Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors associated with instrumental support in transitional care among older people with chronic disease: a cross-sectional study

BMC Nursing volume 21, Article number: 230 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Instrumental support, which is defined as practical, tangible, and informational assistance extended to patients, is crucial for older people in transition. However, little is known about instrumental support in transitional care. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the instrumental support of older people in transitional care.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted using the Questionnaire of Instrumental Support in Transitional Care (QISCT) to collect data from 747 older people in China from September to November 2020. Survey items consisted of a sociodemographic characteristics questionnaire and the QISCT. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between independent variables and the QISCT scores.

Results

The total score of the QISCT was 39.43 (± 9.11), and there was a significant gap between the anticipated support and received support. The satisfaction of instrumental support was low. Multiple regression analyses showed that educational level, the number of intimate relationships, monthly family income, monthly costs of transitional care, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated with instrumental support in transitional care.

Conclusions

To cope with the burden caused by chronic disease, the government and transitional care teams should establish a demand-oriented transitional care service model and pay more attention to helping older people obtain adequate and satisfactory instrumental support.

Peer Review reports

Background

China is the country with the largest elderly population, and it is a place where the ageing of the population is taking place most rapidly [1]. The number of people aged 80 years or older is on track to reach 115 million by 2050 [2]. Ageing is the primary driver of many chronic diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and hypertension [3,4,5]. It was reported that up to 75.8% of adults aged 60 years or older had at least one chronic disease [6]. Moreover, more than 40% of them had multiple diseases [7]. These long-term diseases have become the leading causes of death and disability worldwide [8]. The life pattern of older patients is characterized by high rates of hospital readmission, frequent transitions between different locations, and the long-term involvement of patients, families, and health care providers [9]. Readmissions pose burdens to health care systems and patients, not only in regard to subjective well-being but also to the economic impact of costly hospitalizations [10]. To reduce these burdens, transitional care has been adopted in numerous countries.

Defined by the American Geriatrics Society, transitional care refers to a set of actions designed to ensure the coordination and continuity of health care as patients transfer between different locations or different levels of care within the same location [11]. The transitional care model (TCM), which is a multicomponent, nurse-led intervention, features a hospital-to-community dwelling intervention with nine components [12]. Transitional care teams composed of multidisciplinary members play an important role in the TCM. Meanwhile, transitional care units (TCUs) have been widely used to provide psychosocial support and meaningful modality education for patients in many countries [13]. This approach is a cost-effective quality improvement intervention because it can make full use of human and material resources [14]. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the TCM and TCUs in reducing all‐cause mortality, rates and length of readmission, and hospitalization costs [14,15,16].

In China, the primary health-care system has many shortfalls, including insufficient training for practitioners, insufficient continuity of care, and a shortage of integration between public health services and clinical nursing [17]. Therefore, transitional care has been mainly provided by clinical nurses rather than community nurses through follow-up phone calls and home visits [18]. For both patients and providers, effective transitional care programs are expensive in terms of time, cost, and personnel [19]. Additionally, different from developed countries, the cost of transitional care is not a part of the basic medical insurance system in China, which leads to a greater financial burden being placed on older people. With limited funds and human resources, the obstacle to improving the quality of transitional care is the lack of financial assistance, staff support, and services [20, 21].

The role of social support in the psychosocial transition of patients with chronic disease has been a hotspot in health-care research since the 1990s. Social support is a complex construct [22] and can be categorized into different types (e.g., instrumental, appraisal, emotional support) and forms (e.g., behaviours, perceptions). Dividing social support into emotional support and instrumental support is the most common classification. Emotional support includes the provision of care, love, and concern, thereby reflecting the activities that are regarded as basic elements of noninstructional counselling [23]. Instrumental support typically includes tangible or practical forms of support, such as task assistance, funds, and direct interventions, which can be used to directly alleviate strains [24]. In this study, instrumental support was defined as the practical, tangible, and informational assistance extended to patients.

Considering the lack of staff support and financial burden in transitional care, we decided to investigate the role of instrumental support in transitional care and to assess the older adult's perception of the amount of support they received. However, most of the previous studies that measured instrumental support used the social support scale or a part of it [25], and some of these studies lack reliability and validity [26]. Meanwhile, few scales have been specifically developed for instrumental support in transitional care. Therefore, we constructed a questionnaire of instrumental support in transitional care and used it to conduct a survey. Knowledge gained by use of this questionnaire with a targeted population may include opportunities to (1). Analyze the gaps between anticipated support and received support in regard to instrumental support; (2). Explore the factors influencing instrumental support; (3). Provide advice and guidance for the government and transitional care teams to promote the development of transitional care.

Methods

Study design

The cross-sectional survey used a convenience sample of older people from two communities and three public metropolitan hospitals in Jiangsu, China, from September to November 2020.

Participants

The survey population included older people who were readmitted to the hospital and those transitioning from hospital to home. The criteria for selecting participants were (1) being aged 60 or older; (2) having a self-reported diagnosis of chronic disease; (3) receiving transitional care within three months; (4) being able to read, write or communicate; and (5) volunteering to participate in the research. We excluded those with severe cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 9) and those in intensive care.

To make the linear regression model stable, the minimum sample size should be 10–20 times the number of variables [27]. Considering the 14 variables in this study, the sample size was calculated as a minimum of 280. A 20% noncompletion rate increased the sample size to 336.

Measures

Sociodemographic characteristics questionnaire

The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants included age, gender, marital status, education level, occupation, primary caregivers, the number of intimate relationships (who provides care or support at least once a week), monthly family income, medical insurance, monthly costs of transitional care, chronic disease (e.g., heart disease, hypertension, stroke, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and risk factors (i.e., alcohol, smoking, and exercise).

The questionnaire of instrumental support in transitional care

The Questionnaire of Instrumental Support in Transitional Care (QISCT), which is based on social support theory and expectations and practical support theory, was constructed by our research group. We initially constructed the questionnaire through qualitative interviews held with older people and expert consultations. To further revise and improve the questionnaire, 180 older people were invited to participate in a preliminary survey. Through exploratory factor analysis, three factors were extracted (e.g., anticipated support, received support, and support satisfaction), and the cumulative contribution rate was as high as 69.128%. The Cronbach’s alpha of the QISCT was 0.827, and the test–retest reliability was 0.818, which indicated that the QISCT was reliable [28].

The QISCT has twelve items and three dimensions, including received support, anticipated support, and support satisfaction. Each dimension includes four aspects: service support, ways to receive support, staff support, and financial support. We were able to assess whether the four aspects of support were anticipated by, received by, or met the satisfaction of older people. By comparing what they anticipated with what they received, instances of unmet instrumental support can be found. The satisfaction of support was also measured by the questionnaire.

Scoring of the instrument: Items from 1 to 8 adopt the cumulative integral method (i.e., each item had the related options, one option counted for one point); the other items use a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 8 to 120. A higher score indicates a higher level of instrumental support.

Data collection

From September to November 2020, participants were recruited from two community health centers and three public metropolitan hospitals in Jiangsu through the referrals of nurses and word of mouth. Research assistants explained the aims and procedures of the study to eligible participants and asked them to sign informed consent forms. Then, participants were asked to complete the questionnaires. For those who had difficulty completing the questionnaire independently, researcher assistants read all the items and completed the questionnaire based on the response of participants.

Data analysis

To ensure accuracy, all data were double-entered and checked. The analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0. The participants’ sociodemographic characteristics were described in terms of number and percentage. The QISCT score was described by the mean and standard deviation. To compare QISCT scores between different groups, we used the independent-sample t test and ANOYA test (p < 0.05). Finally, the factors associated with instrumental support were assessed using multiple regression analysis. As the traditional truncation of p < 0.05 could fail to identify known clinically important variables [29], we propose p < 0.3 as an appropriate threshold for selecting variables. Additionally, we used the chi-square test to compare the differences between anticipated support and received support (p < 0.05).

Results

A total of 760 older people were recruited for the research through convenience sampling; however, nine participants did not complete the survey because of scheduling conflicts with other events. Four invalid questionnaires with misfiled questions were excluded. Finally, 747 valid questionnaires remained. The effective recovery rate was 98.2%.

Participant characteristics

Of all the subjects, 339 were female (45.4%), 160 were over the age of 80 (21.4%), and 609 had a spouse (81.5%). Only 89 (11.9%) had more than five intimate relationships. The most common monthly income range was 2000–4000 yuan, and the monthly costs of transitional care for 153 people exceeded 1000 yuan. Table 1 describes the characteristics in detail.

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of older people with chronic disease (N = 747)
Full size table

Factors associated with instrumental support in transitional care

Based on univariate analysis, many factors (p < 0.3) served as dependent variables in the multiple linear regression model. The results of multiple regression showed that educational level, the number of intimate relationships, monthly family income, monthly costs of transitional care, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease all had a significant relationship with instrumental support in transitional care, which explained 22.5% of the variance. Compared with those with primary school or lower qualifications, the level of instrumental support for older people with junior college or higher qualifications was higher. Older people with a monthly income of 2000–4000 yuan had higher QISCT scores than those with a monthly income of less than 2000 yuan, and the participants who spent more than 1000 yuan a month on transitional care had higher QISCT scores than those who spent less than 500 yuan a month. The results also showed that the QISCT scores of older people without intimate relationships were significantly lower than those with intimate relationships. In addition, older people with diabetes or COPD had higher QISCT scores than those of their counterparts. Table 2 shows the results in detail.

Table 2 Factors associated with instrumental support in transitional care (N = 747)
Full size table

Degree of instrumental support in transitional care

The mean total score of the QISCT was 39.43 (± 9.11), with a range of 20–79. The mean score for anticipated support was 12.67 (± 5.90), for received support was 10.29 (± 4.20), and support satisfactory score was 16.47 (± 2.98).

Dimensions of received support and anticipated support

The top 5 received support and anticipated support were nursing support, doctor support, disease guidance, rehabilitation guidance, and exercise guidance. There were significant differences between received support and anticipated support in many aspects, except for disease guidance, nursing support, and financial support from friends. Table 3 shows the gaps in detail.

Table 3 Gaps between received support and anticipated support
Full size table

The satisfaction of instrumental support

Most of the participants were satisfied with the level of instrumental support in transitional care. Compared with service support and staff support, the satisfaction level with financial support and the ways to get support were lower. Figure 1 shows the satisfaction of instrumental support.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The satisfaction of instrumental support in transitional care

Full size image

Discussion

This study explored the instrumental support situation for older people with chronic disease in transitional care by utilizing the QISCT. The results illustrated that the level of instrumental support in transitional care was low.

Gaps between received support and anticipated support

Our results showed that nearly half of the older people did not receive guidance on safety, living, psychology or the prevention of complications they anticipated, and many older people’s needs for therapists, nutritionists, volunteers, pharmacists, and psychological counsellors were unmet. They were fully provided with the support of disease guidance and nursing support. Transitional care teams are dominated by doctors and nurses who focus on health education and management of disease [12] and lack multidisciplinary talent, such as that possessed by nutritionists, volunteers, pharmacists, and psychological counsellors [30, 31]. Hence, the government should expand transitional care teams and establish a demand-oriented transitional care service model to meet the diversified needs of older people.

Regarding the ways in which to obtain instrumental support, 34.4% of the participants anticipated home visits, while only 8.84% received home visits. Transitional care teams have many difficulties in addressing the need for home visits, including the lack of a supervision system and well-qualified caregivers [32]. Coordinating various departments to improve personnel training, supervision and charging systems is an effective way to promote the long-term development of home visits [33]. The needs for health lectures and online platforms were also unmet because of the existence of false information and digital gaps [34, 35]. The accuracy of information was emphasized as a key to ensuring transitional care [36]. Therefore, it is urgent for transitional care teams to establish a reliable network platform and carry out credible TV education and health lectures.

Regarding the aspect of financial support, the widest gap was seen in long-term care insurance. Long-term care insurance can provide care security and financial compensation for chronically incapacitated people, which has been shown to reduce inpatient expenditure and the length of stay in hospital. However, many participants were not satisfied with the performance and outcomes of their long-term care policy [37]. There were also significant gaps between received support and anticipated support in commercial medical insurance, subsidies for hypertension and diabetes, and nonofficial subsidies. Researchers have called for introducing a reimbursement mechanism or medical insurance related to transitional care to promote older people receiving more financial subsidies.

Although there were many significant gaps between received support and anticipated support, the majority of subjects were satisfied with instrumental support. For older adults, instrumental support was mostly provided by doctors or nurses who can provide professional services and advice, so they were satisfied with the support they received. Also, influenced by traditional culture, Chinese elderly were more tolerant [38], so they were likely to accept their situation and rarely expressed their dissatisfaction to others.

The total score of instrumental support influenced by many factors

Our results illustrated that instrumental support was significantly associated with educational level, the number of intimate relationships, monthly family income, monthly costs of transitional care, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Multiple linear regression results showed that educational level and the number of intimate relationships had positive effects on instrumental support in transitional care. Education was a protective factor for healthy behaviour, which was associated with older people's health literacy and self-management [39]. In addition, people with a higher level of education may have a comprehensive perception of things, which means that they can assess physical risk factors more effectively [40] and solve health problems in multiple ways. The number of intimate relationships was a factor associated with instrumental support. Many studies have emphasized the critical role of social networks in health-related behaviours, mental health, and social support [41]. Stoller reported that spouses and children are the primary providers of instrumental support for older people. In contrast, the level of instrumental support is higher among people whose social network centre is comprised of friends [42]. The diversity of one’s social network is significant to the quality of one’s instrumental support; thus, transitional care teams should pay more attention to socially isolated people.

The economy was found to have a significant impact on instrumental support in transitional care. Chronic disease causes an economic burden on older people. In a recent report, researchers estimated that the cost of informal caregiving for people with cardiovascular disease would double from 2015 to 2035, which would represent 11% of medical and production costs. Consequently, older people with higher incomes are more likely to receive diverse support from informal caregivers, and those who spend much more money on transitional care can receive adequate support. Therefore, in further studies, we should focus on the financial burden of older people and those who spend less money on transitional care to determine whether they receive enough support.

Among older people with chronic diseases, those with diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had higher levels of instrumental support. Transitional care modes have been widely used in diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [43, 44], and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) has presented guidelines for the care of patients during the discharge process. Therefore, with a decline in physical function, the anticipated and received levels of support for older people increase. In addition, a survey reported that during the postdiagnosis programming period, friends and neighbours provide plenty of instrumental support to people with diabetes [45]. However, the instrumental support provided for the older adults with other chronic diseases is not enough, which should be the concern of the transitional care teams.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, this is a cross-sectional study, which precludes us from assigning directional causality relationships among variables. Second, to ensure the validity of the data collected, we excluded patients with severe cognitive impairment. However, the needs of these excluded patients are often unmet. We did not make a distinction between people coming from the community and hospitals. Third, respondents tended to give favourable rather than unfavourable evaluations; thus, it was hard for us to know their honest opinions. In future studies, we will continue to investigate why patients are satisfied with instrumental support versus dissatisfied through in-depth interviews.

Conclusions

Currently, the level of instrumental support for older people with chronic disease in transitional care is generally low. Older adults with diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have a higher level of instrumental support in transitional care. Our results suggest that educational level, the number of intimate relationships, monthly family income, and monthly expenses for transitional care are associated with instrumental support in transitional care. Prospective long-term follow-up studies are necessary to understand these changes in instrumental support. Our results indicate that older people have low access to financial support and many instrumental support requirements are unmet, so the government should improve fiscal support policies and establish a demand-oriented transitional care service model to meet the diversified needs of older people. In addition, the way for older adults to obtain instrumental support is relatively single, transitional care teams should establish a reliable network platform and carry out credible TV education to provide adequate instrumental support for older people.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

QISCT:

Questionnaire of Instrumental Support in Transitional Care

TCM:

Transitional Care Model

TCU:

Transitional Care Unit

ADA:

American Diabetes Association

References

  1. Guo C, Zheng X. Health Challenges and Opportunities for an Aging China. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:890–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fang EF, Xie C, Schenkel JA, et al. A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;64:101174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerr JS, Adriaanse BA, Greig NH, Mattson MP, Cader MZ, Bohr VA, Fang EF. Mitophagy and Alzheimer’s Disease: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40:151–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153:1194–217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lautrup S, Sinclair DA, Mattson MP, Fang EF. NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Cell Metab. 2019;30:630–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang LM, Chen ZH, Zhang M, et al. Study of the prevalence and disease burden of chronic disease in the elderly in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019;40:277–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yao S-S, Cao G-Y, Han L, Chen Z-S, Huang Z-T, Gong P, Hu Y, Xu B. Prevalence and Patterns of Multimorbidity in a Nationally Representative Sample of Older Chinese: Results From the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75:1974–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, Gutierrez Robledo LM, O’Donnell M, Sullivan R, Yusuf S. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet. 2015;385:549–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Facchinetti G, D’Angelo D, Piredda M, Petitti T, Matarese M, Oliveti A, De Marinis MG. Continuity of care interventions for preventing hospital readmission of older people with chronic diseases: a meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;101:103396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han MK, Martinez CH, Au DH, et al. Meeting the challenge of COPD care delivery in the USA: a multiprovider perspective. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:473–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. Transitions of care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Naylor MD, Shaid EC, Carpenter D, et al. Components of Comprehensive and Effective Transitional Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:1119–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussein WF, Bennett PN, Schiller B. Innovations to Increase Home Hemodialysis Utilization: The Transitional Care Unit. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2021;28:178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowman BT. Transitional Care Units: Greater Than the Sum of Their Parts. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:765–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Joo JY, Liu MF. Effectiveness of transitional care interventions for chronic illnesses: A systematic review of reviews. Appl Nurs Res. 2021;61:151485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morkisch N, Upegui-Arango LD, Cardona MI, van den Heuvel D, Rimmele M, Sieber CC, Freiberger E. Components of the transitional care model (TCM) to reduce readmission in geriatric patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Li X, Krumholz HM, Yip W, et al. Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations. Lancet. 2020;395:1802–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Luan HL, Sun GZ, Shao XM. Research progress of continuous care for patients with chronic diseases. J Nurs. 2014;29:92–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eh KX, Han Ang IY, Nurjono M, ShiowToh S-AE. Conducting a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitional Care Programmes: The Key Challenges and Recommendations. Int J Integr Care. 2020;20:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bradway C, Felix HC, Whitfield T, Li X. Barriers in Transitioning Patients With Severe Obesity From Hospitals to Nursing Homes. West J Nurs Res. 2017;39:1151–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ye Z-J, Liu M-L, Cai R-Q, Zhong M-X, Huang H, Liang M-Z, Quan X-M. Development of the Transitional Care Model for nursing care in Mainland China: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2016;3:113–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98:310–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman MM, King KB. The relationship of emotional and tangible support to psychological well-being among older women with heart failure. Res Nurs Health. 1994;17:433–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. French KA, Dumani S, Allen TD, Shockley KM. A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and social support. Psychol Bull. 2018;144:284–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shakespeare-Finch J, Obst PL. The development of the 2-Way Social Support Scale: a measure of giving and receiving emotional and instrumental support. J Pers Assess. 2011;93:483–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morelli SA, Lee IA, Arnn ME, Zaki J. Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion. 2015;15:484–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Z, Liu Y. Methods of nursing research. Beijing: People’s medical publishing house. 201AD. p. 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hua J, Shi X, Cui M, Xiao Y, Xie J, Geng G. Study protocol: a cross-sectional study on instrumental support for transitional care among older adults with chronic diseases. Nurs Open. 2021;8:1990–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu RF. Logistic regression variable selection and regression method selection example analysis. Chin J Evid Based Med. 2016;16:1360–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Coffey A, Mulcahy H, Savage E, Fitzgerald S, Bradley C, Benefield L, Leahy-Warren P. Transitional care interventions: relevance for nursing in the community. Public Health Nurs. 2017;34:454–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Toles M, Colón-Emeric C, Asafu-Adjei J, Moreton E, Hanson LC. Transitional care of older adults in skilled nursing facilities: a systematic review. Geriatr Nurs. 2016;37:296–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yuying T. The progress of home visiting nursing for elderly with chronic diseases in community. Shanghai Nursing. 2016;16:76–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jones A, Bronskill SE, Seow H, Feeny D, Lapointe-Shaw L, Mowbray F, Costa AP. Physician Home Visit Patterns and Hospital Use Among Older Adults with Functional Impairments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68:2074–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Litchman ML, Rothwell E, Edelman LS. The diabetes online community: Older adults supporting self-care through peer health. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101:518–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zambianchi M, Rönnlund M, Carelli MG. Attitudes Towards and Use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) Among Older Adults in Italy and Sweden: the Influence of Cultural Context, Socio-Demographic Factors, and Time Perspective. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2019;34:291–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gilliam M, Krein SL, Belanger K, Fowler KE, Dimcheff DE, Solomon G. Novel combined patient instruction and discharge summary tool improves timeliness of documentation and outpatient provider satisfaction. SAGE Open Med. 2017;5:2050312117701053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Y, Yu X. Evaluation of Long-Term Care Insurance Policy in Chinese Pilot Cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3826.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jsh Hu, Xiao J, Xf G. The relationship between the values of the elderly and the young. Chin J Gerontol. 2006;26:586–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ding W, Li T, Su Q, Yuan M, Lin A. Integrating factors associated with hypertensive patients’ self-management using structural equation modeling: a cross-sectional study in Guangdong, China. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:2169–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mihaljcic T, Haines TP, Ponsford JL, Stolwyk RJ. Self-Awareness of Falls Risk Among Elderly Patients: Characterizing Awareness Deficits and Exploring Associated Factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:2145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hansen LR, Pedersen SB, Overgaard C, Torp-Pedersen C, Ullits LR. Associations between the structural and functional aspects of social relations and poor mental health: a cross-sectional register study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Stoller EP, Earl LL. Help with activities of everyday life: sources of support for the noninstitutionalized elderly. Gerontologist. 1983;23:64–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Garnica P. Transition of Care for Patients with Diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2017;13:263–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Michael F, Whitelaw S, Van Spall HG. Transitional care quality indicators to assess quality of care following hospitalisation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e032764.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wallace DD, Gonzalez Rodriguez H, Walker E, Dethlefs H, Dowd RA, Filipi L, Barrington C. Types and sources of social support among adults living with type 2 diabetes in rural communities in the Dominican Republic. Glob Public Health. 2019;14:135–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the National Office for philosophy and Social Science for their financial support. Hereby, the authors wish to express gratitude to the invited experts for their valuable opinions and all the participating patients.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Office for philosophy and Social Science [grant number 18BSH159].

Author information

Author notes

  1. Min Cui and Jianing Hua contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medical, Nantong University, No19, Qixiu Road, Chong Chuan District, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, China

    Min Cui, Wenwen Yang, Zihan Geng & Guiling Geng

  2. Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China

    Jianing Hua

  3. Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, 20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China

    Xiaoliu Shi

  4. Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, No. 60 Qingnian Zhong road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China

    Xiangyun Qian

Authors
  1. Min Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianing Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoliu Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenwen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zihan Geng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiangyun Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guiling Geng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MC and JH contributed to the design of this study and drafted the manuscript; XS participated in data acquisition and revision of manuscript; WY and ZG performed the statistical analysis; GG and XQ reviewed the manuscript and supervised the whole study process. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangyun Qian or Guiling Geng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee on Human and Animal Medical Research of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University (Presentation Certificate for Ethical Appreciation number: 2018-K042). Meanwhile, it was approved by the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on January 22, 2019 (ref. ChiCTR1900020923). Researchers provided written information about the study for participates to let them know their legal rights on participation and confidentiality. Signing an informed consent form was considered as consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, M., Hua, J., Shi, X. et al. Factors associated with instrumental support in transitional care among older people with chronic disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 21, 230 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01014-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01014-w

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us