses available influences how patients experience the quality of care [30].

Nurses who perceived as ministry of health give focus to the nursing profession were 87% more likely to have healthy environment than their counter parts (AOR = 0.27, 0.09, 0.82). This finding supports the ideas that leadership had an impact on the work environment of nurses [31]. It also support the fact that the use of a transformational leadership style can foster the autonomy and empowerment of nurses to cultivate a positive work environment [32].

Limitation of the study

The interpretation of this finding should account the following limitations. The finding is based on the nurses self-report of their working environment. Hence, it would over/under report the findings. As the study is quantitative study, it might not reflect the exact perception of nurses’ view in their work environment.

Conclusion and recommendations

More than half nurses reported that their working environment is not-healthy for appropriate practice especially in terms of nurse participation in hospital affairs and nursing involvement for quality of care. Working in pediatrics ward, caring 7–12 patients per day, focus of ministry of health to the nursing profession were significant factors for working environment of nurses.

Hence, introducing systems to improve participation of nurses in hospital affairs and patient care is essential. It is also important to give attention to nurses who are working at pediatrics ward, and for nurses who give care more that the standards.

Availability of data and materials

The data set generated in this study will be available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

COR:

Crude Odds Ratio

References

  1. Wenjuan Lai, Rongxiu Jin, Ruoying He XD. Current situation and influencing factors of nursing practice environment in five tertiary general hospitals in Shenzhen: a cross sectional study. J Public Heal From Theory Pract. 2021.

  2. Stalpers D, De BBJM, Kaljouw MJ, Schuurmans MJ. Associations between characteristics of the nurse work environment and five nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in hospitals: A systematic review of literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(4):817–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Er F, Sökmen S. Investigation of the working conditions of nurses in public hospitals on the basis of nurse-friendly hospital criteria. Int J Nurs Sci J. 2018;5:206–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burton J. WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model:Background and Supporting Literature and Practices. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ANA. American Nurses’ Association Bill of Rights for Registered Nurses. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jean B, Connor A, Ziniel SI, Porter C, Doherty D, Moonan M, et al. interprofessional use and validation of the AACN health work environment assessment tool. Am J Crit CARE. 2018;27(5):363–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bae S. Assessing the relationships between nurse working conditions and patient outcomes : systematic literature review. J Nurs Manag. 2011;19:700–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Copanitsanou P, Fotos N, Brokalaki H. Effects of work environment on patient and nurse outcomes. Br J Nurs. 2017;26(3):172–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manuscript A. The relationship between hospital work environment and nurse outcomes in Guangdong, China: a nurse questionnaire survey. 2013;21:1476–85.

  10. JJohari FS, Omar R. Exploring Factors Impacting on Psychological Well-Being of Health Care Workers. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2019;9(2):5672–84.

  11. Aeschbacher R. Institutional effects on nurses ’ working conditions : a multi-group comparison of public and private non-profit and for-profit healthcare employers in Switzerland. BMC Hum Resour Heal. 2018;6:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stone PW, Clarke SP, Cimiotti J, Correa-de-araujo R. Nurses ’ Working Conditions : Implications for Infectious Disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(11):1984–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van Den HK, Sermeus W. Nurses’ reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(2):143–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weldetsadik AY, Gishu T, Tekleab AM, MekonnenAsfaw Y, GirmaLegesse T, Demas T. Quality of nursing care and nurses’ working environment in Ethiopia: Nurses’ and physicians’ perception. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2019;10(April):131–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2019.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gizaw AB, Gemeda TL, Yunka TT. Perceived Work Environment and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Jimma University Medical Center, Oromia Regional State South-West Ethiopia. Health Care Curr Rev. 2018;6:227. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4273.1000227.

  16. Rdova PD, D NMP, Gonzales NH, Pen MI. Role and working conditions of nurses in public health in Mexico and Peru : a binational qualitative study. J Nurs Manag. 2013;21(8):1034–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Association AN. Nurse Association. 2022. Available from: https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/workforce/

  18. Moisoglou I, Lamia GH, Yfantis AD, Galanis P. Nurses Work Environment and Patients ’ Quality of Care Nurses Work Environment and Patients ’ Quality of Care Panagiotis Prezerakos, MSc, PhD. Int J Caring Sci. 2020;13(April):108.

    Google Scholar 

  19. CSA. Statistics of amhara region. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kloos. AA a. H. Evaluation of the 2007 Ethiopian Census Data, with an Emphasis of Coverage in the Amhara Region. Ethiop J Dev Res. 2014;36(number 1).

  21. Project EHSFRHF a. G. HSFR/HFG End of Project Regional Report – Amhara. 2018.

  22. Swiger PA, Patrician PA, Susie RS, Raju D, Breckenridge-sproat S, Loan LA. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index : An updated review and recommendations for use. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;74(May):76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Amalia Sillero-Sillero AZ. Analysis of the work environment and intention of perioperative nurses to quit work * work. 2020;

  24. EpiData Association 2000.

  25. IBM SPSS Statistics 23.

  26. Abate HK, Abate AT, Tezera ZB, Beshah DT, Agegnehu CD, Getnet MA, et al. The Magnitude of Perceived Professionalism and Its Associated Factors Among Nurses in Public Referral Hospitals of West Amhara. Ethiopia Nurs Res Rev. 2021;11:21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee S-Y, Kim C-W, Kang J-H, Yoon T-H, Kim CS. Influence of the nursing practice environment on job satisfaction and turnover intention. J Prev Med public Heal. 2014;47:258–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi SP, Pang SMC, Cheung K, Wong TKS. Stabilizing and destabilizing forces in the nursing work environment: a qualitative study on turnover intension. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(10):1290–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oshodi TO, Bruneau B, Crockett R, Kinchington F, Nayar S, West E. The nursing work environment and quality of care: Content analysis of comments made by registered nurses responding to the Essentials of Magnetism II scale. Nurs Open. 2019;6(3):878–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kieft RAMM, De BBBJM, Francke AL, Delnoij DMJ. How nurses and their work environment affect patient experiences of the quality of care : a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(249):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Balsanelli AP, Cunha ICKO. The work environment and leadership in nursing: An integrative review. Rev da Esc Enferm. 2014;48(5):934–40.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Keane AE, Walden M. The Relationship Between Nurse Manager Leadership Style and Enculturation of Shared Governance. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge University of Gondar for its financial support, to the data collectors, supervisors and the study participants for being involved in the study.

Funding

University of Gondar has funding for this research report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Chanyalew Worku Kassahun, Addisu Taye Abate, Zewdu Baye Tezera, Mohammed Adem Getnet & Hailemichael Kindie Abate

  2. Department of Surgical Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Debrework Tesgera Beshah & Mahlet Temesgen Alemu

  3. Community Nursing Unit, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Chilot Desta Agegnehu

  4. Department of Nursing, College of Health Science, Enjibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia

    Birhaneslasie Gebeyehu Yazew

Authors
  1. Chanyalew Worku Kassahun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Addisu Taye Abate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zewdu Baye Tezera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Debrework Tesgera Beshah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chilot Desta Agegnehu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mohammed Adem Getnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hailemichael Kindie Abate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Birhaneslasie Gebeyehu Yazew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mahlet Temesgen Alemu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CWK, ATA, ZBT, DTB, CDA, MAG, HKA, BGY and MTA conceived and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, wrote the manuscript, read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanyalew Worku Kassahun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The overall study protocol was approved by Institutional Ethical Review Board of University of Gondar (December 15th, RNo: V/P/RCS/05/SAS/2020). Supportive letters were obtained from Amhara Regional state health bureau and then, its copies were delivered to each hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant after clearly informing the purpose of the study. Name and other personal identifiers were not be recorded to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of the data. The chance to ask anything about the study as well as right to refuse or stop to provide response at any moment were given to participants. In addition, all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kassahun, C.W., Abate, A.T., Tezera, Z.B. et al. Working environment of nurses in public referral hospitals of West Amhara, Ethiopia, 2021. BMC Nurs 21, 167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00944-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00944-9

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us