Skip to main content

Exploring nurses' experiences of social media and in-person educational interventions for professional development: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background

Nurses play an important role in health promotion, prevention strategies, and care. Therefore, nurses need to obtain and update their knowledge and skills via appropriate strategies. This study aimed to explore nurses’ experiences of receiving social media and in-person education to integrate the findings into practice.

Methods

This was a qualitative study using the directed content analysis approach. A sample of nurses with previous experiences of receiving social media and in-person education participated in the study. They were asked to express their experiences and indicate their preferences. The data were collected based on individual semi-structured interviews.

Results

In total 15 participants took part in the study with a mean age of 40.6 ± 8.93 years and work experiences of 15.3 ± 9.21 years. During the process of content analysis, three main themes emerged: Approaches to nursing education and its adoption in the health system, Achieving effectiveness and efficiency in nursing education, and Health care policy and facilitating pathways for nursing education. Participants indicated several barriers to attending an educational program, including motivation, workload, time and place, and hospital politics.

Conclusion

Overall the findings suggest that regardless of any methods of education nurses cannot actively engage in the educational interventions while on duty. However, the findings suggest that nurses believe that the social media approach might be superior in reducing barriers and making the educational interventions work better.

Peer Review reports

Background

As the most important part of the health system employing a comprehensive health approach, nurses significantly affect the effectiveness of the healthcare system and play an important role in the promotion of health, prevention of diseases, and treatment and care [1]. This issue is in favor of individuals, societies, and populations in the healthcare center. The importance of the role of nurses in investments in the healthcare area and the improvement of economic growth of communities is undeniable [2]. Thus, focusing on developing the professional knowledge and skills of the nursing workforce is very important.

Professional development that involves training during working hours or beyond is an important issue for nursing personnel [3]. Approximately 90% of the universal health care is provided by nurses [4, 5], so the professional development of nurses can be useful in patient care, the efficiency of organizations, and the promotion of nurses [6]. As such implementing educational programs for nursing personnel during working hours or out-of-hours are essential. Different strategies have been employed to implement professional development through educational programs using electronic (mobile, message, website), and in-person (lectures, role-playing) education methods.

An education method comprises the principles and methods used to enable learning in the learner. For a particular education method to be appropriate and efficient, it has to be relevant to the characteristics of the learner and the type of learning it is supposed to bring about [7]. Researchers of face-to-face or in-person education argued that effective action requires more than learning new tools and techniques, and must also include exploration of the theories and values which underpin facilitation practice [8]. The focus should also be on the personal qualities and attendance that facilitators bring to the group [8, 9]. Some studies have shown that educational programs based on social media might be more helpful compared to other forms of education [10, 11].

Rapid and innovative advances in participative Internet communications referred to as “social media,” offer opportunities for modifying health behavior. People of all demographics are adopting these technologies whether on their computers or through mobile devices and they are increasingly using these social media for health-related issues. Although social media have considerable potential as tools for health promotion and education, these media, like traditional health promotion media, require careful application and may not always achieve their desired outcomes [12]. Some studies show social media intervention has been successful in the management of low back pain [13,14,15], Type 2 Diabetes [16], self-efficacy [17]. Social media can support nurses in numerous ways on a personal level. Moorehead et al. highlighted several such as, increased number of interactions with others, shared and custom health content, access and availability of health information, and peer and social support [18].

Social media includes different online tools and some have been used in health promotion, such as Web Logs, Websites, Message boards, Short message services, Social networking sites, etc. [12]. As technology is rapidly changing, so is pedagogy within nursing education. In recent years, using the flexibility of the Internet provides a good opportunity to extend scientific content and enhance learning in general [19]. A qualitative study on the consequences and factors affecting work-related low back pain in nurses found that nurses could not attend the educational program continuously based on a variety of causes, such as a heavy workload, lack of time, or lack of staff [20]. It seems nursing personnel is among those who could benefit from social media including website, app given that they have growing educational needs and skills and at the same time they are dealing with overloading tasks scheduling [21].

The PRECEDE–PROCEED model is often used in health education and health promotion. This model is a cost–benefit evaluation framework proposed in 1974 by Lawrence W. Green that can help health program planners, policymakers, and other evaluators, analyze situations and design health programs efficiently [22]. Based on the study by Green and Kreuter, analyzing situations and designing and implementing educational programs efficiently can be classified in enabling factors and administrative and policy diagnoses. Enabling factors are those characteristics of the environment that facilitate action and any skill or resource required to attain specific behavior [23]. They include programs, services, availability and accessibility of resources, or new skills required to enable behavior change. The administrative and policy diagnosis phase focuses on the administrative and organizational concerns that must be addressed before program implementation. This includes assessment of resources, development, and allocation of budgets, looking at organizational barriers, and coordination of the program with other departments, including external organizations and the community [24].

In this study, we intend to explain the advantages and disadvantages of the two educational approaches. In other words, we construed and explained the presentation of educational content or intervention via two approaches of in-person and social media from the perspective of nurses based on PRECEDE model. As well, we construed the governing policies in our country hospital in facilitating the provision of education through two approaches.

Because education plays an important role in nurses’ career advancement, the present study aimed to identify and explore nurses’ experiences of two approaches of education (social media such as website, App, and in-person education) using a qualitative method.

The study sought to answer the following questions:

Which educational approach do nurses prefer? Why?

Which educational approach is more appropriate and effective?

Which approach is in line with hospital policies?

Methods

Study design

As part of a trial [25], a qualitative study was conducted to explore nurses' experiences of social media and in-person education approaches. The study used the directed content analysis approach. The goal of a directed content analysis approach is to validate or extend conceptually a theoretical framework or theory [26]. Existing theory or research can help focus the research question and it can help researchers begin by identifying key concepts or variables as initial coding categories. This approach was employed by Hsieh and Shannon in 2005 [27]. Content analysis using the directed approach employs a more structured process than in a conventional approach [28]. As such it is appropriate to use existing theories or prior investigations about the phenomenon under study.

Participants

Participants included nurses working at relevant hospitals. Inclusion criteria were: at least one year of work experience in nursing, previous experience of receiving social media, and in-person education. The study was approved by Tarbiat Modares University of Ethics Committee for Health Research Ethics (IR. TUM. REC. 2017/545), and all participants provided written consent. As well as, the researcher reminded commitment to ethics in research, such as secrecy, preservation of anonymity, permission to leave the study, and interruption of the interview if desired.

Data collection

The data were collected based on individual semi-structured interviews [29, 30]. The Interviewees in this study were nursing personnel. The recruitment of participants for the interviews was based on purposive sampling. Decisions regarding the number of individual interviews were determined by data saturation [31]. The original interviews were conducted by the main researcher (SSK) between August 2017 and March 2018 and lasted between 35 to 50 min. All the interviews were conducted in a private room. In the first, the researcher explained the study goals and reasons for doing the research to the participants. To ensure consistency, each interview followed the same semi-structured format, using an interview schedule consisting of open questions, all interviews were recorded and transcribed. The interview guide consisted of open-ended questions based on subcategories of the enabling, administrative, and policy factors of PRECEDE model to allow respondents to fully explain their own experiences. The questions such as "What do you think about social media and in-person education approaches?/ Which approach is in line with hospital policies?" Likewise, they were asked to express their experiences and indicate their preferences.

Data analysis

The study used the directed content analysis approach. The data analysis process was carried out simultaneously by collecting data [32]. Semi-structured interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, the transcript read several times, and parts of the text highlighted, that were relevant to the study goals. The highlighted passages were broken up into semantic units. Then investigators identified meaning-units from each transcript and performed initial coding according to the participants' phrases. Any text that could not be categorized with the initial coding scheme was given a new code. Initial codes were identified by at least two co-investigators, and codes were then categorized according to similarities and differences [31]. An initial analysis created 20 excerpts (sections of text). The data were independently coded by another researcher with in-depth knowledge to explore consistency. The second researcher also created 22 extracts. Transcripts, codes, and categories were read several times by various members of the research group to exhaust identifiable major themes. During this process, data were reduced from text to codes and categories. Based on the type and breadth of a category, researchers identified subcategories with subsequent analysis. When the coding assignments were done for both researchers, have reviewed the three assigned codes from expected outcomes, such as presentation and adoption of education, effectiveness, and efficiency of education, policymaking, and facilitators for education. All coding steps for interview passages were also managed using the MAXQDA 10 editing software.

Validation

The evaluation criteria for establishing the trustworthiness of qualitative data were also considered [28]. There was constant comparison within and across categories and across interviews where each code or category was checked against the rest of the data to establish and refine categories that reflected the nuances of the data [33].

Credibility is the equivalent of internal validity in quantitative research and is concerned with the aspect of truth-value. One of the strategies to ensure credibility is member checking [34, 35]. All transcripts of the interviews were sent to the participants for feedback. Further, halfway through the study period, a meeting was held with those who had participated in the interviews, they corrected the ‘wrong’ interpretation.

Dependability, related to reliability in quantitative terms, occurs when another researcher can follow the decision trail used by the researcher [36]. The text of the interviews, the relevant codes, and the emerged themes were sent to two researchers outside the study who were familiar with qualitative research. Outside researchers examined the research process and the data analysis to ensure the findings were consistent and could be repetitive. Then their complimentary comments were used in the analysis of the data. Further, at a meeting, we discussed the interpretation and presentation of the research findings of uncomplimentary until achieved a common result. As well, we used peers to participate in the analysis process to enhance the original findings.

Confirmability that the findings were based on participants’ responses and there were not any potential bias or personal motivations of the researcher [34]. We have tried to use the participants’ narratives and words rather than potential researcher biases. To establish confirmability, the researcher provided an audit trail, which highlighted every step of data analysis that was made to provide a rationale for the decisions made. This helped establish that the research study’s findings accurately portrayed participants’ responses.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

The original data collection comprised a series of interviews with a sample of 15 project participants. Most were female (n = 11) and their age ranged from 27 to 52 years old (40.6 ± 8.9). They have been employed as a nurse for at least one year (15.33 ± 9.2 years). Participants included nurses working in hospitals affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. The characteristics of participants are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the participants in In-depth interviews

Themes, categories, sub-categories

The study obtained 3 themes, 9 categories, and 22 sub-categories (Tables 2, 3).

Table 2 The process of formation codes and sub-themes
Table 3 The process of formation sub-themes, themes, and main themes

Approaches to nursing education and its adoption in the health system.

Nurses acknowledged that most of the time, in-person education is not provided by an education specialist. So, this theme was derived from performing the program by the staff working in the hospitals, such as the educational supervisor, head nurse, or different sectors' nurses. In this case participant 4 (head nurse, age range 50–60) said:

Some of the time, education is provided by the staff or nurses. The supervisor teaches head nurses and the head nurse educates sector nurses in the form of a category education to the category. Since different departments need to have internal education, some education will be provided by nurses of the same department as a conference. But due to the bustling ward and a large number of patients, not all colleagues can attend the training at the same time. If education is implemented through the app or social media, then there is no need to provide education by nurses or other staff.

Achieving effectiveness and efficiency in nursing education: refers to whether or not a specific set of resources has a positive effect on achievement and, if so, how large this effect is. This main theme was extracted from three sub-categories as follows:

- Skill Learning: The effect of education on increasing knowledge, practice, and skill was identified, and the role of practical education in promoting behavior skills was emphasized. In this regard, participant 3 (nurse, age range 20–30) said:

“The system thinks in-person education is better than social media. Because in-person education can provide practical examples, nurses can ask questions and issues related to the subject of education. Also, pre-test and post-tests are taken in an in-person education, and the nurse's performance is evaluated. While the system can be designed for education via social media in such a way that contains educational videos practical examples in the form of videos, photos, animations, etc. And the educational supervisor monitor how many percentages of the staff used the program and training. As well, evaluate our knowledge and performance through the website."

- Interactivity in education: Interactivity in learning is viewed as a socio-constructivist process and can be communicated among content and participants [37]. Most participants had referred to interactivity in In-person education because In-person education can prepare an adequate situation to ask questions and stimulate communication between participants. Since nurses have received educational content via CD or pdf files sometimes, they thought education via social media is one-way and interactive communication is not possible. So participants emphasized two-way communication in education and its interactive social media. Participant 15 (nurse, age range 40–50) said:

“When staff gets together, it is very good. Because they can be exchanging ideas. Also, there are a lot of questions for each of us, and maybe at that moment don't work the memory to ask. Persons can be actively participation in education and do some practical work. But I think in interactive social media, we can talk and express our opinions."

- Remembrance for restoring of information:

One of the nurses' concerns was the oblivion of the content learned over time. Most participants believed that an appropriate education program should be repeated over time, otherwise it will be forgotten. In this regard, participant 1 (nurse, age range 50–60) said:

"One of the disadvantages of in-person education is receiving little information and content and it only is at one time and the information learned does not repeat over time. Thus, the content learned will be forgotten. But I think one of the benefits of education through the app or social media is receiving a lot of information and content at different times, and also reminding and repeating the content. If we forget about it over time, we can refer to the app."

Health care policy and facilitating pathways for nursing education.

This theme was extracted from five sub-categories as follows:

- The importance of motivation in education:

Considering that educational programs are part of hospital accreditation measures, lack of motivation, and disinterest by nurses, also lack of support and reward by managers prevent nurses from participating in face-to-face education. Thus, these factors lead to not attending the class on time, leaving the class out earlier, lack of taking notes, and not paying attention to education. Participant 5 (nurse, age range 30–40) on the role of material and spiritual motivation said:

"If the education program is out of work hours, nurses don't like in-person education and prefer to receive training virtually. Because the time of education will not be considered as a part of our overtime hours. The encouragement certificate for work promotion was not considered. While the certificate can have a positive impact on the annual performance appraisal."

- The time limit for easy educational access:

Getting easier to access education and having no time limits are basic nurses’ rights. But based on the analysis obtaining in-person education and its access was less possible for nurses. In this regard, participant 9 (nurse, age range 20–30) said:

“When only one date is set for an educational program, maybe we can't attend. For example, perhaps there were many patients at the same time and there aren't many nurses in the sector. Certainly, we cannot participate in education. It is better to set a few dates for an education topic so that nurses can participate in different dates or send via social media. In this way, we can read the contents when the unit is not crowded or at rest time. "

Participant 11 (nurse, age range 30–40) said:

"I think the advantage of social media is most people can access this type of education and share information. We can use this program whenever we want, and we don't have to go to the hospital from home. There is no time and space limit. Even at rest, at work and home, at any time of day, we can use this type of education. We can also have access to a lot of educational content."

- Lack of staff: Most participants referred to the lack of staff in different sectors. They said these factors lead to working pressure. Working pressure and high workloads are seen as the main barriers to attending in-person education programs. Therefore, nurses didn't have enough time to attend in-person education and expressed their tendency to use educational programs based on social media. In this case, participant 2 (nurse, age range 30–40) said:

"We are faced with a lack of staff. So that one person should work instead of two or three persons. Thus, the load of our work is very high, and we have to tolerate a lot of pressure."

- Lack of funding for education:

Data analysis found one of the barriers to in-person education is the cost of education implementation. Thus, one of the most important concerns of education executives is the financing of education costs (such as the payment of the educator, catering fees, educational equipment, and adequate space for education). Participant 6 (nurse, age range 30–40) said:

"One of our educational problems is a lack of funds. The hospital's operating personnel says you should find a sponsor for the educational program. In-person education is economically not desirable because of the commute and payment to the educator. But education through social media is just an app that's installed on the mobile phone and does not require commuting, educator fees, or catering, even it has not needed a place for education."

- Program Failure over time:

The data showed some factors that lead to program failures over time. Such as lack of suitable education space, lack of proper education, no having trainer or educator. In this regard, participant 13 (nurse, age range 30–40) said:

"Perhaps faculty members educated their students in the hospital and not at college or maybe there was a retraining class. So the educational supervisor will coordinate with the unit of education a few days before the education. But, sometimes the education program maybe to be canceled due to a lack of appropriate location or space."

Discussion

Regarding the decisive role of the educational method in nursing education, this study aimed to explore nurses' experiences of the education methods context based on the in-person and social media methods through a qualitative study. The findings from this survey indicated due to the nature of the nurses' work, the educational methods and easy access to education can be a considerable role in nurses' education, particularly in promoting professional and occupational skills.

One of the main themes extracted was "Approaches to nursing education and its adoption in the health system" i.e. the educational program performed by the hospital staff. This theme illustrated the provision of the educational program by the staff, as there was no specialist educator personnel to run the program. This was due to a lack of financial support for a specialist educator. The effectiveness and success of the education process depend on the educator's professional skills. Occasionally, education is provided by an educational supervisor, or nurses such as series education, which is only as a task, although some education may be successful. Geravandi et.al study finding showed that education was effective by the clinical supervisor [38].

Nursing education plays a major role in fostering the mind to think in clinical practices, different situations, and the establishment of communication between events, decision making, and conceptualization to promoting community health [39]. Nurses reported training as an effective factor in their ability to gain knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy in different areas. For instance, a study showed the effect of education to promote nurses' ability on patient care improvement and increase the quality of health care [10].

Nurses emphasized interactive education. Nurses in in-person education can ask questions, receive answers, and there is a relationship between the educator and learner. Nurses showed their tendency to use interactive social media. That means they could write their question if they could not understand the content or can comment on website/app content. The use of online courses also provides a good opportunity for expanding scientific content and increasing the depth of learning because of the flexibility provided. A study concluded that e-learning can be considered as a supportive and complementary method in nursing education [40]. Indeed, using social media for sharing information and connecting with their colleague, also for peer support, peer learning, and participation engagement seem effective and beneficial.

Participants also had comments on barriers and facilitators of education. Nurses acknowledged that they could not access the content if they did not attend the training. They believed they could access information and educational content using a social media method at any time, anywhere. This supports a study by Thiele which showed access to more information, taking responsibility for learning by learners, and access to educational content at any time by nursing students were achieved [41]. This finding is also consistent with Buckley et al. results who theorized that the facility of access to educational content in the Web-based method leads to increased satisfaction of learners [42]. Nurses can use a variety of social media programs to advance their personal and professional goals. Nurses can access information for their workplace or personal lives, connect with colleagues, share information about best practices, and advance health through personal and professional means [43, 44].

Another side, the data depicted a lack of motivation as one of the barriers to training participation and can lead to not paying attention to educational content, and also leaving the class before the education finished. In similar studies, inadequate motivation for education, lack of support, and encouragement for nurses to participate in education are mentioned [45, 46]. Thus, based on policymaking, managers are recommended to motivate nurses to attend in education, such as financial support, reward.

High workload, shortage of personnel, and lack of proportionality of the number of patients to the nurse in different units impede attending in-person education. Other studies also pointed to the high amount of work and work pressure on colleagues for attending continuing education as a barrier [40, 47]. As well, the data indicated inadequate financial support of the organization or lack of funding for education to create a suitable platform for education, in particular, in-person education. So that hospitals should run educational programs following the Ministry of Health instructions. However, the cost of education and the necessary preconditions for the implementation of education are not provided. This issue has always been one of the most important problems for education executives. In similar studies, inadequate funding by the organization was a major barrier to nurses' attendance in professional education [45, 48]. While nurses believed that directors' support from nursing staff would have a key role in their productivity. Furthermore, nurses represent education social media is appropriate because of increased quality of learning, ease of access to a high level of information at a limited time, reduced costs and also, family conditions, fatigue due to long work hours, and a lack of adequate human resources.

Limitations, implications, and perspectives

The main limitation of our study is related to data collection. Some nurses were reluctant to participate in the study because of their high workload and lack of time. To overcome this limitation, the researcher asked nurses to choose the time of the interview according to their working conditions. Other limitations of this qualitative research include the following:

The interview process was time-consuming.

It was not possible to reach all the participants.

The interview required the consent and willingness of the respondent, the patience and perseverance of the interviewer.

Sometimes, participants were reluctant to express explicit opinions.

Strengths

Despite its limitations, our study has had several characteristics of value. Firstly, our results provided a platform from the nurses' standpoint to evaluate educational approaches. As well as, it is recommended policymakers assess resources, development, and allocation of budgets, organizational barriers, and coordination of the program according to target groups.

Conclusion

This study provided some advantages and barriers of the two educational methods from the nurses’ perspective. The choice of educational methods in nursing education is very important. Currently, despite inadequate motivation, insufficient support, and much workload, nurses are not motivated enough to attend in-person education. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a suitable framework for the implementation of the education process for nursing personnel. Indeed, it seems that applying educational methods based on interactive social media might be helpful.

Availability of data and materials

The data will be available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Perrin M, Kim T, Stan R, Giesie P, Tabor J, Le Verche V, et al. Role of nursing competencies for accelerating clinical trials in stem cell clinics. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.17-0165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutton DW, Krein SL, Saint S, Graves N, Kolli A, Lynem R, et al. Economic evaluation of a catheter associated urinary tract infection prevention program in nursing homes. Am Geriatri Soc. 2018;66(4):742–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Browne G, Pinelli J. Advanced practice nursing roles: development, implementation, and evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(5):519–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03234.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosadeghrad AM. Factors influencing healthcare service quality. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(2):77–9. https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHPM.2014.65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rich ML, Miller AC, Niyigena P, Franke MF, Niyonzima JB, Socci A, et al. Excellent clinical outcomes and high retention in care among adults in a community-based HIV treatment program in rural Rwanda. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(3):e35–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e31824476c4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma RK. Emerging innovative teaching strategies in nursing. JOJ Nurse Health Care. 2017;1(2):55558.

  7. Westwood PS. What teachers need to know about teaching methods. Aust Council for Ed Research. Camberwell: ACER Press; 2008.

  8. Thomas G, Thorpe S. Enhancing the facilitation of online groups in higher education: a review of the literature on face-to-face and online group-facilitation. Interact Learn Environ. 2019;27(1):62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451897.

  9. Thorpe SJ. Online facilitator competencies for group facilitators. Group Facilitation: Res Appl J. 2016;1(13):79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darvish A, Bahramnezhad F, Keyhanian S, Navidhamidi M. The role of nursing informatics on promoting quality of health care and the need for appropriate education. Global J Health Sci. 2014;6(6):11–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n6p11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. While A, Dewsbury G. Nursing and information and communication technology (ICT): a discussion of trends and future directions. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(10):1302–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Korda H, Itani Z. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839911405850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chhabra HS, Sharma S, Verma S. Smartphone app in self-management of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):2862–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5788-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Irvine AB, Russell H, Manocchia M, Mino DE, Glassen TC, Morgan R, Gau JM, Birney AJ, Ary DV. Mobile-Web app to self-manage low back pain: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e3130. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kazemi SS, Tavafian SS, Hiller CE, Hidarnia A, Montazeri A. The effectiveness of social media and in-person interventions for low back pain conditions in nursing personnel (SMILE). Nurs Open. 2021;8:1220–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weymann N, Dirmaier J, Von Wolff A, Kriston L, Härter M. Effectiveness of a Web-based tailored interactive health communication application for patients with type 2 diabetes or chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3): e53. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosvall A, Carlson E. Registered nurses’ perception of self-efficacy and competence in smoking cessation after participating in a web-based learning activity. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23–24):4777–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4): e85. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiauzzi E, Pujol LA, Wood M, Bond K, Black R, Yiu E, Zacharoff K. painACTION-back pain: a self-management website for people with chronic back pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(7):1044–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00879.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kazemi SS, Tavafian SS, Hidarnia A, Montazeri A. Consequences and factors affecting work-related low back pain among nursing professionals: A qualitative study. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2019;18(3):291–303.

  21. Richardson JC, Ice P. Investigating students’ level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. Internet High Educ. 2010;13(1–2):52–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Green LW. Toward cost-benefit evaluations of health education: some concepts, methods, and examples. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(1_suppl):34–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981740020S106.

  23. Green LW. Health program planning. An educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Green LW, Ottoson JM. Public health education and health promotion. In: Novick LF, Morrow CB, Mays GP, editors. Public Health Administration: Principles for Population-Based Management. Boston: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2008. p. 589–620.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kazemi SS, Tavafian SS, Montazeri A. Social media intervention for lower back pain education study (SMILE): a protocol for a randomized trial to reduce occupational low back pain in nursing professionals. Int J Musculoskelet Pain Prev. 2019;4(3):211–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Humble ÁM. Technique triangulation for validation in directed content analysis. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(3):34–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Selvi AF. Qualitative content analysis. In The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics. 1st ed. Routledge. 2019. pp. 440–52. eBook ISBN: 9780367824471.

  29. Eriksson CG. Focus groups and other methods for increased effectiveness of community intervention-a review. Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl. 1988;1:73–80 (Supplement).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rubin MA, Bonnin MJ. Utilization of the emergency department by patients with minor complaints. J Emerg Med. 1995;13(6):839–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(95)02013-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Polit D, Beck C. Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020.

  32. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1(2):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Anney VN. Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. j Emerg Trends educ Res Policy stud. 2014;5(2):272–81.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thomas E, Magilvy JK. Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2011;16(2):151–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kent C, Laslo E, Rafaeli S. Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Comput Educ. 2016;1(97):116–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Geravandi S, Soltani F, Mohammadi MJ, Alizadeh R, Valipour A, Hoseini A, Rastegarimehr B, Yari AR, Karimyan A, Ghomeishi A. The effect of education on the nursing care quality of patients who are under mechanical ventilation in ICU ward. Data Brief. 2018;16:822–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kemppainen V, Tossavainen K, Turunen H. Nurses’ roles in health promotion practice: an integrative review. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(4):490–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/das034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Penz K, D’Arcy C, Stewart N, Kosteniuk J, Morgan D, Smith B. Barriers to participation in continuing education activities among rural and remote nurses. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2007;38(2):58–66. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20070301-03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thiele JE. Learning patterns of online students. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(8):364–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Buckey KM. Evaluation of classroom-based, web-enhanced, and web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(8):367–70. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jackson J, Fraser R, Ash P. Social media and nurses: insights for promoting health for individual and professional use. OJIN: Online J Issues Nurs. 2014;19(3):2. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol19No03Man02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ferguson C. It’s time for the nursing profession to leverage social media. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(4):745–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hegney D, Tuckett A, Parker D, Robert E. Access to and support for continuing professional education amongst Queensland nurses: 2004 and 2007. Nurse Educ Today. 2010;30(2):142–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brestovacki B, Milutinovic D. Continuing education of paediatric nurses in Vojvodina. Serbia Nurs Educ Today. 2011;31(5):461–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Munro KM. Continuing professional development and the charity paradigm: Interrelated individual, collective and organisational issues about continuing professional development. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(8):953–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Flores Pena Y, Alonso CM. Factors influencing nursing staff members’ participation in continuing education. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2006;14(3):309–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692006000300002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was originated from the first investigator’s Ph.D. thesis at the Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. The authors thank the staff of hospitals of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences especially nurses. As well, the research team needs to be honored and thankful to Claire E Hiller (School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) who contributed to the writing and editing of the paper.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SSK was the main investigator, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft. SST supervised the study and contributed to the writing process. AH helped in the design and contributed to the writing process. AM was the study advisor and contributed to providing the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sedigheh-Sadat Tavafian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Tarbiat Modares University of Ethics Committee for Health Research Ethics (IR. TUM. REC. 2017/545) approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazemi, SS., Tavafian, SS., Hidarnia, A. et al. Exploring nurses' experiences of social media and in-person educational interventions for professional development: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs 21, 126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00903-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00903-4

Keywords

  • Content analysis
  • Qualitative study
  • Education
  • In-person
  • Social media
  • Nurse