Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence of medication errors and its related factors in Iranian nurses: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Nursing volume 23, Article number: 175 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nurses may make medication errors during the implementation of therapeutic interventions, which initially threaten the patient’s health and safety and prolong their hospital stay. These errors have always been a challenge for healthcare systems. Given that factors such as the timing, type, and causes of medication errors can serve as suitable predictors for their occurrence, we have decided to conduct a review study aiming to investigate the prevalence of medication errors and the associated factors among Iranian nurses.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies were searched on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, IranMedex, Magiran, and SID databases using a combination of keywords and Boolean functions. The study that reported the prevalence of medication errors among nurses in Iran without time limitation up to May 2023 was included in this study.

Results

A total of 36 studies were included in the analysis. The analysis indicates that 54% (95% CI: 43, 65; I2 = 99.3%) of Iranian nurses experienced medication errors. The most common types of medication errors by nurses were wrong timing 27.3% (95% CI: 19, 36; I2 = 95.8%), and wrong dosage 26.4% (95% CI: 20, 33; I2 = 91%). Additionally, the main causes of medication errors among nurses were workload 43%, fatigue 42.7%, and nursing shortage 38.8%. In this study, just 39% (95% CI: 27, 50; I2 = 97.1%) of nurses with medication errors did report their errors. Moreover, the prevalence of medication errors was more in the night shift at 41.1%. The results of the meta-regression showed that publication year and the female-to-male ratio are good predictors of medical errors, but they are not statistically significant(p > 0.05).

Conclusions

To reduce medication errors, nurses need to work in a calm environment that allows for proper nursing interventions and prevents overcrowding in departments. Additionally, considering the low reporting of medication errors to managers, support should be provided to nurses who report medication errors, in order to promote a culture of reporting these errors among Iranian nurses and ensure patient safety is not compromised.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Patient safety is considered a crucial issue in today’s world, and it is used as a valuable indicator for controlling the quality of healthcare services provided by healthcare professionals [1,2,3,4]. Despite technological advancements in the healthcare system, medical errors continue to pose a threat to patient safety. For instance, the implementation of electronic systems for medication ordering and recording, as well as the use of automated devices for medication administration and dosage determination, represent some of the technological advancements that can be utilized in this regard [5, 6]. Medical errors are one of the most common hazards in patient care and hospital safety. Approximately 10% of hospitalized patients are confronted with medical errors, and 7% of these errors result in mortality [7]. Medication errors are one of the most common types of medical errors and are classified into five categories by the American Medical Association [8]. These errors include medication errors, errors in conducting laboratory tests, errors in filing, errors in providing services, and errors in response to abnormal results of experimental tests [9]. The annual statistics of mortality due to medical errors indicate that 98,000 individuals die as a result of these errors. Among these cases, 7,000 are solely attributed to medication errors [10].

Medication errors can occur at various stages of the medication prescribing process. However, common medication errors include prescribing the wrong medication, not adhering to the correct timing of medication administration, not following the appropriate route of medication administration, prescribing medication in a dosage exceeding the prescribed order, administering medication to the wrong patient, and miscalculating medication dosages [11,12,13]. Adverse effects resulting from medication errors impose costs equivalent to 11 billion dollars annually on governments [14]. To prevent medication errors, it is important to carefully follow eight principles: ensuring the correct patient, administering the correct drug at the correct time and route, providing the correct dose, accurately documenting, prescribing appropriately, and monitoring the patient’s response to the medication [15].

Administering medication to patients is the primary and important responsibility of nurses, and it is referred to as the main responsibility of nurses. Approximately 40% of nurses’ time in each shift is spent on performing this task, resulting occurrence of medication errors among nurses [16].The reasons for the occurrence of medication errors by nurses can be attributed to rapid advancements in medical technology, existing deficiencies in nursing education, and high public expectations of nurses, which lead to significant stress on nurses and create a conducive environment for errors to occur [17, 18].

The rate of medication errors reported by nurses is significantly lower than reality [19, 20]. In a study conducted in Iran, only 19% of nurses reported their medication errors, which leads to compromised patient safety and increased hospitalization and treatment duration for patients [21]. However, the prevalence of medication errors has significantly increased due to the wide range of medications and the growing number of patients taking multiple drugs, despite the availability of guidelines [22].

Numerous and diverse studies have been conducted on medication errors. The first step in solving a problem is understanding its prevalence and extent. In a recent study conducted by Matin, [23] factors such as the type of medication error, shift occurrence of errors, causes of medication errors, and the impact of the questionnaire used, population size, and number of hospitals on the occurrence of medication errors by nurses were not investigated. Considering that these factors can serve as appropriate predictors for medication errors by nurses in hospital settings for healthcare and medical system managers worldwide, and also considering the numerous related articles published since the publication of a similar article, conducting an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis can be helpful.

Methods

This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis approved by the Research and Technology Committee of the Student Research Center at Sirjan School of Medical Sciences (No: 402,000,004) and has an ethics code from the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research at Sirjan School of Medical Sciences (NO: IR.SIRUMS.REC.1402.004). This study aims to investigate the prevalence of medication errors among Iranian nurses based on published articles in domestic and international journals through a systematic review and meta-analysis approach until the end of May 2023. The present study is designed based on the PRISMA checklist [24].

Two researchers(AB.B, H.F) conducted searches on scientific databases. In this study, national and international databases were searched. These databases included: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, IranMedex, Magiran, and SID. All relevant articles published in Persian or English regarding medication errors among Iranian nurses were searched. Additionally, the references of the final studies were searched to find other related articles. The following keywords were used in combination:(‘medication error(s)’ OR “Drug use error” OR “wrong drug” OR “wrong dose” OR ”prescribing error(s)” OR ‘drug error(s)’ OR ‘medication mistake(s)’ OR “dispensing error“ OR “incorrect drug” OR “incorrect dose” OR “administration error” OR ‘drug mistake (s)’ OR “transcription error” OR “inappropriate prescribing” OR “inappropriate medication”) AND(‘nurse(s)’ OR ‘nursing staff’) AND (‘Iran’ OR ‘Iranian’).

Study selection

The following four inclusion criteria were used: [1] articles published in Persian or English language; [2] articles published from the beginning until May 2023; [3] research conducted in a hospital setting; [4] cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of medication errors among nurses over a lifetime or a period of time. The following two exclusion criteria were used Studies have investigated medication errors among students, physicians, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals. All studies were independently evaluated by two authors(AB.B and H.R) and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consultation with a third author(H.F), if necessary.

Data extraction and quality assessment

In this study, a checklist designed by the authors was used to extract information. The extracted information from each study included: first author, year of publication, year of data collection, gender ratio, language of the study, average age, average work experience, sample size, number of hospitals, number of medication errors, study province, and other relevant information related to medication errors. Two independent researchers extracted data from each article (AB.B and H.R).

We used the critical appraisal checklist developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) to evaluate the quality of the studies included in our research [25]. This checklist is specifically designed for cross-sectional studies and comprises 8 domains. A score of more than 6 indicates high quality, scores ranging from 3 to 6 indicate moderate quality, and scores below 3 represent low-quality studies. It’s important to note that we did not exclude any studies based on their quality score. Two investigators independently assessed the methodological quality of primary studies. In case of uncertainty or disagreement between reviewers, an independent investigator was consulted to reach a consensus (AB.B, F.S and H.F).

Statistical analysis

In the current study, the prevalence of medication errors was obtained as the ratio of nurses who reported their own medication errors to the total number of nurses who experienced medication errors during a specific period or throughout their career. In this study we computed the standard error (SE) of the prevalence of medication errors among nurses and the prevalence of reporting medication error to nurse managers. The I2 (statistical measure that represents the degree of heterogeneity) index was used to assess the heterogeneity of data, which was categorized as low heterogeneity (I2 index < 25%), average heterogeneity (I2 index = 25–75%), and high heterogeneity (I2 index > 75%). Considering the heterogeneity index (I2) which was more than 75%, as well as the significance of Cochran’s Q (p < 0.0001). In this study, data were analyzed using a random effects model due to the high heterogeneity (I2 > 75%) [26, 27]. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of MEs based on factors such as shift work, Type of medication error, cause of MEs Number of error reports, and others. Additionally, meta-regressions were performed based on age, work experience, year of publication, and gender ratio of female to male. Also, Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias and the influence of small studies. STATA software (version 17) was utilized for data analysis.

Result

Initially, we identified a total of 1028 reports, which we then examined for any duplicates and evaluated based on their respective titles and abstracts. Following this review, we excluded any duplicates (453 article) and reduced the number of reports to 575. Next, we further assessed these 575 reports to determine their eligibility, resulting in 150 studies that met our inclusion criteria and underwent a secondary evaluation. Finally, after all, evaluations were complete, we included 36 studies in our final analysis Fig. 1. Reasons for exclusion some study were unrelated topic and unrelated study population.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The PRISMA flow diagram showing the study selection process

Full size image

A total of 36 articles were analyzed in the meta-analysis, encompassing 6,238 participants with an average of 137.28 individuals per study. The largest and smallest sample sizes were reported in studies by Fathi [28] (500 participants) and by Fathi [29] (40 participants), respectively. Table 1 presents the general characteristics of the chosen studies Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristic of the included articles
Full size table

The majority of respondents in our study (73.3% of total respondents) were female, although seven author teams did not report gender of respondents [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. The average age of nurses, based on 25 studies that reported the average age, was determined to be 32.6 years. In addition, the average work experience of nurses was obtained as 7.97 years based on 17 studies reporting the work experience of nurses.

The prevalence of medication errors among nurses in the studies entered ranged from 10% [37]to 100% [38]. According to the results obtained from the random effects method, the prevalence of medication errors among nurses was 54% (95% CI: 43, 65; I2 = 99.3%) Fig. 2. Furthermore, the results showed that 48.5% of nurses experienced medication errors at least once, and 51.5% of them experienced two or more medication errors. According to the random effects model, unfortunately, only 39% (95% CI: 27, 50; I2 = 97.1%) of nurses report their medication errors to nursing managers Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of medication errors in nurses of Iranian hospitals (The rhombus symbol in the figure represents the overall estimate, while the small squares on each study indicate the prevalence of medication errors among nurses, and the dashed lines represent the confidence interval)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

The frequency of medication error reporting among nurses (The rhombus symbol in the figure represents the overall estimate, while the small squares on each study indicate the prevalence of medication error reporting among nurses, and the dashed lines represent the confidence interval)

Full size image

In this study, the most common types of medication errors by nurses were wrong timing, accounting for 27.3% (95% CI: 19, 36; I2 = 95.8%), and wrong dosage, accounting for 26.4% (95% CI: 20, 33; I2 = 91%) Table 2. Additionally, the main causes of medication errors among nurses were workload, accounting for 43%, fatigue, accounting for 42.7%, and nursing shortage, accounting for 38.8%. The results showed that medication errors occurred more frequently during the night shift, accounting for 41%.

Table 2 The prevalence of Medication error according to different variables among Iranian nurses
Full size table

In addition to the mentioned cases, the results have shown that increasing the sample size in studies has led to a reduction in medication errors reported by nurses. Studies with a sample size below 100 participants reported 60% of medication errors, while studies with a sample size above 400 participants reported 17% of medication errors. The prevalence of medication errors decreased with an increase in the number of hospitals examined. Studies that only examined one hospital had a 59.3% prevalence of medication errors, while studies that examined more than five hospitals reported a 32.4% prevalence of medication errors. Articles that had low and moderate quality(45.6% and 62.1%) reported a significantly higher prevalence of medication errors in nurses compared to articles that had high quality(35.2%) Table 2.

The results of the meta-regression indicate a positive linear relationship between the gender ratio (female to male) in nurses and the prevalence of medication errors, as well as the year of publication Table 3. However, the relationship is inverse for the work experience and age of nurses. Fortunately, in our study, the results of sensitivity analysis showed that absence of every single study did not make a significant change in the prevalence of medication errors.

Table 3  Univariate meta-regression results for the prevalence of medication errors among nurses
Full size table

To assess publication bias, funnel plots Egger’s test were employed. Each dot on the funnel plot represents a distinct study, and an uneven distribution provides evidence of publication bias [39]. The effect sizes of the studies were plotted against their standard errors, and the funnel plots were evaluated, which indicated publication bias for the prevalence of MEs as the plot appeared to be asymmetric. Although, the Begg test results (P = 0.733) did not indicate any signs of publication bias, the outcomes of the Egger test (P = 0.00) suggested the presence of such bias Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Funnel plot for assessing the risk of publication bias

Full size image

Discussion

Medication errors are one of the most significant threats to patient safety in healthcare settings. This study was conducted as a systematic review and meta-analysis, and the results demonstrated that more than half of nurses commit medication errors. The study revealed that the prevalence of medication errors among Iranian nurses is 54%. This result is consistent with the results of previous studies in Iran by Sabzi (60%) [31], Farajzadeh (49.6%) [40], and Karamimatin(53%) [23]and higher than the study in Canada by Heyland (37%) [41].Possible reasons for the variations between our study and Heyland’s study may include different inclusion periods, countries, sample sizes, cultural differences, and different teachings. The occurrence of Medication errors is associated with various factors such as gender, age, work experience, hospital ward, and other related factors [42].The reason for the importance of training nurses in reducing medication errors is to enhance patient safety and improve healthcare outcomes. By providing educational programs to nurses, they can acquire the requisite knowledge and skills to proficiently manage medication errors and other medical errors, thereby improving patient safety and healthcare outcomes [43,44,45].

In this study, only 39% of nurses reported their medication errors, which is in line with the findings of a previous systematic review on medication errors among nurses, where only 36% of nurses reported their medication errors to nursing managers. Nurses should report errors to patients, their families, and the care team after making them, as required by professional and ethical standards. In one study [46], fear of hospital authorities was identified as a reason for not reporting nursing errors. In other study [47], nurses were stigmatized as the culprits, and in the other study [1], fear of worsening the situation was identified as a reason for not reporting nursing errors. Nursing managers can encourage nurses to report medication errors by addressing their fears and concerns and implementing management measures such as ensuring nurse anonymity. By informing other nurses, they can prevent the recurrence of errors in the future [48]. The importance of reporting medication errors for nurses should be emphasized. Reporting these errors is not only essential and necessary for enhancing patient safety in hospitals but also in all healthcare settings. Therefore, existing barriers and limitations, especially managerial barriers, should be addressed to create an environment where nurses can report errors [30].

In the field of medication errors, the most common types of errors by nurses are wrong dosage and wrong timing. In one study [32] showed that the majority of medication errors included errors in drug administration timing, drug calculation errors, dosage errors, and injection speed errors. Another study [49] showed that the most common medication errors included wrong dosage, wrong drug, and wrong timing. Due to the various dimensions and methods of investigating medication errors, the occurrence of medication errors in different studies differs from each other. Medication is the most commonly used therapeutic product in clinical settings, therefore, the frequency of its use and the necessity of its administration can increase the occurrence of errors. Furthermore, the results of this systematic review indicate that nurses attribute the highest cause of medication errors to high workload and fatigue. When nurses are confronted with multiple tasks and responsibilities, they may become overwhelmed, compromising their abilities. This can impair their ability to accurately recall medication orders and lead to errors. Nurses often work in fast-paced and time-sensitive environments. The workload pressure on nurses can result in rushing through tasks, which can contribute to errors in dosage or drug identification [50, 51].

According to the work schedule, the highest rate of medication errors occurs during the night shift. Previous studies have also confirmed these results. In fact, sleep deprivation reduces concentration and leads to an increase in errors among nurses [49, 52]. In addition, during night shifts, the occurrence of medication errors increases due to environmental factors such as reduced ambient lighting, shortage of nurses on night shifts, and fatigue and sleep deprivation [53]. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that with an increase in sample size and the number of hospitals under investigation, the occurrence of errors decreases. Increasing the sample size addresses the bias caused by a small sample size, resulting in results that are closer to reality. In other words, with an increase in sample size, individuals from different age groups, genders, and occupational groups are present [54].

The results of the regression analysis in this study demonstrated that increasing age and work experience are associated with a decrease in medication errors. Younger nurses with less work experience are more prone to medication errors due to lower practical skills, limited experience in high-pressure environments, high job stress in the early years of their careers, and higher workload compared to more experienced nurses in Iran [4, 6]. Older nurses, on the other hand, possess higher levels of skill and extensive experience, often assuming managerial roles and having less direct contact with patients and medical devices, which reduces the occurrence of errors in their practice [55]. Another part of the regression analysis results indicates that women report a higher proportion of medication errors compared to men, which is consistent with the findings [23].

The results of the funnel plot showed asymmetry in the published results, which was confirmed by the Egger test. It should also be noted that the present study only examined observational studies and relied on self-reporting, which may differ from actual results. This review study has some limitations that need to be considered for publication in scientific journals. Our study only examined Iranian nurses and did not include other nurses from different countries or other healthcare workers, which makes it impossible to generalize the results. Furthermore, our study does not have the ability to identify the causes of medication errors, the outcomes of medication errors, and events following medication errors.

Implications for research and practice

This study demonstrates that the prevalence of medication errors in Iran is significantly high, underscoring the importance of identifying predictive factors for medication errors [56]. Therefore, further research is needed to uncover the underlying causes of medication errors among Iranian nurses, particularly in relation to workload, fatigue, and nurse shortages. Identifying the root causes of these errors can aid in the development of targeted interventions to prevent them. Additionally, future studies should focus on interventions aimed at reducing medication errors among nurses, such as implementing medication safety protocols, providing adequate training and support, and promoting a culture of error reporting without fear of consequences [57]. To achieve this, healthcare systems in Iran must prioritize creating a safe and supportive work environment for nurses with sufficient staffing levels and resources to prevent medication errors [58].

Conclusions

In this systematic review, we have found that more than half of Iranian nurses suffer from medication errors, and most nurses who experience medication errors do not report their errors to nursing managers. Hospital administrators should provide a calm and stress-free environment to reduce medication errors and alleviate the busyness of hospital wards and nurses’ workload. Additionally, hospital administrators should support nurses who report their errors and implement appropriate measures for key factors contributing to errors, such as night shifts.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Farzi S, Farzi S, Alimohammadi N, Moladoost A. Medication errors by the intensive care units’ nurses and the preventive strategies. Anesthesiology Pain. 2016;6(4):33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manias E, Cranswick N, Newall F, Rosenfeld E, Weiner C, Williams A, et al. Medication error trends and effects of person-related, environment‐related and communication‐related factors on medication errors in a paediatric hospital. J Paediatr Child Health. 2019;55(3):320–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barani M, Fathizadeh H, Arkaban H, Kalantar-Neyestanaki D, Akbarizadeh MR, Turki Jalil A, et al. Recent advances in nanotechnology for the management of Klebsiella pneumoniae–related infections. Biosensors. 2022;12(12):1155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Abadiga M, Mosisa G, Abate Y. Magnitude of needlestick and sharp injury and its associated factors among nurses working at health institutions in Western Ethiopia, 2020. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 2020:1589– 602.

  5. Zabihirad J, Mojdeh S, Shahriari M. Nurse’s perioperative care errors and related factors in the operating room. Electron J Gen Med. 2019;16(2).

  6. Biojmajd AR, Khajoei R, Balvardi M, Imani-Goghary Z, Izad-Abadi Z. Frequency of Needle Wound Injury (Needle-stick) and its related factors in nursing staff in Sirjan in 2020. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2023;25(4).

  7. Forum NQ. Safe practices for better healthcare-2010 update: a consensus report. Washington, DC: NFQ; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Di Simone E, Fabbian F, Giannetta N, Dionisi S, Renzi E, Cappadona R, et al. Risk of medication errors and nurses’ quality of sleep: a national cross-sectional web survey study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(12):7058–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Young RA, Fulda KG, Espinoza A, Gurses AP, Hendrix ZN, Kenny T, et al. Ambulatory medication safety in primary care: a systematic review. J Am Board Family Med. 2022;35(3):610–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mwavu DM. Medication errors among patients admitted with Cardiovascular disorders at the critical care unit of Kenyatta. National Hospital: Uon; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yin HS, Neuspiel DR, Paul IM, Franklin W, Tieder JS, Adirim T, et al. Preventing home medication administration errors. Pediatrics. 2021;148(6):e2021054666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Westbrook JI, Li L, Raban MZ, Woods A, Koyama AK, Baysari MT, et al. Associations between double-checking and medication administration errors: a direct observational study of paediatric inpatients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(4):320–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aston J, Wilson KA, Terry DR. The treatment-related experiences of parents, children and young people with regular prescribed medication. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41:113–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ologunde O, Ohaeri B, Ojo I, Babarimisa O. Medical errors: the impact and way out. International Journal of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences; 2022.

  15. Nikpeyma N, Gholamnejad H. Reasons for medication errors in nurses’ veiws. Adv Nurs Midwifery. 2009;18(64):16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammadfam I, Movafagh M, Bashirian S. Comparison of standardized plant analysis risk human reliability analysis (SPAR-H) and cognitive reliability error analysis methods (CREAM) in quantifying human error in nursing practice. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(3):401–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shahrokhi A, Ebrahimpour F, Ghodousi A. Factors effective on medication errors: a nursing view. J Res Pharm Pract. 2013;2(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fathizadeh H, Alirezaie Z, Saeed F, Saeed B, Gharibi Z, Biojmajd AR. Prevalence of needle stick and its related factors in Iranian health worker: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. 2023.

  19. Wondmieneh A, Alemu W, Tadele N, Demis A. Medication administration errors and contributing factors among nurses: a cross sectional study in tertiary hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2020;19(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Levine KJ, Carmody M, Silk KJ. The influence of organizational culture, climate and commitment on speaking up about medical errors. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2020;28(1):130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dashti Z, Mozaffari N, Shamshiri M, Mohammadi M. Medication errors and its reporting by nurses of intensive care units of ardabil in 2017. J Health Care. 2019;21(3):184–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alqenae FA, Steinke D, Keers RN. Prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm following discharge from hospital to community settings: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2020;43:517–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Matin BK, Hajizadeh M, Nouri B, Rezaeian S, Mohammadi M, Rezaei S. Period prevalence and reporting rate of medication errors among nurses in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2018;26(5):498–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group* P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Santos WMd, Secoli SR, Püschel VAA. The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic reviews. Rev Latinoam Enferm. 2018;26:e3074.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sayemiri K, Tavan H, Shohani M, Valizadeh R. Forms of self-immolation in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2021;15(1).

  27. Sayehmiri K, Shohani M, Kalvandi G, Najafi R, Tavan H. Biochemical parameters of rickets in Iranian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Res Med Sciences: Official J Isfahan Univ Med Sci. 2019;24.

  28. Fathi A, Hajizadeh M, Moradi K, Zandian H, Dezhkameh M, Kazemzadeh S et al. Medication errors among nurses in teaching hospitals in the west of Iran: what we need to know about prevalence, types, and barriers to reporting. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39.

  29. Fathi A, Rezaei MH, Mohammadi M, Azam K, Barzegar L, Headarnezhad N, et al. Survey of medication error by nurses self-report in intensive care unit of Imam Khomeini Hospital-Tehran. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci. 2014;8:1726–32.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ghorbanpour Diz M, Mohammad khan Kermanshahi S, Sedaghat M. Evaluation of self-report of the medication errors and its barriers in pediatric wards. J Pediatr Nurs. 2016;3(1):71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sabzi Z, Mohammadi R, Talebi R, Roshandel GR. Medication errors and their relationship with care complexity and work dynamics. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci. 2019;7(21):3579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramazani T, Hosseini Almadvari S, Fallahzadeh H, Dehghani Tafti A. Type and rate of medication errors and their causes from the perspectives of neonatal and neonatal intensive care units nurses in Yazd hospitals, 2014. Community Health J. 2017;10(1):63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taheri E, Nourian M, Rasouli M, Kavousi A. The study of type and amount of medication errors in neonatal intensive care units and neonatal units. 2013.

  34. Saremi M, Fallah MR. Subjective fatigue and medical errors among nurses in an educational hospital. Iran Occup Health. 2013;10(4):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zaree TY, Nazari J, Jafarabadi MA, Alinia T. Impact of psychosocial factors on occurrence of medication errors among Tehran public hospitals nurses by evaluating the balance between effort and reward. Saf Health work. 2018;9(4):447–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Salmani N, Fallah Tafti B. Frequency, type and causes of medication errors in pediatric wards of hospitals in Yazd, the Central of Iran. Int J Pediatr. 2016;4(9):3475–87.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Piroozi B, Mohamadi-Bolbanabad A, Safari H, Amerzadeh M, Moradi G, Usefi D, et al. Frequency and potential causes of medication errors from nurses’ viewpoint in hospitals affiliated to a medical sciences University in Iran. Int J Hum Rights Healthc. 2019;12(4):267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahangarzadeh Rezaei S, Bagaei R, Feizi A, Rahimi F. A survy on the nursing-related factors influencing medication error incidence. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2014;12(12):1088–93.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Egger M, Schneider M, Smith GD. Meta-analysis spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 1998;316(7125):140–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Farajzadeh M, Ghanei R, Dalvand S, Sarkawt Ghawsi S, Mohammadzadeh M, Reshadi H. Medication errors in nurses of Imam Khomeini hospital of Saghez and its related factors. Iran J Rehabilitation Res. 2018;4(4):10–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Heyland DK, Ilan R, Jiang X, You JJ, Dodek P. The prevalence of medical error related to end-of-life communication in Canadian hospitals: results of a multicentre observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(9):671–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dehvan F, Dehkordi AH, Gheshlagh RG, Kurdi A. The prevalence of medication errors among nursing students: a systematic and meta-analysis study. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12.

  43. Tshiamo WB, Kgositau M, Ntsayagae E, Sabone MB. The role of nursing education in preventing medication errors in Botswana. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2015;3:18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Weant KA, Bailey AM, Baker SN. Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department. Open Access Emerg Med. 2014:45–55.

  45. Jaam M, Naseralallah LM, Hussain TA, Pawluk SA. Pharmacist-led educational interventions provided to healthcare providers to reduce medication errors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(6):e0253588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hesari B, Ghodsi H, Hoseinabadi M, Chenarani H, Ghodsi A. A survey of nurses’ perceptions of the causes of medication errors and barriers to reporting in hospitals affiliated to Neyshabur university of medical sciences, Iran. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2014;21(1):105–11.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Baloochi Beydokhti T, MohammadPour A, Shabab S, Nakhaee H. Related factors of medication errors and barriers of their reporting in the medical staff in hospitals of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences. Q Horiz Med Sci. 2014;19:289–95.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mirzaei M, Khatony A, Faramani RS, Sepahvand E, Prevalence. Types of medication errors and barriers to reporting errors by nurses in an Educational Hospital in Kermanshah. Hayat. 2013;19(3).

  49. Bagheri I, Salmani N, Mandegari Z, Pakcheshm B, Dadgari A. Evaluation of medication errors from the perspective of nurses in the ICUs of Yazd City. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences; 2021.

  50. Bolandianbafghi S, Salimi T, Rassouli M, Faraji R, Sarebanhassanabadi M. Correlation between medication errors with job satisfaction and fatigue of nurses. Electron Physician. 2017;9(8):5142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Saleh AM, Awadalla NJ, El-masri YM, Sleem WF. Impacts of nurses’ circadian rhythm sleep disorders, fatigue, and depression on medication administration errors. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberculosis. 2014;63(1):145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Salmani N, Hasanvand S. Evaluation of the frequency and type of medication prescribing errors in the NICU of hospitals in Yazd. Hayat. 2016;21(4):53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Aljuaid M, Alajman N, Alsafadi A, Alnajjar F, Alshaikh M. Medication error during the day and night shift on weekdays and weekends: a single Teaching Hospital experience in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:2571–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Marshall B, Cardon P, Poddar A, Fontenot R. Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. J Comput Inform Syst. 2013;54(1):11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Saha S, Makkar HS, Sukumaran VB, Murthy CR. On the relationship between mean absolute error and age of incorrect information in the estimation of a piecewise linear signal over noisy channels. IEEE Commun Lett. 2022;26(11):2576–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fathizadeh H, Alirezaie Z, Saeed F, Saeed B, Gharibi Z, Biojmajd AR. Prevalence of needle stick and its related factors in Iranian health worker: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2023;13:04104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Roumeliotis N, Sniderman J, Adams-Webber T, Addo N, Anand V, Rochon P, et al. Effect of electronic prescribing strategies on medication error and harm in hospital: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:2210–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Khammarnia M, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Setoodehzadeh F, Rezaei K, Clark C, Peyvand M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the medical error rate in Iran: 2005–2019. Qual Manage Healthc. 2021;30(3):166–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cheraghi MA, Nikbakhat Nasabadi AR, Mohammad Nejad E, Salari A, Ehsani Kouhi Kheyli SR. Medication errors among nurses in intensive care units (ICU). J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2011;20(1):115–9.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pournamdar Z, Zare S. The evaluation of the rate and the type of medication errors among nurses. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2016;9:102–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheragi MA, Manoocheri H, Mohammadnejad E, Ehsani SR. Types and causes of medication errors from nurse’s viewpoint. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(3):228.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Miladinia M, Zarea K, Baraz S, MOUSAVI NE, Pishgooie AH, GHOLAMZADEH BM. PEDIATRIC NURSES’MEDICATION ERROR: THE SELF-REPORTING OF FREQUENCY, TYPES AND CAUSES. 2016.

  63. MohammadNejad E, Ehsani SR, Salari A, Sajjadi A, HajiesmaeelPour A. Refusal in reporting medication errors from the perspective of nurses in emergency ward. J Res Dev Nurs Midwifery. 2013;10(1):61–8.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shams SH, Bagherieh F, Feizi A, Baghaei R, Hashemlo L, FREQUENCY OF MEDICATION ERRORS, AND ITS REPORTING ACCORDING TO SELF- REPORT BY NURSES IN HOSPITALS OF KHOY CITY. Nurs Midwifery J. 2012;10(5):0.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Musarezaie A, Ghasemi TMG, Zargham-Boroujeni A, Haj-Salhehi E. Survey of the medication errors and refusal to report medication errors from the viewpoints of nurses in hospitals affiliated to Isfahan university of medical sciences, Iran. J Health Syst Res. 2013;9(1):76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ebrahimpour F, Shahrokhi A, Ghodousi A. Patients’ safety and nurses’ medication administration errors. Iran J Forensic Med. 2014;20(4):401–8.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gholipour K, Mashallahi A, Amiri S, Moradi Y, Moghaddam A, Hoorijani F. Prevalence and cause of common medication administration errors in nursing. J Chem Pharm Sci. 2016;2016:18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mosakazemi SZ, Bastani P, Marzaleh MA, Peyravi MR. A survey on the frequency of medication errors caused due to look-alike drugs in the emergency department of the educational hospitals of Shiraz, Iran, 2016. Iran J Health Saf Environ. 2019;6(1):1167–74.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Geravandi S, Adhami Moghaddam F, Sahebalzamani M, Javad Mohammadi M. Refusing to Report the Medication Errors and It’s Effects on Patient’s Safety in Razi Teaching Hospital during 2014–2015. Archives Hygiene Sci. 2016;5(3).

  70. Mirzaei-Alavijeh M, Jalilian F, Karami-Matin B, Ghaderi A, Mahboubi M, Janizadeh R, et al. Needle-stick and medication errors in emergency nurses are due to their job stresses? A descriptive study in Kermanshah Hospitals, Iran. J Biol Today’s World. 2014;3(3):185–8.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Dehvan F, Nobahar M, Razavi MR, Ghorbani R. Assessment of medication errors and factors affecting its occurrence in intensive critical care units of Semnan city hospitals. J Iran Soc Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2015;37:172–81.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Soori S, Rostami Z, Aghilidehkordi G. Occurrence and reporting of nurses’ medication errors in a teaching hospital in Isfahan. J Health Adm. 2019;21(74):75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sarhadi M, Abdollhyar A, Navidian A, Sheikh Bardsiri H, Sarhadi T. The investment of effective factors on medical errors and non-reporting from nurse’s perspective. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci. 2015;22(1):132–42.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Derikvand M, Imanifar N, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPIRITUAL INTELLIGENCE AND, NURSES’VIEWPOINTS ON, REPORTING MEDICATION ERRORS IN KHORAM ABAD’S EDUCATIONAL HOSPITALS 2017. Nurs Midwifery J. 2018;16(3):198–206.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Penjvini S. Investigation of the rate and type of medication errors of nurses in Sanandaj hospitals. 2006.

  76. Ghanadi K, Anbari K, Roham M. Main factor affecting on incidence in medication errors among nurses in Ashayer’s hospital in, Khoram Abad. Aflak; 2010. pp. 1–8.

  77. Ghobadi A, Hajibabaee F, Emamzadeh Ghasemi HS, Hajrajabi A, Aryamloo P. The components of nursing error reporting in selected hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2020. Iran J Nurs. 2022;35(138):374–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is the result of a research project approved by the Research Council of the Student Research and Technology Committee of Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, and it has been carried out with the financial support of the Research and Technology Committee of this School (NO: 02S01). This study is dedicated to all soldiers who sacrificed their lives to keep their countries safe.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Student Research Committee of Sirjan School of Medical Sciences (NO: 02S01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laboratory Sciences, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran

    Hadis Fathizadeh

  2. Student Research Committee, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran

    Samaneh-Sadat Mousavi & Hamidreza Rezaeipour

  3. Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

    Zahra Gharibi

  4. Department of Nursing, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran

    Abdol-Rahim Biojmajd

Authors
  1. Hadis Fathizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samaneh-Sadat Mousavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zahra Gharibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hamidreza Rezaeipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdol-Rahim Biojmajd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AB.B and H.F designed this study; AB.B and H.F ran the search strategy; AB.B, SS.M and H.R selected articles and extracted data; AB.B, H.F and H.R evaluate the quality of the evidence. AB.B and H.F wrote the manuscript, and H.R, Z.G, and SS.M edited it. All listed authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdol-Rahim Biojmajd.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has an ethics code from the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research at Sirjan School of Medical Sciences (NO: IR.SIRUMS.REC.1402.004).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fathizadeh, H., Mousavi, SS., Gharibi, Z. et al. Prevalence of medication errors and its related factors in Iranian nurses: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs 23, 175 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01836-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01836-w

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us