Skip to main content

Nursing students perspectives of psychosocial care: cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial care is an integral component of holistic nursing practices. This study aimed to examine how fourth-year nursing students at Mutah University perceive various care characteristics, specifically psychosocial care.

Methods

A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted using the Caring Dimension Inventory (CDI). Data were obtained from 105 nursing students before graduating from a Jordanian public educational institution. Data analyzed using the scoring of CDI and descriptive statistics.

Results

The mean scores in the professional and technical domain of care were statistically higher for fourth-year nursing students (4.69 ± 0.25). This exceeded their scores in the psychosocial domain of care (3.37 ± 1.20). This suggests that fourth-year nursing students prioritize professional and technical care over psychosocial care.

Conclusions

Fourth-year nursing students tended to perceive the technical aspects of care as more significant than the psychosocial aspects. This highlights the need for nursing schools and healthcare providers to reconsider their focus and prioritize the importance of psychosocial care.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Psychosocial care is an essential aspect of nursing practice and its significance has been emphasized in various nursing frameworks and guidelines. The International Council of Nurses (ICN) has identified psychosocial care as a key component of comprehensive nursing care and is essential for universal health coverage [1]. The American Nurses Association (ANA) has also emphasized the importance of psychosocial care in nursing practice and recommends that nurses provide holistic care that addresses the physical, psychological, and social needs of patients [2]. The definition of psychosocial care focuses on the psychological and emotional health. Covers a wide range of topics, including self-esteem, understanding and coping with illness, communication, and social interaction [3]. Although holistic nursing care requires addressing physical and psychosocial needs for better patient outcomes, there is evidence that nurses often do not approach this aspect of care adequately for many reasons [3,4,5,6,7,8].

As nurses progress in their education, they acquire knowledge, abilities, and attitudes related to psychosocial care. Nursing students play a crucial role in providing psychosocial care to patients. However, research has indicated that nursing students may lack the skills and knowledge needed to provide patients with adequate psychosocial treatment [9,10,11,12,13,14]. To allow nursing students to provide patients with better care, it is necessary to assess their degree of psychosocial support and pinpoint areas of development [14].

There is a need to understand how many nursing students in the Middle East and particularly in Jordan are prepared to support and provide care based on the psychosocial domain. In Jordan, 9103 nursing students enrolled in seven public and eight private institutions during the year 2021/2022 [15]. Mutah University is recognized as one of the leading schools in Jordan, with 640 students enrolled in regular, parallel, bridging, and international nursing programs. The nursing program at Mutah University features specialized courses, such as mental health nursing, community health nursing, and nursing leadership, with a strong emphasis on addressing the psychosocial dimensions of nursing care. A recent evaluation of the program and a study indicated the need to evaluate the psychosocial competency of nursing students [16].

This article presents the results of a research study conducted at Mutah University, which aimed to investigate the level of psychosocial support available to fourth-year nursing students. The central focus of this study revolved around the following research question: To what extent do fourth-year nursing students at Mutah University receive adequate psychosocial care?

Literature review

It is widely acknowledged that nursing is a caring profession and that caring is fundamental to professional nursing practice [13, 17,18,19,20]. The process by which a nurse responds to a patient as an individual, senses their feelings, and distinguishes them from the norm is frequently described as caring [13, 19]. On the other hand, caring is difficult to define, most likely because it is not limited to nursing [21, 22]. Caring is a primary way of being in a world that is crucial in our relationships with others as well as ourselves [7]. However, as a generally recognized notion, care is at the heart of nursing's scope of practice [22].

The caring science-based curriculum has emerged as the main concept in nursing education. The objective is to teach nursing students how to provide medical care to licensed nurses [7]. Medical and nursing students experience emotional and practical implications of their care [16, 23, 24]. Nursing students must have emotional maturity, sensitivity, dedication, skills, self-assurance, and a sense of duty to their patients [16]. Similarly to what is expected of professional medical and nursing students, they should demonstrate good communication, patience, courage, and supportive attributes in terms of practical skills [10]. Nursing students participate in their educational journey both in the classroom and in real world settings, as these encounters are crucial to their intellectual development and professional advancement [24].

In an environment of intensive international scrutiny of healthcare, nurse educators work to increase professionalism in providing psychosocial care to their students [10]. Although this objective is widely sought, limited research has explored changes in students' perceptions of their own psychosocial care and that provided by their peers throughout their nursing programs. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to examine the perceptions of final-year nursing students regarding the attributes of psychosocial care within their nursing education.

Research questions

The following questions were addressed in this study.

  1. 1.

    Which domain of care is perceived as more important by fourth-year nursing students?

  2. 2.

    How do fourth-year nursing students perceive psychosocial care?

Methodology

Design

A quantitative design based on a cross-sectional study was used.

Study population

Bachelors’ nurses were the target of this study. Fourth-year nursing students (n= 138) from Mutah University were invited to participate in this study.

Study instrument

Participant responses were collected using the CDI. This questionnaire, established by Watson in 1997, assesses how people view their compassion. Comprising 25 items, the CDI covers aspects such as technical and professional care, inappropriate selflessness, acceptable selflessness or altruism, and psychological care [20].

The inventory was used to collect data on nursing students’ perspectives on various aspects of nursing care. The Likert scale was used, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree on a five-point scale. In this study, the assessment was intended to gain insight into students' perceptions of care with a specific emphasis on psychosocial care.

Reliability and validity

The researchers utilized the Arabic version of the tool, which was validated and found to be reliable within the Jordanian cultural context, achieving a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.89 [20]. Furthermore, we assessed the dependability, measurement, and meaningfulness of the questionnaire items and calculated Cronbach's alpha to gauge the internal consistency of the 25 items in the CDI. A score obtained of 0.91 indicates a strong level of internal consistency, confirming the reliability and cohesion of the items [25].

Ethical approval

The study was conducted at Mutah University's Faculty of Nursing and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. All participants provided informed consent, and the questionnaire incorporated a statement that ensured anonymity, confidentiality, and the option to withdraw from the study.

Procedure

Following the necessary permissions granted by the faculty to distribute surveys within classrooms for a duration of two weeks, students were approached to participate. The participants were encouraged to complete the questionnaires and ensure anonymity by depositing them in the researcher's mailbox located at the Faculty of Nursing.

Statistical analysis

The data analysis in this study used the 17th version of the Statistical Software for Social Sciences (SPSS). To enter the analysis, mean scores were calculated for each specific domain using items from the CDI, which covers four distinct care-related domains. Furthermore, the study incorporated predefined thresholds for CDI that were initially outlined in the original investigation and were subsequently utilized in the present study for accurate reporting purposes [20].

Results

The participants were 105 fourth-year nursing students with a mean age of 23.4 years (SD=1.4). Most of the participants were females (n = 80, 76.2%), while males represent (n = 25, 23.8 %) (see Table 1). The participants represented 76% of the fourth-year students, while 640 students were enrolled in all the years.

Table 1 The demographics of the study participants

Level of Psychosocial Care

Fourth-year nursing students showed significantly elevated average scores in the realm of professional and technical care, with a mean score of 4.69 ± 0.25, as indicated in Table 2. A detailed examination of the table demonstrates that all items associated with professional and technical care domains yielded remarkably high mean scores, ranging from (4.39 ± 0.90) to (4.84 ± 0.38).

Table 2 The mean scores and standard deviations of the participants’ responses on the CDI

On the contrary, the average score for psychosocial care practices among participants was recorded at 3.37 (SD = 0.95). This score signifies a relatively lower level of psychosocial care exhibited by the participants compared to their notable achievements in professional and technical care. (see Table 2).

The item with the highest mean score (M=3.76, SD=1.34) was "Providing privacy for a patient." While the item "Keeping relatives informed about a patient" had the lowest mean score (M=2.85, SD=1.20) (see Table 2).

In the context of nursing education in the institution under study, it has been identified that although significant attention is directed toward technical and professional aspects, there is a notable need for nursing students to develop psychosocial competencies prior to graduation. These skills play a crucial role in enhancing students' abilities to apply them in their nursing interventions. Acquiring psychosocial skills equips nursing students with the necessary tools to excel in various dimensions of patient care.

Discussion

The CDI encompasses 12 elements pertaining to psychosocial aspects. This study found that the average scores for this particular aspect were significantly lower than those for the professional and technical aspects. This discrepancy highlights the preferences of nursing students in Jordan for nursing care. The participants appeared to value technical care above psychosocial care. This suggests that their perception of care is molded over the course of their theoretical and practical studies, culminating in the completion of their nursing education. Furthermore, their adoption of professional behaviors is also influenced by their interactions with registered nurses in their field of practice, shaping their professional socialization [26]. Watson and his colleagues [27] also claimed that after finishing nursing education, nursing students tend to lose some of their idealistic views about nursing and caring. Safadi and her colleagues [28] also discussed the theory-practice gap and how student perspectives changed over the course of the educational process. They stressed the importance of updating the Jordanian nursing school curricula and university admission procedures [28].

Fourth-year nursing students are more likely to focus on technical and professional care at the expense of the psychosocial domain [16]. This could be related to a flawed educational system [27]. Students were often asked to do paperwork and assignments focusing on specific course outcomes, such as writing nursing care plans, seminars, and presentations about specific diseases or health conditions. They were also advised to perform specific nursing practices such as measuring vital signs, wound dressing, pre-preparation of medication, intravenous fluid, etc. All of these activities within their daily education and training routine emphasized the professional and technical aspects of care rather than engaging with the client in purposeful communication and spending time with clients for the purpose of the psychosocial aspect of care. This situation is accompanied by an overcrowded training environment owing to the high admission rate and limited hospital beds. Furthermore, the clinical setting in which they trained was a public hospital serving a large population with an extensive demand for services.

Early burnout may be predicted by poor psychosocial CDI item scores of fourth-year nursing students. Burnout has negative effects on academic performance, professional retention, and performance in the workplace [27, 29]. These results were expected with due attention. Previous surveys conducted at the same location revealed that students' satisfaction with the nursing program was indifferent and that one-third of them did not feel a sense of community within the nursing field [16, 30]. In addition, an earlier study conducted in Jordan on the beliefs, attitudes, and perceived practices of newly enrolled students corroborated this [31]. Only 31% of the students who participated in the survey at Jordanian nursing colleges and institutes affiliated with the Ministry of Health expressed a desire to become nurses. However, 69% of people started their nursing careers for other reasons, such as financial constraints from their families or because it was their only option to study [31].

Limitations

This study has some limitations. First, the generalizability of the findings may be limited, because the study was conducted solely at a single university. Another limitation of this study is that the data collection relied on self-reported surveys, which could introduce potential bias due to respondents' tendency to provide socially desirable answers. This study did not assess the quality of psychosocial care provided by nursing students. The impact of psychosocial care on patient outcomes was not assessed in this study. These two limitations present opportunities for future research to explore them in greater depth.

Implications

This study’s findings have several implications for nursing education and practice. First, nursing programs must prioritize the education and training of students in psychosocial care. This may include developing coursework and training programs focused specifically on psychosocial care as well as providing opportunities for hands-on training and simulation exercises.

Second, nursing practice settings must prioritize the provision of high-quality psychosocial care to patients. This may include providing resources and support for nurses to provide psychosocial care effectively as well as encouraging ongoing professional development and engagement with the latest research and best practices related to psychosocial care.

Finally, policymakers and healthcare organizations must prioritize the integration of psychosocial care into healthcare delivery systems. This may include developing policies and procedures that support the provision of psychosocial care as well as providing funding and resources for the training and education of healthcare professionals in this area.

Conclusion

This study reported that nursing students perceive technical care to be more important than psychosocial care. These results indicate that psychosocial care for patients needs to be reoriented at multiple levels. This should include students, nursing schools, their curricula, training settings, clinical instructors, and educators. These nurses need to equip them with the competencies of holistic care for patients and their families, including psychosocial competencies, as a demand for their graduation from nursing programs. This is required at the time of the rapid complexities of healthcare delivery to achieve the essence of the nursing profession as a caring profession.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. International Council of Nurses: Nurses delivering universal health coverage: Stories of excellence from across the world. In. Geneva, Switzerland: ICN - International Council of Nurses; 2021.

  2. The Nursing Process https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/workforce/what-is-nursing/the-nursing-process/.

  3. Semenenko E, Banerjee S, Olver I, Ashinze P. Review of psychological interventions in patients with cancer. Supp Care Cancer. 2023;31(4):210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Priest HM. Helping student nurses to identify and respond to the psychological needs of physically ill patients: implications for curriculum design. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;26(5):423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen CS. Chan SW-C, Chan MF, Yap SF, Wang W, Kowitlawakul Y: Nurses’ Perceptions of Psychosocial Care and Barriers to Its Provision: A Qualitative Study. J Nurs Res. 2017;25(6):411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan S-Y, Lin I-M, Hsieh J-G, Chang C-J. Psychosocial care provided by physicians and nurses in palliative care: A mixed methods study. J Pain Sympt Manage. 2017;53(2):216–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook NF, McCance T, McCormack B, Barr O, Slater P. Perceived caring attributes and priorities of preregistration nursing students throughout a nursing curriculum underpinned by person-centredness. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(13–14):2847–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng Q, Xu B, Ng MSN, Duan Y, So WKW. Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions among caregivers of patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;127: 104162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Terzian T, Watson JM, Miller S. Nursing students’ experiences in providing patient education in the clinical setting. Int J Stud Nurs. 2021;6(4):49.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Azri M, Al-Saidi S, Al-Musilhi J, Al-Mandhari Z, Panchatcharam SM. Knowledge and experiences of final year medical and nursing students with regard to palliative care at government university in Oman: a questionnaire based study. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36:747–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Said NB, Chiang VC. The knowledge, skill competencies, and psychological preparedness of nurses for disasters: a systematic review. Int Emerg Nurs. 2020;48: 100806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Omolola AO, Adesuyi AB, Omolola BT, Kosemani T. Assessment of knowledge of nurses in providing psychosocial care for mothers with sickle cell child in Osun State Nigeria. Babali Nurs Res. 2020;1(1):7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Trinidad MF, Pascual JLG, García MR. Perception of caring among nursing students: Results from a cross-sectional survey. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;83: 104196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mersin S, Demiralp M, Öksüz E. Addressing the psychosocial needs of patients: Challenges for nursing students. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2019;55(2):269–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Students Enroled in Public and Private Universities 2022-2023 http://www.admhec.gov.jo/mjr2017/UnivMajorCapacity.aspx.

  16. Altarawneh FZ, Khamaiseh A. Perception of caring dimensions between first year nursing students and fourth year nursing students at Mut’ah University-Jordan Mu’tah Lil-Buhuth wad-Dirasat. Nat Appl Sci Ser. 2021;36(1):75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baljani E, Azimi N, Hosseinloo A. A survey on nurses’ perception of the importance of caring behaviors and factors affecting its provision. Evid Based Care. 2012;2(1):13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nursalam N, Wijaya A, Bakar A, Efendi F: Indonesian Nursing Students in Caring Behavior. JNHC 2015.

  19. Li YS, Yu WP, Yang BH, Liu CF. A comparison of the caring behaviours of nursing students and registered nurses: implications for nursing education. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(21–22):3317–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alhadidi M: The Caring Dimension Inventory (CDI-29): Modified Arabic Version. International Archives of Nursing and Health Care 2016, 2(3).

  21. Sebold LF, Kempfer SS, Radünz V, Prado MLd, Tourinho FSV, Girondi JBR: Care is... nursing student perceptions: A Heideggerian perspective. Escola Anna Nery 2016, 20(2):243-247.

  22. Petrou A, Sakellari E, Psychogiou M, Karassavidis S, Imbrahim S, Savvidis G, Sapountzi-Krepia D. Nursing students’ perceptions of caring: A qualitative approach. Int J Caring Sci. 2017;10(3):1148–57.

    Google Scholar 

  23. SavvasKarassavidis R. Nursing students’ perceptions of caring: a qualitative approach. Int J Caring Sci. 2017;10(3):1148–57.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knutsson S, Axelsson J, Lindqvist G. An application of the caritative caring approach–nursing students’ experiences of practising caring and uncaring encounters by simulation at a clinical training centre. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2022;17(1):2100610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Watson R, Lea A. The caring dimensions inventory (CDI): content validity, reliability and scaling. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25:87–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gibbon B, Crane J. The impact of ‘missed care’on the professional socialisation of nursing students: A qualitative research study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;66:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Watson R, Ian D. lea A: A longitudinal study into the perceptions of caring and nursing among student nurses. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(5):1228–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Safadi RR, Saleh MYN, Nassar OS, Amre HM, Froelicher ES: Nursing students’ perceptions of nursing: a descriptive study of four cohorts. Int Nurs Rev 2011:7-8.

  29. Rudman A, Gusatavsson P. Burnout during nursing education predicts lower occupational preparedness and future clinical performance: A longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:988–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaradeen N, Jaradat R, Abosafi A, Tarawneh F. Students satisfactions with nursing program Bahrain. Med Bull. 2012;34(1):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jrasat M. Samawi O. Wilson C: beliefs, attitudes and perceived practice among newly enrolled students at the Jordanian ministry of health nursing colleges and institutes Education for health. 2005;18(2):145–56.

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to all the participants in this study.

Funding

No funds to declare. The authors self-funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.A conceptualize the study, A.A. Wrote the proposal and with F.A collected and analysed the data. Bothe authors wrote the main manuscript. A.A reviewed it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad H. Al-Nawafleh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed by the Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Nursing, Mutah University, which granted permission to conduct the study. The study followed the ethical guidelines, protocol, and regulations stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Nawafleh, A.H., Altarawneh, F.Z. Nursing students perspectives of psychosocial care: cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 22, 392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01548-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01548-7

Keywords