Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clarification of ethical principle of the beneficence in nursing care: an integrative review

BMC Nursing volume 22, Article number: 89 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ethics-based nursing practice can transform health care practices. As the biggest human capital in the health care system, nurses are obliged to follow ethical principles in this field. One of these ethical principles; is beneficence, which is considered the core of nursing care. This study aimed to investigate clarification of the principle of beneficence in nursing care and its related challenges.

Methods

This integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore & Knafl method in 5 stages, including problem identification, searching the literature, evaluating primary sources, analyzing data, and presenting the results. Databases like SID, Irandoc, Magiran, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the keywords; “beneficence”, “ethic”, “nursing” and “care” in English and Persian in the time range of 2010 to 10 February, 2023. After applying inclusion criteria and assessing the articles using Bowling’s Quality Assessment Tool, finally, 16 papers were included from 984.

Results

After reviewing and evaluating the qualified articles, the findings were classified into four main categories: (1) nature, (2) applicability, (3) Relevant and influential factors, and (4) challenges related to the ethical principle of beneficence in nursing care.

Conclusion

Based on the results of this review it seems that paying attention to clarification the principle of beneficence in nursing care can provide positive outcomes for patients to benefit from this principle and finally, it leads to increasing the well-being and health of patients, reducing their mortality rate, increasing satisfaction and maintaining the respect and human dignity of patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Today, nurses are considered the biggest human capital in the health care system [1]; so the care provided by them is one of the main components of services in this system [2]. Providing care based on ethics is one of the approaches in the nursing discipline that nursing ethics theorists have discussed [3]. An ethical nursing practice can transform healthcare practices [4]. Nursing ethics is considered an issue of bioethics, and a short time has passed since its formation [5]. Bioethics is the application of ethical theories and principles in ethical issues or healthcare dilemmas [6]. Therefore, understanding these principles and values is considered the first step in understanding ethics and its relationship with health care [7]. Good nursing care aims at the enhancement of the dignity of the human being in all dimensions and also succeeds to realize this intention in practice and it is considered dignity-enhancing care [8]. Hence, The nursing profession is considered a discipline with a health-oriented approach, which, focuses on the caring situations and helps people to adapt to their disease and improve their current performance capacity despite the disease [4].

The history of nursing shows that professional ethics, as a familiar concept in nursing, has been an inherent part of this profession since the early days, and it is internationally recognized as an essential part of nurses’ practice [9]. Four basic principles for bioethics were stated by Beauchamp and Childress, which are autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence [10]. Ideally, these principles are the same ones that all nurses should be aware of in their practice and follow in caring for clients in order to provide the best, safest, and most humanistic care for all of them [11]. One of these basic principles is “beneficence” which is considered the basis of nursing and medical activities that performing such beneficial actions can encourage the motivation of good works [7]. It dares to say that the ethical principle of beneficence is an integral part of the mission of the nursing profession [12], which, according to a definition, implies doing positive things to help patients [7]. “Beneficence” is mentioned as a key component of bioethics and its outcome can help to receive the important and legitimate interests of the patient [13]. Although the concept of beneficence is widely used in medical sciences, it is not easy to define it precisely [14], and even few studies in health sciences have addressed the concept of beneficence [15,16,17]. In the nursing discipline, although professional ethics are well established, there is no real understanding of ethical principles [9], for this reason, several interpretations and definitions have been proposed [14]. Various definitions of beneficence have been presented in different kinds of literature, which consider this principle as the essence of ethics and doing “good” with mercy, kindness, generosity, and charity for patients [10]. Also, sometimes this principle is also mentioned in the meaning of doing good, kindness, and charity or any action that benefits others [14]. Singh & Ivory (2014) consider beneficence as the responsibility of healthcare experts to promote the well-being of patients through research and implementation of therapeutic interventions with the highest probability of positive patient outcomes [15]. In addition to these definitions, the principle of beneficence emphasizes the ethical commitment to the benefit, including protecting patients’ rights, preventing harm to them, and helping those at risk [18]. In another view, beneficence is interpreted as ensuring the provision of care with positive benefits and protecting patients, which plays a major role in all health care [19]. These views confirm the difficulty of implementing the principle of beneficence, which requires the definition of “what is good for the patient“ [20].

On the other hand; studies show that beneficence as an integral part of bioethics has always been beside other ethical principles, including autonomy, justice, and confidentiality, and therefore, there is a major challenge to balance the patient’s right to choose and the benevolent intention of the caregiver [21], and as mentioned, sometimes the care measures that guarantee beneficence may violate other ethical principles such as patient autonomy [22]. Of course, ethical conflicts are an integral part of nursing, because they try to fulfill their needs, goals, and efforts in the overall provision of nursing care [23], but despite this point of view, it should be said that nurses’ ethical commitment requires benefiting the patient by ignoring personal interests for the needs of the patients, their well-being and preferences [24, 25]. It has been found that ethical dilemmas are sensitive to culture and context and reflects differences in culture, social attitudes, and legal principles [23], studies also emphasize that in order to beneficence in nursing care, they should pay attention to the cultural, social and ethical factors of patients [26].

What is obvious is that the basic issue in the principle of beneficence is the commitment to the benefit of patients in nursing care [27]. Although various studies have addressed this concept in a limited way, very few and scattered studies have focused on bioethics in nursing sciences and the principle of beneficence, and there is still no comprehensive and clear understanding of this concept as an ethical principle in providing nursing care. It should be noted that an integrative review study is a specific review method that summarizes empirical or theoretical studies that have already been conducted to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a specific phenomenon or healthcare problem [28]. Based on this, integrated reviews have the potential to expand the body of knowledge and create nursing science, knowledge, research, practice, and policies. In addition, these kinds of studies show the current state of knowledge in each discipline, help to develop theory, and have a direct application in the clinical fields and health policies [29]. Therefore, it seems that the results of this study can help clarify the concept of beneficence in nursing. Considering the importance of the principle of beneficence in nursing care and increasing patient satisfaction, we decided to review the studies conducted on this issue.

Methods

Study design

This study is an integrated review based on articles related to the ethical principle of beneficence, which was conducted to collect data from various studies on this concept. This integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore & Knafl method in 5 stages of review, including (a) problem identification, (b) searching the literature, (c) evaluating data from primary sources, (d) analyzing data, and (e) presenting the results, using of this method also increases the rigor of this study [29,30,31].

Search strategy

According to the Whittemore & Knafl method, a) in the first stage, the following question was set to answer the study’s aim: What is the ethical principle of beneficence in nursing care and its related challenges?

b) In the second stage, searching for articles was done by two researchers in the time range of 2010 to February 10, 2023. Databases like SID, Irandoc, Magiran, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus were searched using the keywords; “beneficence,“ “ethic,“ “nursing,“ and “care” in English and Persian separately or combined using Boolean operators: AND and OR for papers that were published. The result of the initial and comprehensive search included 984 articles. After applying the inclusion criteria, including access to the full text of the article, writing in Persian and English, and the presence of keywords in the title and abstract of the article, finally, 968 were removed.

Eligibility criteria

c) In the third stage, to evaluate the data, two researchers reviewed the content of the studies to evaluate their quality using Bowling’s Quality Assessment Tool [32], so 4 articles were excluded by this tool, and then the results were compared. Finally, 16 articles were included in this study (Fig. 1 following the renewed PRISMA guideline) [33]. The Bowling tool consists of items that were used to check the structure of the methodology and present the results of the studies with a triple scale: yes, weak and unreported, which led to the elimination of weak and unreported articles.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Full size image

Data extraction

The key data extracted from the articles included: the authors’ profile, the publication’s year, the country of the study, the title and the methodology of the study, and also the main results that were extracted by the two researchers.

Data synthesis

Data charts were designed independently by two researchers and they were evaluated. The data chart was updated in a continuous process. Then, the extracted data were analyzed and interpreted. The data analysis process was initiated when the final 16 papers for inclusion were determined and had been verified by all three authors. First, a data extraction sheet were created to document the required information for each review, including the five methodological stages. So, each review was analyzed individually by two researchers separately. All of the data gathered in the data extraction sheets was read by the same two researchers, who reached a consensus on selecting pertinent and significant items for each stage. Then, the similarities and differences among the reviews with regard to each methodological stage were examined throughout the data analysis process. Finally, conclusion drawing and verification were performed by all three authors to ensure that all 16 reviews were thoroughly assessed in terms of methodological stages and that the results described matched the research questions of this present study.

Quality appraisal

Whittemore and Knafl (2005) state that assessing the quality of the included evidence is not essential in a supplementary review [30]. All studies meeting the inclusion criteria, regardless of their methodological quality, were retained in the review to examine all evidence of the factors that influenced the nursing role implementation in practice settings.

Results

According to the framework of review and selection of articles, 16 articles were selected from 984 articles. All articles included in this study were in English, including quantitative (n = 2) and qualitative (n = 14) studies.

After reviewing and evaluating the qualified articles, the findings were classified into four main categories as follows: (1) nature, (2) applicability, (3) Relevant and influential factors, and (4) challenges related to the ethical principle of beneficence in nursing care (Table 1).

Table 1 Main categories and sub-categories extract from the review of selected articles
Full size table

Discussion

The present study investigated the ethical principle of beneficence in nursing care and its related challenges in different studies. This integrated review identified four main categories (nature, applicability, relevant and influential factors, and challenges) and twenty-six sub-categories. It is obvious that the ethical principle of beneficence is an integral part of the nursing code, also called the “moral heart of the nursing profession,“ so a nurse should provide nursing care only with the goal to provide benefit to the client [16]. It is on this basis in nursing ethics, beneficence is considered a moral commitment that is worthy and generous [43]. Despite the role of this ethical principle in nursing care, the Lack of acquaintance with the definition of the beneficence concept is considered an important challenge [36]. What is observed in the reviewed studies; “doing good” is considered beneficial [12, 20, 22, 26, 34, 35, 36, 37]. The difficulty of implementing this ethical principle; requires a clear definition of “what is good for a patient“ [20]. This definition has been expressed in different forms in different studies, including doing good [12, 20, 22, 26, 34, 35, 36, 37], maximum positive benefits for patients [16, 20, 22, 24, 34, 36, 37, 38], best care [16, 23, 34, 35, 37], the core of care [20], and ethical commitment to the benefit for patients [39].

The patient’s best interest must be the center of ethical decision-making at all times [44], so healthcare workers have to provide more patient-centered care to include attention to patient priorities and preferences [12]. It is on this basis that in every context or every part of society, people should be encouraged to do good acts and benevolence, and their work and actions, both professional and personal, should benefit the people of the whole society [45]. The outcome of this good action will be providing maximum positive benefits for the patients and achieving the best care for them [34, 35, 46], which will ultimately improve their health and general well-being [45, 46] because the core of ethical care is the pursuit of moral attitude and goodness [47].

A beneficent act promotes the betterment and welfare of patients, and nurses should deliver professional care to enhance the recovery of patients. As Beauchamp and Childress (2013) mentioned this principle is positive beneficence and break it down into three components: to prevent evil or harm; to remove evil or harm; and to do or promote good [48, 49, 50]. Also, beneficence considers the balancing of the benefits of treatment against the risks and costs; so, the healthcare professional should act in a way that benefits the patient [51], and Edwards (2009) states that beneficence is about promoting the well-being of those with whom we interact [52]. In most cases, the principle of beneficence and non-maleficence mean together [12, 16, 22, 26, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 44], because non-maleficence prevents harming the patient but rather seeks to improve people’s well-being and health [20]. In fact, avoiding any useless intervention and any action that may lead to irreparable harm (such as death) to the patient; is interpreted as non-maleficence. As mentioned, beneficence and non-maleficence are often two sides of the same coin and are discussed together, as the former involves doing good acts that benefit others, and the latter involves avoiding actions that harm oneself or others. Having these two principles together, conflicts between the care team and the patient’s families are inevitable [53]. Although both of these principles are important, the duty of non-maleficence is considered a stronger commitment in health care [54], and the principle of beneficence requires that “good” be done, and “harmful” actions for patients be avoided [10]. It may be said that the distinction between these two important ethical principles lies in the fact that beneficence is an ethical commitment to take positive steps to help patients and not merely to prevent harm [55].

Recent research shows that healthcare institutions and organizations that have a benevolent ethical atmosphere may achieve better clinical results, improve patient and family satisfaction, and reduce patient mortality [56]. The importance of these two principles, as the main values of nursing, always influences their behavior to direct their actions for the benefit of patients [36]. Nevertheless, nurses should understand that benevolent actions may not always be a benefit to patients [57] and sometimes conflict with preserving the ethical principle of autonomy [16, 22, 25, 26, 34, 37, 38, 39]. Per Ross’s ethical principles, all human beings should follow before the factors such as the benefit or utility of outcomes and results, like justice-fair distribution of benefits, risks, and costs [58].

Since the professional duty to respect the rights of patients and their autonomy in decision-making is considered a universally accepted norm [57], it may be said that nowhere in ethical decision-making situations; the contradiction is not as obvious as when the principles of beneficence and autonomy collide [46]. However, in all clinical decision-making situations, novice and experienced nurses must consider the patient’s right to autonomy and consider their nursing care beneficial for the patient’s health outcomes [59]. To achieve this level of care, nurses should expand the scope of ethical principles of beneficence, autonomy and, patient Advocacy in patient care [22].

The principle of beneficence makes it necessary to provide equitable care based on need and equally without discrimination for all patients [53], so when nurses are required to make decisions that negate the patient’s autonomy, these decisions should be considered as complying with the principle of benefit for them [59]. When beneficence and autonomy are in conflict and coercion is necessary for beneficence, the healthcare team needs a way to resolve this dichotomy and retain their self-esteem, in these cases, they may experience cognitive dissonance, a phenomenon that defines the mental tension arising when conflicting attitudes are held or when behaviors are incompatible with certain attitudes [60]. So, ignoring the principle of patient autonomy is considered a very serious issue, but it can be considered when there are real reasons to maximize beneficence and as long as it is consistent with the patient’s values [46, 61]. Therefore, a nurse can only prioritize beneficence over the principle of client autonomy when there is a good reason that the client’s respect will be preserved and she/he will really benefit from this approach [16, 39]. Nevertheless, sometimes nurses report that they experience ethical dilemmas in ethical principles; in these cases, it is recommended that nurses decide on the best care option for patients; consider their needs and preferences [25]. The beneficence can include patient autonomy because “the best interests of patients are closely related to their preferences,“ which is one of the main duties of the health team towards all patients [62]. However, beneficence is defined as ‘the principle of doing good and providing care to others’ by Berglund(2007) [63].On the other hand; respecting the needs, values, and preferences of the patient and their family are at the core of nursing care, and nurses should be aware of these needs by documenting the life history of the patients because the needs and interests of patients are formed based on religious, cultural and social issues [16, 26, 41, 64]. This attention to values in care protects and defends the client and ensures that the best decisions are made in the best way [64].

A concern to promote beneficence may be expressed in traditional medical ethics by paternalism, where the health professional makes a decision based upon a perspective of acting in the patient’s best interests. However, some believed that this approach acts against person-centered values found in nursing ethics [65]. By the way, health care balances the ethical principles of beneficence and justice, and the best possible care for patients with equitable care is presented for the entire population using limited resources in the most efficient way [35]. It should also be considered that the principle of justice provides a key link between the importance of health for individuals and the responsibilities of promoting the health of society [66]. Indeed, it is optimal to both respect choice and protects from harmful choice, but sometimes this is not possible [49]. However, any choices for the patient may sometimes create a conflict between justice and beneficence [34]. Some researchers consider the attention to beneficence before justice, although the principle based on justice is based on profit, which is reflected in the health system [66]. However, the priorities of health care should be focused on distributive justice, which means that decisions should be made in such a way that, according to the amount of cost; will provide care to patients that is beneficial for a large number of patients and focus on achieving the greatest benefit for a large number of them [35]. According to the studies, most ethical theories have accepted various aspects of beneficence and consider it as a basis for creating the most benefit for all patients [19].

The attention and focus of the principle of beneficence in nursing management are also on providing safe, effective, timely, efficient, fair, and patient-centered care combined with accuracy, kindness, and staff collaboration [37]. In such ethical climates, nursing staff is supported by managers in decisions- making For the benefit of patients [67]. With this point of view, the ethical principle of beneficence will undoubtedly be an integral part of the mission of the nursing profession to reduce the pain and suffering of patients [68]. Achieving this requires nurses to be equipped with ethical knowledge and insight [16], and the responsibility of nurses as an ethical commitment for increasing patient’s trust and their families, so that the beneficence applicability will reduce their pain and suffering, especially in end-of-life and palliative care [41].

All patients should be treated with dignity and protected from any possible harm, it is the professional’s moral obligation, to not cause harm [69, 70]. Thus, beneficence and non-maleficence are connected to the patient’s rights, and the safety of care that guarantees care free of danger or risk of injury [71]. Each care program and treatment should provide absolute benefit to the patient, and the nurse’s essential responsibility is to ensure the individual’s safety. As a result, the nurse considers all of the care practices that will be beneficial to the patient before implementing them [72, 73], and in accordance with these principles, they revealed that they valued patient safety, sought to avoid risk and harm, and sought to help cope, regardless of illness or functional impairment [74]. When medical errors are not reported, the principle of beneficence is threatened, as non-reporting prevents other healthcare professionals from accessing relevant information and avoiding similar errors. Ethics and patient safety are intertwined, so, a lack of honesty in communication and a lack of commitment to finding solutions to adverse events is both disrespectful to beneficence and non-maleficence principles, and it compromises patient safety [75].

Truth-telling to the patient as an issue of communication and trust is considered as the applicability of beneficence, which nurses should combine with the patient’s autonomy and balance in their care. As a result, the goal of Truth-telling in health care will be achieving treatment that is effective and based on the patient’s interest [26, 44, 46], and support [16]. In this way, healthcare workers should pay attention to the cultural, social, and ethical differences of patients [16, 26].

In general, it should be noted that the main guideline in ethical judgment about different choices, especially in cases of conflict and dilemmas, is to refer to beneficence, which includes a kind of rational profit in terms of cost-effectiveness regarding the results of the intervention and outcomes for the patient [53].

Studies show that although nurses have good knowledge about nursing ethics, most are not familiar with the principle of beneficence in nursing care and what is good for the patient and for her/his benefit [34, 42]. However, health promotion programs, policies, research, and access to health care have the principle of beneficence at their core [20]. Therefore, considering the importance of the principle of beneficence in nursing care; it is necessary to carry out appropriate studies with the approach of the beneficence concept and different aspects of this important ethical principle.

Conclusion

The ethical principle of beneficence is considered an important issue and one of the primary values in nursing care, and this is while the results of the present study clarify different aspects of this principle. Lack of acquainted with the definition of the beneficence concept in nursing care is an important challenge that makes it necessary to conduct more studies focusing on the analysis of the concept of the beneficence and developing appropriate instruments in different nursing wards and fields for its measure and application. It seems that conducting clarification of the approach of the principle of beneficence in nursing care can provide positive outcomes for patients to benefit from this principle.

On the other hand, paying attention to the applicability obtained from studies that focus on reducing and predicting pain, fair distribution of resources and care, performing evidence-based care, not harming the patient, telling the truth in the correct situation, performing palliative and ending life care and finally the patient’s safety in nursing care leads to increasing the well-being and health of patients, reducing their mortality and preserving human respect and dignity. Promoting a dignified life by observing the principle of beneficence for patients in nursing care, and paying attention to the principles of autonomy and justice, will ultimately increase patients’ satisfaction. Therefore, it is suggested that more studies should be done focusing on identifying the exact dimensions of the concept of beneficence, developing an appropriate instrument to measure this concept in nursing care, and providing adequate training in this direction.

Limitations

The limitations of this study include: not searching for articles in languages other than English and Persian, so our search strategies may have under-represented studies in other languages, such as Spanish and Portuguese.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All requests relating to data should be addressed to rozitacheraghi@gmail.com.

References

  1. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27(3):759–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchanan J, Dawkins P, Lindo JL. Satisfaction with nursing care in the emergency department of an urban hospital in the developing world: a pilot study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015;23(3):218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikfarid L. Care of ethics: a nursing approach to ethics. teb va tazkiye. 2016;25(1):9–18. (Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Newman M. Transforming presence: The difference that nursing makes. Philadelphia, PA: FA, Davis Co. ISBN10-0-8036-1752-6, 2008.

  5. Horn P, editor. Editor the philosophical basis of bioethics. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology. Elsevier; 2015.

  6. Berman A, Snyder SJ, Levett-Jones T, Dwyer T, Hales M, Harvey N, et al. Kozier and Erb’s Fundamentals of nursing [4th australian edition]. Pearson Australia; 2018.

  7. C. T. Potter & Perry’s fundamentals of nursing.Elsevier Australia. 2018.

  8. Gastmans C. Dignity-enhancing nursing care: a foundational ethical framework. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20(2):142–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kangasniemi M, Pakkanen P, Korhonen A. Professional ethics in nursing: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(8):1744–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics: marking its fortieth anniversary. Taylor & Francis; 2019. pp. 9–12.

  11. Black B. Professional nursing e-book: concepts & challenges. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.

  12. Denny DL, Guido GW. Undertreatment of pain in older adults: an application of beneficence. Nurs Ethics. 2012;19(6):800–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Avant LC, Swetz KM. Revisiting beneficence: what is a ‘Benefit’, and by what criteria? Am J Bioeth. 2020;20(3):75–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mawere M. Critical reflections on the principle of beneficence in biomedicine.Pan African Medical Journal. 2012;11(1).

  15. Singh JP, Ivory M. Beneficence/non-maleficence.The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. 2014:1–3.

  16. Gulzar S, Karmaliani R. Sexual abuse: an ethical dilemma of Autonomy vs. Beneficence and the role of Healthcare Providers in a community setting. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2012;4(3):198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Roubaix J. Beneficence, non-maleficence, distributive justice and respect for patient autonomy–reconcilable ends in aesthetic surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2011;64(1):11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cummings CL, Mercurio MR. Autonomy, beneficence, and rights.Pediatr Rev. 2010;31.

  19. Kinsinger FS. Beneficence and the professional’s moral imperative. J Chiropr Humanit. 2009;16(1):44–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ivanov LL, Oden TL. Public health nursing, ethics and human rights. Public Health Nurs. 2013;30(3):231–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Macciocchi SN. Doing good: the pitfalls of beneficence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(1):72–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pope B, Hough M, Chase S. Ethics in community nursing. J Health Ethics. 2016;12(2):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Usberg G, Uibu E, Urban R, Kangasniemi M. Ethical conflicts in nursing: an interview study. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(2):230–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Manthous CA. Hippocrates as hospital employee: balancing beneficence and contractual duty. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21(1):60–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yönt GH, Korhan EA, Dizer B, Gümüs F, Koyuncu R. Examination of ethical dilemmas experienced by adult intensive care unit nurses in physical restraint practices. Holist Nurs Pract. 2014;28(2):85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ling D-L, Yu H-J, Guo H-L. Truth-telling, decision-making, and ethics among cancer patients in nursing practice in China. Nurs Ethics. 2019;26(4):1000–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trans J. Hippocrates ‘Selections from the Hippocratic Corpus’ In Veatch, R. M. ed. Cross cultural perspectives in medical ethics, J and Burllett Publishers: Boston. 1989.

  28. (Rodgers BLKnafl K.A., editors, editor. Concept Development in nursing. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1993. pp. 231–50. Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts.

  29. Cooper H. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.

  30. Whttemore R, Knaff K. The integrative review: update methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Levitt HM, Bamberg M, Creswell JW, Frost DM, Josselson R, Suárez-Orozco C. Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: the APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. Am Psychol. 2018;73(1):26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw-hill education (UK); 2014.

  33. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst reviews. 2021;10(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Strøm BS, Engedal K. Ethical aspects in dementia care-The use of psychosocial interventions. Nursing ethics. 2021;28(3):435-43.

  35. Manda-Taylor L, Mndolo S, Baker T. Critical care in Malawi: The ethics of beneficence and justice. Malawi Medical Journal. 2017;29(3):268-71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Dolan C. Moral, ethical, and legal decision-making in controversial NP practice situations. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2017;13(2):e57-e65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Robichaux C, Sauerland J. Health care quality and ethics: Implications for practice and leadership. Perioperative Nursing Clinics. 2012;7(3):333-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Felix ZC, Batista PSdS, Costa SFGd, Lopes MEL, Oliveira RCd, Abrão FMdS. Nursing care in terminality: compliance with principles of bioethics. Revista gaucha de enfermagem. 2014;35:97-102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dowie I. Legal, ethical and professional aspects of duty of care for nurses. Nursing Standard (2014+). 2017;32(16-19):47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fisher K, Robichaux C, Sauerland J, Stokes F. A nurses’ ethical commitment to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Nursing ethics. 2020;27(4):1066-76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCabe MS, Coyle N, editors. Ethical and legal issues in palliative care. Seminars in oncology nursing; 2014: Elsevier.

  42. Aliyu D, Adeleke IT, Omoniyi SO, Samaila BA, Adamu A, Abubakar AY. Knowledge, attitude and practice of nursing ethics and law among nurses at Federal Medical Centre, Bida. American journal of health research. 2015;3(1-1):32-7.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tarlier DS. Beyond caring: the moral and ethical bases of responsive nurse–patient relationships. Nursing Philosophy. 2004;5(3):230-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tagin M, Zhu C, Gunn AJ. Beneficence and nonmaleficence in treating neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Developmental Neuroscience. 2015;37(4-5):305-10.

  45. Beauchamp TL, Childress JFE. Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  46.  Varkey B. Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Medical Principles and Practice. 2021;30(1):17-28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen H-Y, Tsai W-D, editors. Reflections on the Doctor-Patient Relationship in Medical Humanities from the Perspective of Care Ethics. 6th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities(Philosophy of Being Human as the Core of Interdisciplinary Research)(ICCESSH 2021); 2021: Atlantis Press.

  48. Beauchamp T, J. C. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013

  49. Larkin GL, Marco CA, Abbott JT. Emergency Determination of Decision‐making Capacity: Balancing Autonomy and Beneficence in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2001;8(3):282-4.

  50. Lin YP, Tsai YF. Maintaining patients’ dignity during clinical care: a qualitative interview study. Journal of advanced nursing. 2011;67(2):340-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rosahl S. The issue of leadership in health care. Healthcare Papers. 2003;4:78-8.

  52. Edwards S. Nursing ethics: a principle-based approach: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2009.

  53. Bathaie FS, Larijani BA, Farzadfar F, Nedjat S, Emami-Razavi SH, Kadivar M, et al. Provision of healthcare services for children in Iran: common ethical principles and obstacles to successful implementation. Acta Medica Iranica. 2018:457-64.

  54. Thompson DR. Principles of ethics: in managing a critical care unit. Critical care medicine. 2007;35(2):S2-S10.

  55. Nelson WA, Gardent PB, Shulman E, Splaine ME. Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2010;19(6):526-30.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Robichaux C. Developing ethical skills: from sensitivity to action. Critical Care Nurse. 2012;32(2):65-72.

    Google Scholar 

  57. PCo E. Pakistan Nursing Council, National Institute of Health, Islamabad. 2000.

  58. Beauchamp TL, Walters LE. Contemporary issues in bioethics (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Woodsworth Thomson Learn-ing. 2003.

  59. Chase SK. Clinical judgment and communication in nurse practitioner practice. Philadelphia, PA: F A Davis Company. 2004.

  60. Mortensen AH, Stojiljkovic M, Lillekroken D. Strategies to manage cognitive dissonance when experiencing resistiveness to care in people living with dementia: A qualitative study. Journal of advanced nursing. 2022;78(2):486-97.

  61. MacDonald C. Nurse autonomy as relational. Nursing ethics. 2002;9(2):194-201.

  62. Pellegrino ED. For the patient’s good: The restoration of beneficence in health care. 1988.

  63. C. B. Ethics for health care. Third Edition Oxford University Press: Oxford. 2007.

  64. Brooker D. What is person-centred care in dementia? Reviews in clinical gerontology. 2003;13(3):215-22.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  65. Rumbold G. Ethics in nursing practice. Edinburgh; New York: Bailliere Tindall. 1999.

  66. Kelleher JP. Beneficence, justice, and health care. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2014;24(1):27-49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Rathert C, Fleming DA. Hospital ethical climate and teamwork in acute care: the moderating role of leaders. Health Care Management Review. 2008;33(4):323-31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tucker KL. The debate on elder abuse for undertreated pain. Pain Medicine. 2004;5(2):214-7.

  69. Kadivar M, Manookian A, Asghari F, Niknafs N, Okazi A, Zarvani A. Ethical and legal aspects of patient’s safety: a clinical case report. Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine. 2017;10:15.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Leape LL. Ethical issues in patient safety. Thoracic Surgery Clinics. 2005;15(4):493-501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Gallagher E, Alcock D, Diem E, Angus D. Ethical dilemma in home care case management/Practitioner response. Journal of Healthcare Management. 2002;47(2):85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lawrence DJ. The four principles of biomedical ethics: a foundation for current bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities. 2007;14:34-40.

  73. Burkhardt AM, AK. N. Çağdaş Hemşirelikte Etik. Alpar ŞE, Bahçecik N, Karabacak Ü, çeviri 1 Baskı İstanbul: Medikal Yayıncılık. 2013.

  74. Mæhre KS, Bergdahl E, Hemberg J. Patients’, relatives’ and nurses’ experiences of palliative care on an advanced care ward in a nursing home setting in Norway. Nursing Open. 2022 Nov 30.

  75. Nora CRD, Junges JR. Patient safety and ethical aspects: scoping review. Revista Bioética. 2021;29:304-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Considering that the present study was an integrated review study and the results of other researchers’ studies have been used, the research team would like to express their gratitude to all whose studies were used in this study.

Funding

No funds were used to conduct this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Surgical Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Rozita Cheraghi

  2. Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Hadi Hassankhani

  3. Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Anahita Jafarzadeh

  4. Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Leila Valizadeh

  5. Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Vahid Zamanzadeh

Authors
  1. Rozita Cheraghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leila Valizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vahid Zamanzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hadi Hassankhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anahita Jafarzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RCH: study design, data collection and search, analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript; LV: concept design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript; VZ: review and critical revision of the manuscript; HH: supervision of the review and critical revision of the final manuscript, checking the translation and for grammar. AJ: data collection and search. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rozita Cheraghi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was not required to conduct this review.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheraghi, R., Valizadeh, L., Zamanzadeh, V. et al. Clarification of ethical principle of the beneficence in nursing care: an integrative review. BMC Nurs 22, 89 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01246-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01246-4

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us